Qexl wrote:Warm welcome to you RichieBill,
it's a pleasure to read your message.
Professor Leandro Duarte wrote:Welcome friend!
Thank you very much for so warm welcome
Professor Leandro Duarte wrote:... I laugh each time a new sample-based digital keyboard comes out, promising to be the best.
Absolutely right! Usually they do more exaggerated speach and marketing shows than really significant improvement. Maybe with two exceptions - Nord, especially their newest sample "White Grand" and their upright samples (any digital pianos brand doesn't have so great upright piano samples, like nord has got). Also Korg Grandstage grand piano sounds are quite good, which are based on Korg Kronos library.
Viridis wrote:About the Stage version: it gives me 100% playability. There's hardly a feature I miss, compared to Standard.
I believe that Pianoteq Stage is really good enough for the most piano genres, like classical, jazz and pop music but I am curious how Stage version options will be enough for more specific piano pieces, like for example: Olafur Arnalds, Nils Frahm, Agnes Obel or Hania Rani?
The same way, I am curious, how Standard version features are really improving acoustic effects the same Pianoteq samples. How significatly?
Viridis wrote:download the samples and listen to them, together with playing them. This could give you a good base to choose.
dazric wrote:As I usually say to prospective purchasers, take your time exploring the demo (you can demo both Stage and Standard if you like), almost as though you're auditioning pianos in a showroom.
Of course, I know - the best way is, to explore both Pianoteq versions (Stage, Standard) by yourself, which I am doing slowly right now, step by step. Probably I will need couple of weeks, to assess their all features.
sjgcit wrote:First, you can be assured that the preset sounds in Stage sound the same as the preset sounds in Standard and Pro..
Basic effects handled in Pianoteq work the same for all versions : so reverb, compression, equalization and so on can be adjusted the same way.
Yes, I know it.
sjgcit wrote:* Standard lets you position microphones of different types within the virtual sound stage and to control mixing of them.
I read some topics on pianoworld forum and many pianists who own plenty (even very expensive) VSTs, they compliment Pianoteq among others just for possibilities of microphones positioning as a the best feature of virtual piano.
sjgcit wrote:* Standard lets you load FXPs built with Pro (where all adjustments are possible, beyond what Standard offers) and all the adjustments work correctly. Stage will load these FXPs, but will ignore any adjustments in the FXP you cannot change from within Stage itself. That's pretty limiting,
Honestly, I am not sure yet, what is it?
sjgcit wrote:If you feel you need more control then try Standard.
Everything indicate me to more advanced options in Standard version but I am not hurry.
sjgcit wrote:The Pro version, IMO, really needs someone with "pro ears" and knowledge to exploit.
Agree. I don't think, that I need.
sjgcit wrote:the upgrade policy is very simple and you can upgrade from Stage to Standard for just the price difference between the two.
Basic effects handled in Pianoteq work the same for all versions : so reverb, compression, equalization and so on can be adjusted the same way.
So it is safe to buy Stage and use the presets. You may find they are all you need in which case you get get e.g. more instruments instead of Standard.
dazric wrote:Start with Stage if you want to tread lightly, and take the option to upgrade later (as I did).
Absolutely right. Fair enough and safe deal.
Guys! Thank you very much for your so active responses!
I like this forum
Kawai VPC1 | Arturia Minilab Mk2
Pianoteq 7 Pro | Synthogy Ivory II | Arturia Analog Lab Lite | Korg Collection
Roland Quad Capture | Neumann KH120 | Grado SR225i, SR80e