dv wrote:BarbaraRB wrote:I still don't see a difference. The Roland, Yamaha, and Casio apps are "crippled" unless you provide the necessary authorization. There is absolutely nothing they can do without that. So -- no different from PTQ requiring that you input your license number. License number/authorization number = identical thing. Buying a piano/buying PTQ = same thing, even if one is a solid object and the other is software. You may not see it that way -- we'll have to agree to disagree.
Let me be clear: I see your point and I agree with you in theory. I go even more and I say that the app stores are thieves, and they should charge much less than they do. But they don't do that, they are in charge and they do as they please, suggesting stuff that you don't want and hiding stuff you may want unless you search hard for them. The way they work for non-free app is how I described. If they didn't, they would not make any profit because everybody would do as you describe and avoid their hefty fees.
I don't know what kind of arrangements Apple and Google have made with companies like Roland, Casio, Yamaha or -- very soon -- PTQ. It may be that there is some kind of payment involved which the companies factor into their cost of doing business and providing the app to their customers. They haven't made that public.
I also have to say that there are many other examples of apps that don't fit in with your model. I use Virtual Sheet Music, which has both Google and IOS apps. VSM charges only about $37/year for membership (less after the first year). Yet the app is free. Some of what is on there is free for everyone; while downloading VSM's own scores is free for members. Non-members pay. And some scores, from publishers like Hal Leonard, always involve a fee -- less for VSM members, but still not free. Clearly, there is some kind of payment arrangement between VSM and Google/Apple, but it is invisible to the customer.
I don't think the financial model for the app stores is as monolithic as you describe it to be. They need to be flexible to accommodate different business structures/models. But you and I have no way of knowing how they structure this. It's proprietary information.
Last edited by BarbaraRB (18-11-2022 03:35)