Beto-Music wrote:Kawai models have a very nice touch response.
But personally I found their piano sounds not great (just good), but too sampled feeling... a bit like playing a library... despite they claim to have string ressoance and other effects.
When get used with pianoteq start to feels like all sampled pianos are "too sampled"
Hey, this thread is very old, but as I got my MP-10 yesterday, I answer here instead of opening a new one.
I am still a beginner on the piano, I made my decision only on the basis of the keyboard action as I could try it out in the local music store (they have virtually everything there). Sound of the boards is very difficult to judge in a store because the sound quality of the headphone outs is very different from piano to piano.
In terms of keyboard action I found the MP-10 the best playable for me, maybe also because I am used to the partly worn out, but very smooth action of my Technics P30.
For the sound of the internal pianos I absolutely agree to the posting above: The sounds are ok, but have a nasty tonality and absolutely lack the aliveness of the Pianoteq I have become familiar with over the last months.
At home I switched back and forth between the Kawai MP-10 pianos (only the first one being really good), the GEM RP-x module and Pianoteq 4.5 (U4 upright) and while the Kawai versus GEM (highly praised) is more a question of taste (I prefer GEM by a slight margin), none of those 2 can match the authentic feeling and sound of the Pianoteq.
Now I haven't recently tried the tup libraries like Alicias Keys, Vintage D etc., but I yet need to hear a sample based piano that does not have that "dead Sample" sound, more or less prominent.
The only big advantage of the internal sounds is that you do not rely on a computer. Otherwise I am an absolute fan of Pianoteq and hope that they will come out with further upgrades and improvements of sound over the next years.
Question: Does someone play Pianoteq over the MP-10 and have an optimized vel curve?
Bernie