samuellidstrom wrote:What I'm saying is that they obviously must have put more work and research into the instruments they want money for.
If you have any information that proves they put as much work into the free ones as they do into the ones we pay for I'd love to see that.
If you don't have that information I think it's a bit bold to claim I'm wrong about this.
Samuel Lidstrom, your comments are ignorant.
You are brand-new here, by your own admission. Why are you making this totally unfounded accusation? What evidence or information do you have to support your insinuations?
Those of us who have been Pianoteq customers for many years, and who have spent many hours over many years playing all these instruments, know that you are wrong, based on our experiences and what we have witnessed.
I for one have been involved in giving feedback on several projects over several years to help Pianoteq to continue to refine and improve their instruments, including the KIViR "free" ones. They keep getting better and better.
You, on the other hand, come in here, by your own admission, with no experience using Pianoteq, never having tried the KIViR package at all, and you insist that you are right to call these products inferior. Don't you think you are the one being "bold" here? You are acting like a troll.
Since you are new here, why not keep your mouth shut and read what other people have posted, and work with the product, so that you can actually learn something before you spout off negative comments about things concerning which you are totally ignorant?
Last edited by Wheat Williams (27-06-2016 19:00)
Dayton, Ohio, United States of America
macOS 10.14.6 Mojave • Apple MacBook Pro (2017), no Touch Bar • 2.3 GHz Intel Core i5, 2 core • 8GB RAM