Topic: New York Steinway D (help choosing instrument packs)
Hello,
Is the new New York Steinway D considered, because it's new, better or more advanced than the other instruments?
Thanks
Hello,
Is the new New York Steinway D considered, because it's new, better or more advanced than the other instruments?
Thanks
Hello,
Is the new New York Steinway D considered, because it's new, better or more advanced than the other instruments?
Thanks
The New York D is part of the D pack with the German version. You get both versions. Steinways make up something like 90-95% of all the concert pianos in concert halls. They absolutely dominate through superior marketing power.
Honestly you won't hear it as more or less accurate than the other models, just try all of them and pick the pianos you like. YC5 is a model of a Yamaha concert piano (extremely popular with rock and pop music). So those two are fairly ubiquitous in sample instrument libraries too and a safe pair of choices.
Hello,
Is the new New York Steinway D considered, because it's new, better or more advanced than the other instruments?
Thanks
Meanwhile, you “could” call it more advanced as it only runs on the latest version of Pianoteq.
Hello,
Is the new New York Steinway D considered, because it's new, better or more advanced than the other instruments?
Thanks
Not really. All pianos receive an upgrade in their modelling when there are upgrades between each major version. The new Steinway D (NY) is just the brilliant piano you would hear in most music halls around the world while the previous (Hamburg) had a warmer tone overall. In the end the choice is personal but there is hardly an inferior piano at this point, just different ones for different tastes.
Since Modartt learns and improves with each model, yes, the NY Steinway D is 'better and more advanced' than its predecessors, including the Hamburg Steinway D that was designed before it. That being said, since there is no standard set of speakers or amplifiers for Pianoteq, each owner's mileage does vary, and some instruments will sound more realistic on individual setups. For example, the Bluethner is a perennial favorite among many owners - after taking what seemed like a step backwards from Pianoteq ver 5 to ver 6, the Bluethner sounds much better again in ver 7 - to some owners, this is still the best sounding piano. As Chopin87 said, all models get tweaked for the new releases. For Pianoteq 7, all models got 'retrofitted' with the double polarization model, whereby the harmonic nodes on the strings are now represented not only along the length of each string, but also across the face of each string, adding to the audible interactions between string resonances. But the NY Steinway D is the first piano that was created with this model natively, so it might thus be considered more advanced. Still, different models do interact very well with different hardware. On my system, the C. Bechstein DG used to be the best sounding (and the newest then) until the NY Steinway D was released.
New York And Hamburg Steinway-D... Close like brothes...
Similar, but not identical...
Well, said that.. all piano models got improvements in pianoteq 7, as they have the new algorithm for double polarization, related to string vibration emulation.
So, the brothers are dancing in the same rhythm of quality:
New York And Hamburg Steinway-D...
Similar, but not identical...
Well, said that.. all piano models got improvements in pianoteq 7, as they have the new algorithm for double polarization, related to string vibration emulation.
Well said. One may add that the Hamburg Steinway works on older Pianoteq versions, while the NY Steinway doesn’t. Hence you can play the former without double polarization in Pianoteq 6 or lower, but you have to run the latter on Pianoteq 7.
Since Modartt learns and improves with each model, yes, the NY Steinway D is 'better and more advanced' than its predecessors, including the Hamburg Steinway D that was designed before it.
I'm not sure it works that way. Everything sounds equally advanced by the upgrades in the software to my ears. Just because a new model got the advancements first doesn't mean they weren't all equally advanced in this regard at the time of version seven's release (when most of us got to hear them).
For Pianoteq 7, all models got 'retrofitted' with the double polarization model, whereby the harmonic nodes on the strings are now represented not only along the length of each string, but also across the face of each string, adding to the audible interactions between string resonances. .
Exactly, I don't believe Modartt held back any of the new techniques for the latest model to make the New York D shine more brightly! - It might be interesting if Modartt could fill in the gaps in the information if what you suggest is correct.
But the NY Steinway D is the first piano that was created with this model natively, so it might thus be considered more advanced.
I don't get why you might think that this time.
It could make sense when a brand new piano model comes out a long time after a new major version release that the new model could be more advanced if latest techniques are not applied to the others at that time, but here all of them are supposed to have been upgraded.
Still, different models do interact very well with different hardware. On my system, the C. Bechstein DG used to be the best sounding (and the newest then) until the NY Steinway D was released.
I can agree here. Different loudspeakers set up differently in wildly different room acoustics played at different volumes by different players with different keyboards. often comparing different (or modified) presets.
There's a lot of differences to personal experiences there!
As far as I know the pianoteq "refurbished modelled pianos", the relatively older models, from some years to today, get the same or virtually the same quality as the new models, after pianoteq engine updates, as long as the recording process used for such models where made with high quality compatible with the quality used for the new model.
Modelled technology don't use samples to generate sound, but require many sound samples and measurements for analyze the sound behavior and properties & ressonances of the real piano.
There was a piano model, a rocking C. Bechstein from 1895 (not the 1899 availabre on Kremslegg 2 pack), that could not be upgraded to the finest pianoteq engine to get the same quality of newer models, some years ago, as the sound recording used for this instrument wasn't made with the best quality as the others. Today this model can be found only in the Legacy instruments.
Anyway, I wouldn't be surprised if Modartt would decide to record (analyze) Steinway-D Hamburg again, if needed, to keep the quality standart at the same level of new models, considering the importance and fame of a grand Steinway-D piano.
By the way, it could be nice to test the Legacy instruments with pianoteq 7 engine, which uses double polarization algorithm for strings, and compare with the Legacy running in pianoteq 6 or pianoteq 5. It will not sound as good as NY Steinway, but perhaps somewhat better than in version 5 or even 6.
By the way, it could be nice to test the Legacy instruments with pianoteq 7 engine, which uses double polarization algorithm for strings, and compare with the Legacy running in pianoteq 6 or pianoteq 5. It will not sound as good as NY Steinway, but perhaps somewhat better than in version 5 or even 6.
The legacy instruments (from the legacy section in the user area) when loaded in Pianoteq 7 do not benefit from the new double polarization, they work just as they worked in the old original Pianoteq version, which is BTW the purpose of legacy instruments.
There is anyway no automatic process that adds new modelling features to old instruments. This needs a lot of work to have it implemented correctly, and has to be done case by case for each instrument. This is why it took so long to update all pianos with the new modelling features.
Beto-Music wrote:By the way, it could be nice to test the Legacy instruments with pianoteq 7 engine, which uses double polarization algorithm for strings, and compare with the Legacy running in pianoteq 6 or pianoteq 5. It will not sound as good as NY Steinway, but perhaps somewhat better than in version 5 or even 6.
The legacy instruments (from the legacy section in the user area) when loaded in Pianoteq 7 do not benefit from the new double polarization, they work just as they worked in the old original Pianoteq version, which is BTW the purpose of legacy instruments.
There is anyway no automatic process that adds new modelling features to old instruments. This needs a lot of work to have it implemented correctly, and has to be done case by case for each instrument. This is why it took so long to update all pianos with the new modelling features.
If I am honored that you replied to my thread, can you please throw a word about my question? Or I'll try to rephrase it - if you needed to choose 2 or 3 instrument packs to a pianoteq purchase, would the new NY Steinway D be definitely one of them?
Thanks
Thanks
Philippe Guillaume wrote:Beto-Music wrote:By the way, it could be nice to test the Legacy instruments with pianoteq 7 engine, which uses double polarization algorithm for strings, and compare with the Legacy running in pianoteq 6 or pianoteq 5. It will not sound as good as NY Steinway, but perhaps somewhat better than in version 5 or even 6.
The legacy instruments (from the legacy section in the user area) when loaded in Pianoteq 7 do not benefit from the new double polarization, they work just as they worked in the old original Pianoteq version, which is BTW the purpose of legacy instruments.
There is anyway no automatic process that adds new modelling features to old instruments. This needs a lot of work to have it implemented correctly, and has to be done case by case for each instrument. This is why it took so long to update all pianos with the new modelling features.
If I am honored that you replied to my thread, can you please throw a word about my question? Or I'll try to rephrase it - if you needed to choose 2 or 3 instrument packs to a pianoteq purchase, would the new NY Steinway D be definitely one of them?
Thanks
Thanks
Sorry Gurnisht I'm not sure to be the most "objective" person to answer your question, but if you accept my subjectivity, yes, definitely, Steinway D pack (contains both HB and NY variants) would be one them!
OK, here's my view: if I was a first-time purchaser, the Steinway D pack would definitely be at the top of my wish list. Remember that you get both the Hamburg and NY variants, so it's pretty good value. It's all down to personal taste, of course, so the best thing you can do is to take your time with the demo version. Audition all the pianos that you're interested in until you arrive at your final choice.
Thanks for the input Philippe :-)
That's really a impressive work, to update all instruments again, again and again.
In some way can become a snowball, since after each new instrument added it will represent one more instrument to be "refurbished" in future to cope with newer quality standarts.
It makes modelling even more amazing, from this point of view, as in the sampler industry they just "throw away" a old release and people have to buy a entire new library with more advanced features.
I'm curious if double polarization affect somehow metal plates, like in Rhodes piano and vibraphone, as their vibrations are not so evident for people to figure.
The legacy instruments (from the legacy section in the user area) when loaded in Pianoteq 7 do not benefit from the new double polarization, they work just as they worked in the old original Pianoteq version, which is BTW the purpose of legacy instruments.
There is anyway no automatic process that adds new modelling features to old instruments. This needs a lot of work to have it implemented correctly, and has to be done case by case for each instrument. This is why it took so long to update all pianos with the new modelling features.
Hello,
Is the new New York Steinway D considered, because it's new, better or more advanced than the other instruments?
Thanks
Still no distinct answer, quite interested by myself ;-)
Or should we take the discussion above as a "no" for this question?
Come on... Do you think Modartt would let Hamburg Steinway behind New York Steinway?
Hamburg model, was reworked, as explained by Philippe, to get the advantages of double polarization.
Play it, trust your ears.
By the way, a nice reading:
https://davidandersenpianos.com/hamburg...fferences/
Gurnisht wrote:Hello,
Is the new New York Steinway D considered, because it's new, better or more advanced than the other instruments?
Thanks
Still no distinct answer, quite interested by myself ;-)
Or should we take the discussion above as a "no" for this question?
Gurnisht wrote:Hello,
Is the new New York Steinway D considered, because it's new, better or more advanced than the other instruments?
Thanks
Still no distinct answer, quite interested by myself ;-)
Or should we take the discussion above as a "no" for this question?
The answer is clear, IMO.
All non-legacy instruments have been fully updated to Pianoteq 7. They all share the same advanced model tech. So, if you’re running Pianoteq 7, then all of these instruments are similarly advanced. Only if you run them in Pianoteq 6 or lower, you’ll miss out on the new model tech. You can’t run the new NY Steinway that way, though, as it was launched with Pianoteq 7.
That said, if I would be starting with Pianoteq now, the Steinway D instrument pack (with both NY and Hamburg Steinways) would be my first pick. Both sound absolutely wonderful in Pianoteq 7. Also, this is the only contemporary acoustic piano pack that includes two instruments. High quality bargain.
One thing that might be of valuer to add...
If there is a instrument better, in technical modelling aspects, than the others, this would be the Ant. Petrof.
Petrof, as far as I know, was the only one recorded in a anechoic chamber :
I'm not saying the other models was recorded in environments with reverberation. They record as clean as they can, using some sound insulation materials around or in walls, as much as possible. But the anechoic chamber offer a higher degree of sound insulation, resulting a pure piano sound to be analyzed for modelling.
I wonder if someone could create a portable anechoic chamber. Sounds crazy, but a think a smaller compact structure, to be assembled around the piano, could work almost as well. Like a steel frame structure that allow assemble/disassemble easily, with the anechoic foam pieces able to attach like a lego in a net around the steel frame. And smaller anechoic "foam triangle pieces" to put bellow the piano soundboard.
Voilà...
if you needed to choose 2 or 3 instrument packs to a pianoteq purchase, would the new NY Steinway D be definitely one of them?
For me, yes. Everyone has their own personal taste though. All of the pianos are great and each has its own individual character and characteristics, which one can hear to some extent by listening to the sample audio at the Modartt.com website; however, that is not quite the same as the impression one gets of an instrument while listening to their own playing of that instrument.
My own personal favorites at this time are the NY Steinway D (a superb instrument model which is bundled with the equally impressive Hamburg Steinway D), the Steingraeber and the C. Bechstein. But the Bluethner and others are often mentioned by Pianoteq users as favorites, and the updated versions of all of them sound just great. As for myself, over time I have bought every piano (and most other instruments) produced by Modartt. The variety is very nice, but it's really up to each person and their own judgment.
I gladly second Stephen's suggestions: Steinway D with that wonderful new NY model, Steingraeber and C. Bechstein DG. But the Blüthner remains a favorite as always.
I gladly second Stephen's suggestions: Steinway D with that wonderful new NY model, Steingraeber and C. Bechstein DG. But the Blüthner remains a favorite as always.
Thanks all. I liked the Steinway B the most, it was most the fun to play and really felt like a piano. So I chose it, the D (because of the recommendations here) and the electric pianos.
Good choice on that B. Great for jazz too. The electric pianos are pretty amazing as well, and will allow for some interesting morphing and layering in Standard or Pro.