Topic: everything but the notes

I'd like to get pianoteq to generate the sympathetic resonances, the pedal-down resonance, the pedal noises, and the note-off sounds, but not the actual notes themselves.

Is this possible?  I realize in the real world things like sympathetic resonance don't exist without actual notes providing energy, but given that this is all math, I'm hopeful there is a way.

As a crude first-pass I tried turning up the levels on all those sounds as far as possible, then softening the hammers as much as possible to "hide" the actual notes.  But the soft note-ringing was still too intrusive.

Thanks...

-glenn

Re: everything but the notes

Hmmmm - a piano with all the creaks, groans, and rattles but producing no music - interesting concept.

I'm betting that it would require that some equations be turned off - it's not likely that damper noise is generated by the same algorithm that generates string and soundboard noise.

I'm also wondering out loud why?  And it seems to me that it can't be done without re-writing some code (or eliminating it).

Glenn

__________________________
Procrastination Week has been postponed.  Again.

Re: everything but the notes

Not to put text in Glittle's keyboard, but I bet the usage would be for utilizing a different piano or instrument sound -from another module or softsynth/sample- and to just take advantage of Pianoteq's "effects".
Definitely a practical application.  I could see an application where extreme resonance without the piano could be cranked up for playing along with sitar samples/virtual.  The pianoteqnicians could probably create an add-on that was just that -a resonance and extraneous noise generator.

"Downing a fifth results in diminished capacity."

Re: everything but the notes

Yes CelloMangler (stay away from my Cello please) has it right.  While pianoteq is getting lots of things right, it doesn't have an actual straight note tone that works for me yet.  I'll be overjoyed when it does, but in the mean time I need to commit some piano parts to recording.

I've been playing with the Garritan Steinway lately and it does have a wonderful, woody, warm body.  I prefer pianoteq's sympathetic resonance and so on though.  I'd like to try marrying the two together.  But it doesn't work so well when there's much tone from pianoteq competing with the Garritan notes.

The pianoteq has nailed the thing that sampled pianos haven't been able to get right yet, at least to my ear.  Even with the various convolution processing and so on, the sample-based pianos I've played with don't get the same rich-but-not-detuned resonance that pianoteq does.

-glenn

Re: everything but the notes

OK, thanks for explaining the "why".  The how part will be a bit harder I think.

If Pianoteq was my creation, I'd smile politely and say I was very  busy working on the sound you want (which is no doubt true).  But if I were to attempt to customize Pianoteq for individual customers, I'd never get anything else done (read a "few" posts and the quantity of requests for various changes soon becomes staggering).

Glenn

__________________________
Procrastination Week has been postponed.  Again.

Re: everything but the notes

Oh, yeah, although it would be a nice feature (and possibly help sell more copies of the software if it actually worked well with sample libs in practice since it would be a way to bring all those investments some new life), I wasn't asking as a feature request but rather just as a query to see if there's a knob or button I've missed.

-glenn

Re: everything but the notes

C'mon... let me play your cello....  ( actually I only mangle the audio vibrations through the use of various effects -it's highly addictive.  I'm hoping to summon the mother ship with the right output )

"Downing a fifth results in diminished capacity."

Re: everything but the notes

Here's a thread which mentions using Pianoteq's resonance in combination with a sampled piano in some capacity:

http://www.northernsounds.com/forum/arc...53692.html

Greg.

Last edited by skip (12-02-2010 13:12)

Re: everything but the notes

This is incredibly interesting because I have been talking to someone who owns Garritan Basic at the moment (through emails) and his impression is that Garritan sounds far superior when it comes to actually sounding like a true piano.  It has a much more real authentic wood sound etc. and he owns both Pianoteq and Garritan Steinway.

That doesn't mean Pianoteq won't get there.  Look at how much they have improved already.  It's only a matter of time I feel.

GLittle - Can you please tell me your honest opinion of the "Playability" of Garritan compared to Pianoteq.  I mean to the enth degree.  does it respond exactly how you expect it to when playing softly and then gradually build to fff?  Can you play a chopin etude and get all dynamic levels on that thing?

I have wasted more money than I want to mention on crappy virtual pianos.  Every one of them is a CD sitting on my shelf except Pianoteq.  I actually just 2 days ago considered buying Garritan Steinway Professional to "layer" with Pianoteq and yet this thread comes up.

I think it's fate .  But even so, I need to know if it dynamically responds well during playback because I can't find anywhere the amount of velocity layers etc.  And I refuse to spend "hours" editing my own piano performance within Logic Studio.  If I can't play it in, I won't record it.

Thanks,

Maestro2be

Re: everything but the notes

Cellomangler wrote:

( actually I only mangle the audio vibrations through the use of various effects -it's highly addictive.  I'm hoping to summon the mother ship with the right output )

Finally, someone's speaking my language!!!

%^)

"Our developers, who art in Toulouse, hallowed be thy physical-models.
Thy version 4 come, thy new instruments be done, in the computer as it is in the wood!"

Re: everything but the notes

The comment by maestro2be makes me wonder how many of the people that use samples actually play the piano with them.

As he says, a single note from a good sample sounds very, very good, but even at my level of piano playing, I use more than one note at a time, and quite a few of them consecutively.

I've never played samples, but I've never heard one sample demo (surely they put their best on display) that had the "connectivity" of sound that Pianoteq has.  Most samples aren't even close, and some are terrible.

I use connectivity to describe how different levels of volume, tone, pitch, note length, pedaling, etc fit together to emulate the seamless overall sound that a real piano can produce.  To a very large extent, Pianoteq does this very well, and to a very large extent, samples fail.

I listened to another demo (Synthogy) two days ago - the individual note sound can be great although sometimes it fails miserably for no apparent reason.

But virtually always, there are spots where I detect an anomaly in the flow of sound (a discontinuity or a break, an unexpected change in tone or loudness).

It's somewhat akin to playing a piano with one note very badly out of tune.

Glenn

__________________________
Procrastination Week has been postponed.  Again.

Re: everything but the notes

I am an owner and fan of the Garritan Steinway, but more for the same reasons I am excited about the future of Pianoteq.  They, too, seem to view this as a "process" vs a "product".  they have improved the offering pretty dramatically from its original release, and will likely continue that process with a major 5th update coming, which will include work on the samples.  Having said all that, if i were looking for a fresh start - and only judging from the demo work - the new Galaxy Vintage D Steinway sounds much better, at least to me.  I also own the Galaxy II Piano Suite, and it probably WORKS better than any of my sample programs.  But i like the sound of a Steinway, and the Steinway in Galaxy II is pretty weak, IMHO.  The Bosendorfer plays very, very well, but to me-  for the type of music i like to play- it doesn't cut it vs the steinway sound.  Go to Galaxy's site to the media page and listen to the Bach demo- it is played on both the new vintage D and the GII's Bos.  i think the Steinway sounds much, much better.  so if i were looking for another freakin' sample program, i'd probably buy the vintage D. 

Now my comments are regarding sound and recording.  As Glenn mentioned in his last post- playing is a whole 'nother ballgame.  As much as i've tried, i just can't get around the alien feeling of velocity switching.  particularly when trying to play an expressive solo.  it truly sucks.  and none of them have been able to beat down that bogeyman yet, other than pianoteq.  which is why i am hopeful pianoteq will continue to march up piano mountain, and reach the pinnacle before i get too damn old to play anymore.

Re: everything but the notes

maestro2b, regarding playability, I'm pretty much on the same page as boehnbr, although perhaps not quite as strongly.  The Garritan Steinway is more playable (as in, it's a musical experience) than other sample-based pianos I've played.  However, I do think pianoteq has the edge just in terms of the feel of playing.  But as I mentioned, I'm doing some recording and even when just playing, the somewhat "oscillator like" or vaguely plastic tone that appears now and then is just as distracting as all the well-discussed issues with the sample libs.

That said, I'm a member of the pianoteq forum for a reason, and believe that in the end it's going to be something well-modeled like the pianoteq that can truly be a musical instrument through and through.  They're getting there.

Regarding the Garritan Steinway, the Basic version doesn't cost too too much.  It's worth considering adding to your collection so you can spend some quality time with it and it may fit the bill.  I have no idea if there's a similarly-priced option with the new Galaxy.

Re: everything but the notes

Skip, thanks for that link.  I actually posted the same query over there last night.  There, xav was working on marrying the two by just trying to maximize resonance and minimize the direct sound.  I have found that to be difficult due to some of the issues subsequently brought up in that thread (e.g. tuning), but also because the pianoteq direct sound still messed with the sample sound.  Perhaps more experimentation is necessary, but being able to shut off the direct sound would be ideal.

Re: everything but the notes

Hi guys, this could be achieved, to some extent, by putting up two PTQ instances, with reverse phases (this is push-button in Reaper), so they basically cancel out each other.
Then in the reverse PTQ instance, turn down the parameters of all the stuff you DO want to hear:
1) Turn off sympth. resonance
2) Turn off note-off noises
etc ...

M-Audio Profire 610 / Roland Fp-3 / Reaper / PianoTeq!
www.myspace.com/etalmor

Re: everything but the notes

I think the most elegant solution is to be able to assign the resonance to it's own output, possibly combined with the other mechanical noises or perhaps they could be assignable as well.  Combine this with my other wish of definitive drop off for the mics, and... well, at least I'd be happy.

"Downing a fifth results in diminished capacity."

Re: everything but the notes

Cellomangler wrote:

I think the most elegant solution is to be able to assign the resonance to it's own output, possibly combined with the other mechanical noises or perhaps they could be assignable as well.  Combine this with my other wish of definitive drop off for the mics, and... well, at least I'd be happy.

PS:  As one who like to mess with sound, I imagine ideas such as processing the resonance with reverb, delay, etc.  What if you shifted the recorded resonance track forward in time (to the left in your editor) so that you began to hear the resonance before the chord ?  There are always more possibilities for the impurist when you can isolate features and muck with them.
Hmmm...  I hope it's not too narcissistic to quote oneself...

"Downing a fifth results in diminished capacity."