Topic: Auratone 5C good Speakers for Pianoteq?

Hello all,

Sorry for posting yet another question about what speakers to use, but I would like to inquire about a specific model that I consider buying:

The Auratone 5C https://www.auratoneaudio.com/products

They have an excellent reputation for studio monitoring and producing clean, untainted output.

I am currently using a pair of Bose Soundlink Mini Mk 1, which do produce a nice sound, but one of them obviously has problems with its battery, causing it to break down a shut off at high levels, so a replacement is needed.

In case anybody of you is using the Auratone speakers, I have a couple of questions:

- Will 2x25 Watts RMS be enough power for home use?
- Low frequency is 80 Hz. If I did the math correctly, the lowest note (A0) would be 27,5 Hz. But would a real piano actually be capable of emitting this low frequency, or do we only hear the overtones of the note, so an additional subwoofer would not be necessary for my setup?
- Any other possible issues?

Thank you for your help!

Heinrich

Re: Auratone 5C good Speakers for Pianoteq?

In my opinion, 80 Hz is not low enough for a convincing piano sound.

Heinrich wrote:

Hello all,

Sorry for posting yet another question about what speakers to use, but I would like to inquire about a specific model that I consider buying:

The Auratone 5C https://www.auratoneaudio.com/products

They have an excellent reputation for studio monitoring and producing clean, untainted output.

I am currently using a pair of Bose Soundlink Mini Mk 1, which do produce a nice sound, but one of them obviously has problems with its battery, causing it to break down a shut off at high levels, so a replacement is needed.

In case anybody of you is using the Auratone speakers, I have a couple of questions:

- Will 2x25 Watts RMS be enough power for home use?
- Low frequency is 80 Hz. If I did the math correctly, the lowest note (A0) would be 27,5 Hz. But would a real piano actually be capable of emitting this low frequency, or do we only hear the overtones of the note, so an additional subwoofer would not be necessary for my setup?
- Any other possible issues?

Thank you for your help!

Heinrich

PT 7.3 with Steinway B and D, U4 upright, YC5, Bechstein DG, Steingraeber, Ant. Petrov, Kremsegg Collection #2, Electric Pianos and Hohner Collection. http://antoinewcaron.com

Re: Auratone 5C good Speakers for Pianoteq?

Yeah 80Hz cutoff is likely to sound too midsy and small.

They're great speakers!, but for studio monitoring (reference) - maybe not convincingly reproducing a big piano sound. But you may be happy with them - they're likely to be long lived.

But - until you hear them, you won't know for sure if you will be happy with them, and you might be - but 80Hz might be a compromise too much for me.

@aWc - you seemed very happy with those 5inch ones you mentioned elsewhere - Art RM5 - gotta say, I'm pretty impressed with 45Hz to 22kHz at that size - I forgot that.. not that I need any right now but, if I was looking for a small speaker, your advice in the past makes good sense. I could almost sense you wanted to post the link - I think it's more suited to 'piano in the room' than the Auratones.

I'll always enjoy my Yamaha HS8 near-field monitors - they satisfy piano playing and monitoring/mixing for me. If looking for speakers which are used in studios, these are very common - there are others but they suit me (flat response - which may not matter in general for playing piano).

Best thing is trying some out where/when you can and take some time. Try getting a sense of what they each bring to a reference song (take a piece of music to play on them). Some speakers like studio monitors might sound weirdly dry - when others may sound luscious.

Pianoteq Studio Bundle (Pro plus all instruments)  - Kawai MP11 digital piano - Yamaha HS8 monitors

Re: Auratone 5C good Speakers for Pianoteq?

Qexl wrote:

Yeah 80Hz cutoff is likely to sound too midsy and small.

@aWc - you seemed very happy with those 5inch ones you mentioned elsewhere - Art RM5 - gotta say, I'm pretty impressed with 45Hz to 22kHz at that size - I forgot that.. not that I need any right now but, if I was looking for a small speaker, your advice in the past makes good sense. I could almost sense you wanted to post the link - I think it's more suited to 'piano in the room' than the Auratones.

Yeah...almost put the link to the ARTs again...but I thought people might get sick of me pushing those boxes Still a happy customer though!

PT 7.3 with Steinway B and D, U4 upright, YC5, Bechstein DG, Steingraeber, Ant. Petrov, Kremsegg Collection #2, Electric Pianos and Hohner Collection. http://antoinewcaron.com

Re: Auratone 5C good Speakers for Pianoteq?

Add a subwoofer... though 80 Hz is still a bit high, even for a small sub like an 8", as they tend to get a bit muddy above 50 Hz.

- David

Re: Auratone 5C good Speakers for Pianoteq?

these speakers are used in studios to know how good your mix sound on a bad 'real world 'audio playback system.
I think that Behringer made a cheaper copy of them.......
Hope this helps......


Heinrich wrote:

Hello all,

Sorry for posting yet another question about what speakers to use, but I would like to inquire about a specific model that I consider buying:

The Auratone 5C https://www.auratoneaudio.com/products

They have an excellent reputation for studio monitoring and producing clean, untainted output.

I am currently using a pair of Bose Soundlink Mini Mk 1, which do produce a nice sound, but one of them obviously has problems with its battery, causing it to break down a shut off at high levels, so a replacement is needed.

In case anybody of you is using the Auratone speakers, I have a couple of questions:

- Will 2x25 Watts RMS be enough power for home use?
- Low frequency is 80 Hz. If I did the math correctly, the lowest note (A0) would be 27,5 Hz. But would a real piano actually be capable of emitting this low frequency, or do we only hear the overtones of the note, so an additional subwoofer would not be necessary for my setup?
- Any other possible issues?

Thank you for your help!

Heinrich

Re: Auratone 5C good Speakers for Pianoteq?

Thank you all for your quick replies!

As I was wandering what spectrum a piano actually produces, I decided to make my own measurement.
I created a midi file containing all 88 notes played at identical velocity of 80.
I loaded it into pianotec and exported as a wav file at 41kHz/16Bit.
The resulting wav was loaded into Audacity and a 4k FFT was performed. You can see the result in the attached snapshot.
As you can see, there is a notable decrease of 20db/Octave below 80 Hz, so the speakers would probably not do much harm.

I then did another measurement:
I created a midi file containing A0 played a few times at 128 velocity.
Again this was exported as wav by Pianoteq and a 4K FFT produced. The result attached as well.
In this case, decrease starts only at 50Hz, so I would lose some bass. Don't know if this will actually hurt me..

Next, I will play both tests over my existing Bose Soundlink Mini, record the output and do the same analysis. Problem is, that the frequency response of these speakers will probably depend heavily on the volume level, especially in the bass region. We will see..

All notes test: https://www.rebehn.net/Pianoteq/test.jpg

A0 test: https://www.rebehn.net/Pianoteq/A0.jpg


-Heinrich

Re: Auratone 5C good Speakers for Pianoteq?

Could you do this for the highest notes as well? I am curious what is the highest frequency that is played I am talking about harmonics not just a 4K that is the highest note

Heinrich wrote:

Thank you all for your quick replies!

As I was wandering what spectrum a piano actually produces, I decided to make my own measurement.
I created a midi file containing all 88 notes played at identical velocity of 80.
I loaded it into pianotec and exported as a wav file at 41kHz/16Bit.
The resulting wav was loaded into Audacity and a 4k FFT was performed. You can see the result in the attached snapshot.
As you can see, there is a notable decrease of 20db/Octave below 80 Hz, so the speakers would probably not do much harm.

I then did another measurement:
I created a midi file containing A0 played a few times at 128 velocity.
Again this was exported as wav by Pianoteq and a 4K FFT produced. The result attached as well.
In this case, decrease starts only at 50Hz, so I would lose some bass. Don't know if this will actually hurt me..

Next, I will play both tests over my existing Bose Soundlink Mini, record the output and do the same analysis. Problem is, that the frequency response of these speakers will probably depend heavily on the volume level, especially in the bass region. We will see..

All notes test: https://www.rebehn.net/Pianoteq/test.jpg

A0 test: https://www.rebehn.net/Pianoteq/A0.jpg


-Heinrich

Re: Auratone 5C good Speakers for Pianoteq?

I think you might find some elements of these pages interesting:

http://rtaylor.sites.tru.ca/2017/01/10/...put-level/

http://rtaylor.sites.tru.ca/2017/01/05/...-response/

http://rtaylor.sites.tru.ca/2017/09/18/...erference/

Of course the desire to reproduce full dynamics of a full size concert piano reasonably accurately at full realistic levels is quite something else to what most of us require from any piano VST, or could even accommodate. Mostly we want a convincing simulcrum at comfortable domestic levels from a sound that doesn't overwhelm our (typically more modest) domestic living spaces.

Re: Auratone 5C good Speakers for Pianoteq?

brian dan wrote:

Could you do this for the highest notes as well? I am curious what is the highest frequency that is played I am talking about harmonics not just a 4K that is the highest note

I am not quite sure what you mean. "not just a 4K" ?? Do you simply want me to play a couple of C8 and do a spectral analysis of it?

-Heinrich

Re: Auratone 5C good Speakers for Pianoteq?

Key Fumbler wrote:

I think you might find some elements of these pages interesting:

http://rtaylor.sites.tru.ca/2017/01/10/...put-level/

http://rtaylor.sites.tru.ca/2017/01/05/...-response/

http://rtaylor.sites.tru.ca/2017/09/18/...erference/

Of course the desire to reproduce full dynamics of a full size concert piano reasonably accurately at full realistic levels is quite something else to what most of us require from any piano VST, or could even accommodate. Mostly we want a convincing simulcrum at comfortable domestic levels from a sound that doesn't overwhelm our (typically more modest) domestic living spaces.

Most interesting reading, surely produced with a lot of effort and knowledge!
I must confess that I don't quite have the expertise to fully understand your article.
Yet I would conclude that I would not lose much of the piano sound using speakers starting at 80 Hz.

-Heinrich

Re: Auratone 5C good Speakers for Pianoteq?

Heinrich wrote:

...
Most interesting reading, surely produced with a lot of effort and knowledge!
I must confess that I don't quite have the expertise to fully understand your article.
Yet I would conclude that I would not lose much of the piano sound using speakers starting at 80 Hz.

-Heinrich

Manufacturers spec's can be fanciful if they don't give you all the facts.
Firstly the manufacturers specifications for the speakers only quote 80 hz - 15khz, no plus/minus figures.

The top end of that frequency response claim is not a problem, 15khz will cover more than the meaningful output of a piano, and indeed any musical instruments.
However the 80hz figure for the low end could be more of a problem. The manufacturers don't give you the roll off figures for a reason, only claiming that they can reproduce sound down to 80hz.
Looks like they are down a whopping -30dB at 80hz:
https://en.audiofanzine.com/passive-mon...-aura.html

Re: Auratone 5C good Speakers for Pianoteq?

Key Fumbler wrote:

Manufacturers spec's can be fanciful if they don't give you all the facts.
Firstly the manufacturers specifications for the speakers only quote 80 hz - 15khz, no plus/minus figures.

The top end of that frequency response claim is not a problem, 15khz will cover more than the meaningful output of a piano, and indeed any musical instruments.
However the 80hz figure for the low end could be more of a problem. The manufacturers don't give you the roll off figures for a reason, only claiming that they can reproduce sound down to 80hz.
Looks like they are down a whopping -30dB at 80hz:
https://en.audiofanzine.com/passive-mon...-aura.html

This is really bad news. Actually, more detailed information about the roll off would have been my next question, so thank you very much for the link to the audiofanzine article.

Seems that the auratones are not quite what I need.

Pros:

- small. Would neatly fit on my VPC-1
- passive: can freely select amp, no hassle with noisy built-in amps
- cute, as opposed to JBL Control 1, for example
- probably good, detailed sound

Cons:

- Weak bass, might need to add subwoofer
- Too expensive for something that does not exactly fit my needs

Maybe I will stick with my Boses and repair the faulty one.

Or are there any other suggestions which would meet my Pros-List?

-Heinrich

Re: Auratone 5C good Speakers for Pianoteq?

Heinrich wrote:
Key Fumbler wrote:

Manufacturers spec's can be fanciful if they don't give you all the facts.
Firstly the manufacturers specifications for the speakers only quote 80 hz - 15khz, no plus/minus figures.

The top end of that frequency response claim is not a problem, 15khz will cover more than the meaningful output of a piano, and indeed any musical instruments.
However the 80hz figure for the low end could be more of a problem. The manufacturers don't give you the roll off figures for a reason, only claiming that they can reproduce sound down to 80hz.
Looks like they are down a whopping -30dB at 80hz:
https://en.audiofanzine.com/passive-mon...-aura.html

This is really bad news. Actually, more detailed information about the roll off would have been my next question, so thank you very much for the link to the audiofanzine article.

Seems that the auratones are not quite what I need.

Pros:

- small. Would neatly fit on my VPC-1
- passive: can freely select amp, no hassle with noisy built-in amps
- cute, as opposed to JBL Control 1, for example
- probably good, detailed sound

Cons:

- Weak bass, might need to add subwoofer
- Too expensive for something that does not exactly fit my needs

Maybe I will stick with my Boses and repair the faulty one.

Or are there any other suggestions which would meet my Pros-List?

-Heinrich

They are probably better than most speakers Bose ever made, but if you had a larger sub sat Bose system you might miss the bass output - I see you have a tiny toy system - the Auratones should wipe the floor with that.

The speaker system having to sit on the VPC1 is a significant limitation in terms of quality!
I suggest making some space for some proper mini monitor speakers on stands, wall mounted or floor standers. 

If it really has to be teeny tiny speakers consider these:
Genelec 8010a (usually sold as single speakers so budget for a pair!)
https://www.juno.co.uk/products/genelec...itors%20CW

Re: Auratone 5C good Speakers for Pianoteq?

Key Fumbler wrote:

They are probably better than most speakers Bose ever made, but if you had a larger sub sat Bose system you might miss the bass output - I see you have a tiny toy system - the Auratones should wipe the floor with that.

The speaker system having to sit on the VPC1 is a significant limitation in terms of quality!
I suggest making some space for some proper mini monitor speakers on stands, wall mounted or floor standers. 

If it really has to be teeny tiny speakers consider these:
Genelec 8010a (usually sold as single speakers so budget for a pair!)
https://www.juno.co.uk/products/genelec...itors%20CW

Key Fumbler wrote:

- I see you have a tiny toy system -

I admit, they are not on par with my 901/IV but I wonder if you have ever heard the Soundlink Mini. I recorded the 88 notes sequence already shown in post #7, upper picture with the Boses and got this picture:

https://www.rebehn.net/Pianoteq/test-soundlink.jpg

At 80 Hz, this does look better than the picture shown in the audiofanzine post.
Would the auratones really "wipe the floor" compared to the Boses?

OTOH one must keep in mind that the Soundlinks probably are heavily dsp'ed, so at higher volume levels, the picture could look completely different. The auratones would surely produce a more honest picture, independent of volume.

While we're at it, I have a question about the frequency response shown in the picture above. I have close to zero knowledge about signal processing and FFTs. I simply loaded the wav file into Audacity and selected "Analyse->Plot Spectrum". Why does the frequency response begin to rise below 50 Hz? If I do longer FFTs, I can even see 5Hz at -39dB. Of course this is an artefact. Do I have a DC offset? Or is it a windowing effect?

As for the Genelec speakers: I'm afraid I don't like their look

Key Fumbler wrote:

The speaker system having to sit on the VPC1 is a significant limitation in terms of quality!

Why is this?

Many thanks for your help!

-Heinrich

Re: Auratone 5C good Speakers for Pianoteq?

You have to understand the DSP system in your Bose is clever technology for a product in it's size class. There is only so much you can get out of miniscule drivers before you get overwhelming distortion in the signal.  The human ear is quite tolerant of large amounts of distortion, which is why we can get away with small speakers.
Small is a relative term, the Bose drive units are absolutely miniscule. DSP can work wonders, which is why a system that small can work at all. 

You are almost certainly unaware of just how close a good hi-fi or serious active loudspeaker system can be to the live sound. Relative to a miniature Bose sound like this I would say that quality high fidelity systems (active with or without DSP or passive) are several orders better.
Bose systems are not really for the discerning ear, they are not for people that care about convincing dynamic range, or the most realistic natural sound.  They are very, VERY good at what they do which is mainly marketing but also making relatively capable systems if audibly compromised to discerning ears (golden or otherwise!)  that are visually inoffensive to spouses.

I'm not saying Bose product is bad by any means (they are very clever for what they are), you have to understand the niche it is designed to cater for.

I hope this doesn't sound dismissive but If you want to understand what you have measured and how that relates to sound quality that is a topic for another forum.

Ideally you want loudspeakers that radiate into free space or designed to be used against a good solid wall if the former isn't at all practical in your home.  Speakers sitting on top of a keyboard  creating unwanted resonances is not exactly ideal.

When lockdown has finished try to get to a music shop with quality active speaker systems or a serious Hi-Fi dealer and listen to your pianoteq recordings through a decent system.

If you are happy living with compromised performance for domestic bliss that's fine, just don't fall for the marketing lie, the quality is compromised, but can still be enjoyable.

Last edited by Key Fumbler (31-05-2020 11:49)

Re: Auratone 5C good Speakers for Pianoteq?

Hi all,

To put an end to this, I tossed a coin yesterday and ordered the Auratone 5C. They will hopefully arrive this week. I will report about my listening experience.

The Bose speakers will be connected to my cheap TV set, where they will certainly do a nice job replacing the inferior built in speakers.

Again, thanks for all the info!

-Heinrich

Re: Auratone 5C good Speakers for Pianoteq?

Heinrich wrote:

Hi all,

To put an end to this, I tossed a coin yesterday and ordered the Auratone 5C. They will hopefully arrive this week. I will report about my listening experience.

The Bose speakers will be connected to my cheap TV set, where they will certainly do a nice job replacing the inferior built in speakers.

Again, thanks for all the info!

-Heinrich

An excellent place for a Bose system. Almost certainly improving any TV. 
I hope you enjoy Auratone's high end "grot boxes"

Re: Auratone 5C good Speakers for Pianoteq?

Hi All,

I promised to share my listening experience with the Auratone speakers.
Well, it is a bit embarrassing, but the truth is: I sent them back the next day.

I was expecting the need to readjust my hearing habits, but actually it was a shock. The bass fundament was missing completely. This could have been remedied by fiddling with the equaliser, but also there was some strong, unpleasant colouring especially in the range C2 - C3, which I was unwilling to tolerate.

So I will stick with my Bose speakers, which I have enjoyed listening to since I started learning piano 1.5 years ago. Only problem was that one of the speakers failed at very high volumes and also, the range C4 - G5 sounds a bit limp. I approached this by selecting appropriate instrument settings like "Grotrian Player Wide", "Steinway D 3 Mics" or "ANT. Petrof Prelude". I thought I could improve this situation with new speakers.

The Bose speakers may not be honest, or even lie to me, yet I enjoy listening to them, and that's the only thing that counts. Also, they look good. I don't want huge, ugly monitors on stands in front of me.

Anyway, thanks to all who shared there knowledge and advice with me.

-Heinrich

Re: Auratone 5C good Speakers for Pianoteq?

I wouldn't let an experience with grot boxes put you off buying better speakers - they weren't designed to be the highest of Hi-Fi but in some key respects would still have been better than your Bose speakers.
Have a listen to some proper decent active two way monitors when lockdown finishes, not more tiny speakers designed to be grot boxes, or designed to be the size of dinky cheap computer speakers.

Re: Auratone 5C good Speakers for Pianoteq?

Heinrich wrote:

. . .

Next, I will play both tests over my existing Bose Soundlink Mini, record the output and do the same analysis. Problem is, that the frequency response of these speakers will probably depend heavily on the volume level, especially in the bass region. We will see..


-Heinrich

Do you have a microphone with flat low-bass response, and a room that doesn't have any resonances in that region ?

Those measurements are not easy.

.   Charles

Re: Auratone 5C good Speakers for Pianoteq?

cpcohen wrote:
Heinrich wrote:

. . .

Next, I will play both tests over my existing Bose Soundlink Mini, record the output and do the same analysis. Problem is, that the frequency response of these speakers will probably depend heavily on the volume level, especially in the bass region. We will see..


-Heinrich

Do you have a microphone with flat low-bass response, and a room that doesn't have any resonances in that region ?

Those measurements are not easy.

.   Charles

I used a Zoom H1 set to USB-Microphone mode. Placed it some inches in front of the speaker. I googled for the frequency response of the H1 but found only one match at https://www.media-maier.de/index.php/ww...-recorder:

https://www.media-maier.de/images/stori.../h1_16.jpg

Unfortunately the diagram starts only at 70 Hz.

Cannot tell much about the room. Normal living room.
I know that acoustic measurements are not easy, especially without calibrated gear.

As I said earlier, I will stick with the Bose speakers. I got used to their sound, enjoy playing over them and they fit neatly on my VPC1:

https://www.rebehn.net/Pianoteq/IMG_0546.jpeg

-Heinrich