So here we are again, waited until winter NAMM and nothing really changed, I'm still at the same point debating among the models mentioned before (and some others maybe).
Meanwhile, I've visited several shops to try some actions hands-on and these are some of the conclusions:
PHA4: I like the action, really enjoyed it while playing some jazz but cannot really keep up to some more demanding classical styles, trills are OK but definetely not as playable as wished. It's still a good and expressive action if I was playing jazz only.
PHA50: While I liked the general feel of the PHA4 better, PHA50 was more playable by miles, I could perform trills and all sort of quick passages of both classical and jazz styles, it felt more forgiving at an expression level, still a bit unnatural IMO.
NWX: Absolutely amazing keybed, I know some folks claim it to be too heavy etc. but it felt to me absolutely alright, a joy to play and very reactive and expressive, really close to a real good accoustic. I'm saying this and I come from a Kawai GF2 action which is as playable yet lighter than the NWX, I still like both actions the best so far (as for DP).
NORD PIANO4: it was provided with a Kawai action (cannot recall the name), played just well although nowhere close to the NWX, it wasn't really at the level of 4000€ DP so immediately dismissed.
PXS1100: A lot of concerns on the internet about the "flaw action", technicalities aside, it just performed surprisingly good, I tried to find the error while playing different chords closer and farther to the fallboard and the result was nothing that I could really tag as a flaw considering how compact the whole slab is, there's obviously a slight difference in touch while getting towards the fallboard but nothing that prevented me from playing some demanding stuff. Also trills were more than acceptable and the general feel of the key (dynamics and responsiveness) was really good, sorry not to align with the mainstream.
GP310: The Casio-Bechstein, although tried it in several shops I wasn't really able to get a satisfactory result, it's very playable, touch is nice (not my favourite though), sound is nice, but the point is that the whole experience was a bit off, like you've got good ingredients but the combo is just not alright. Although it's not an option (I'm looking for a stage piano that serves as a good MIDI controller mainly) but tried it for the sake of it.
Well, at this point I'm still curious what the folks around here think and whether anyone had the chance to try the NUMA X GT (Fatar TP400 action same on the VIVO S9), also whether any clue on a possible MP12 (provided with GF3) in the short-mid term..
Back to my shopping list, I'd pick the NWX (P515) if it wasn't becasue it apparently doesn't send full MIDI range, I know you can adjust velocity curves etc. but a high-end DP that cannot send MIDI values above 9x is a bit of a turndown for me.. Also, and this is very secondary, I don't fully like its aesthetics, those 2 separate speakers look very old fashioned, I better like the design of the speakers on the FP90x but again that's just a minor point.
OTOH I think I'm crazy because of saying this, but I feel like the PXS1100 could just do the job (will see how much I'd regret it in the long run) but I still doubt whether it's got full pedaling and whether it's got consistent MIDI-on (and OFF).
FP90x (PHA50) is a valid alternative too, perhaps not my favourite touch for classical music (although it nails it for jazz and others), it feels like it's a safe bet as a whole..
Any other ideas/suggestions are welcome.
Regards,
David
Last edited by davidizquierdo82 (20-04-2022 14:25)
P85>Kawai CA97>Numa XGT>FP90X>LX706
Pianoteq 8 Pro (all instruments) + Organteq 2
i7 4790K W11 64bits + UMC1820 + MTM + DT770 pro X
http://youtube.com/DavidIzquierdoAzzouz