Topic: Pianoteq a Game-Changer for New DP/Controler Consumer??
Hello folks. I'm new to this forum. Please excuse me if I break any rules. I'm curious if there are others here with similar experience/outlooks/decisions. And I'd really appreciate any evaluation, good, bad, or ugly of what I've got in mind.
Background:
I've been a hobbyist, home music producer for a couple of years. I've come to a realization that I really need to advance my skills with piano technique. I'd peg myself at the late beginner/early intermediate level. Not a complete musical newbie as I've been playing classical guitar for half a century! Whoa!, I'm old! (70)
My current setup:
Desktop computer with pretty beefy specs/speed
Windows 11
Reaper DAW
Yorkville 6" studio monitors
Arturia KeyLab61 mkII midi controller
Steinberg UR-22 mkII audio interface
Piano VST in Arturia's Analog Lab
Piano V VST by Arturia
A consumer research nerd, I've been combing many, many threads at Piano World's forum, at first with the intention of getting the dope on entry/mid-level digital pianos. My budget is $1500-$2500, which as I've learned situates me in the "entry-level" marketplace. What brings me to the market is my objective requires a full 88 keybed and graded hammer action in order support the quest of improving my piano technique.
The "game-changer" in my title to this post, I'll get to the bottom line, first. I've changed my mind and decided to forget about a DP and go with midi controller which meets the 88-key/GHA criteria. Given the number of satisfied pianists who own one of Roland's FP-X series of DPs, it seems I could do well to buy Roland's A-88 mkII midi controller, which has the same GHA-4 hammer action as these FPX digital pianos. Here's what I've believe I've learned by following discussions in Piano World:
1) Amplification and speaker quality in the slabs and small boxes of entry-level DPs and even Roland's FP-90x give rise to common source of disappointing audio output
2) DP piano sounds and really, all its sounds are fixed and limited to what's packaged in DP's internal library
3) Quality, versatility, options of DP internal sounds, although many are touted to be very good, are no match for a good VST
4)There is much ado in Piano World, almost all of it positive, about leading piano VST's especially Pianoteq
5) Pianoteq is not a memory hog, nor demand's a super-duper CPU, and permits 3 separate installations (FAQ)
Number 5 is a pivot point for me. It means I can install Pianoteq on my desktop, but if I'm ambitious I can build my own separate DP setup by also installing Pianoteq on my fair-to-middling laptop and using it in standalone mode in conjunction with another set of small monitors. The price of the Roland controller is at the low end of my budget, leaving room for half-decent external speakers, and a Pianoteq license.
Pianoteq's sterling reputation, along with it's meager computer demands, I think, has put me over the top, decision-wise, a game-changer. I think I can abandon the whole DP consumer research project and actually come out way better by staying the realm of midi controllers.
A bonus, although I'm somewhat dubious about it, is that the Roland A-88 mkII is also MIDI 2.0 ready, so apparently I'd get some future-proofing. I'd love to know if Modartt is strategizing an entry into MIDI 2.0 territory!
To wrap up, I'm wondering about a couple things, which, with gratitude seeks input from the more experienced, savvy participants here. This could be anything, be comments, suggestions, criticism, warnings, pointers. Maybe I've blundered somewhere here. Second, are there any forum participants who have already traveled a route somewhat or even remotely similar to what I've got in mind?
Input very much appreciated!
bashley (bob)