OK, I'll accept two responses as enough.
The first snippet is played by Andras Schiff (Hungarian born concert pianist, living in Britain). http://music.guardian.co.uk/classical/p...67,00.html
According to what I can ascertain, he mostly plays Bosendorfers. To me the sound doesn't seem to be a Steinway, but I may well be wrong - if anyone thinks it sounds like a Steinway, I'll listen.
The second snippet is Pianoteq K1, with the mics placed above and below the piano. Mic one: 0.660, 0.860, 0.300 Mic two: 0.840, 0.880, 1.440.
All other parameters are stock, except I increased the reverb a bit.
The third snippet is interesting because when I compared the Schiff recording and the second recording, I though that they were strikingly similar - except that the high notes seemed to ring too much in PT.
So for the third snippet, I reduced the Impedance as follows:
At C1, 0.00, At C4, 0.74, from C5 and higher, 0.48.
I never really played around to get optimum values, so these Imp values could probably be improved.
I also softened the hammers for the third snippet (0.20, 0.54, and 1.00). This is very soft.
Interestingly the friend I often refer to on this forum (he rebuilds pianos and presently has seven grand in his place from a 4'-11" Yamaha to a C7 Yamaha), chose the third snippet as the real piano. He's played just about everything there is including concert Steinways, Baldwins, Kawais, and Bosendorfers.
This wasn't a test to see how smart or knowledgeable anyone was, but to show how really good Pianoteq can be.
What are everybody's thoughts and opinions?
I think we are in good hands.
Glenn
EDIT - Graham, I'd guess that the very soft hammers had something to do with the muffled sound.
Last edited by Glenn NK (28-03-2010 04:31)
__________________________
Procrastination Week has been postponed. Again.