Topic: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

Hi there,
I am very enthusiastic about the playability of Pianoteq 3.5. But I am still slightly concerned about how to obtain a more "intimate" sound. To give some examples I am thinking of Elton John's "Sorry Seems to Be the Hardest Word" or "You Song". In a different style, the piano sound of Tord Gustavsen. I recon that it may have more to do with recording techniques. But I would like to have some advise on how to achieve this with Pianoteq. Are there some .fxp that I should try?

Marc for Azure Feast
www.AzureFeast.com

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

Your best bet would be playing a bit with a brighter piano sound, like YC5 addon, and turning off Pianoteq's reverb, and purely playing with 5 microphones in Sound Recording mode - to get more of that close-miked sound.

Hard work and guts!

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

AzureFeast,

Could you upload an mp3 file or two showing what you mean by an intimate sound, and post what you like about the sound? This is a big thing--the distance of the sound, the closeness, the warmth that can be achieved, the intimacy. If you post some mp3's in the Files area, we'll have specific piano sounds to talk about. Or are there recordings that you can point us to, on the internet or on cd's?

Last edited by Jake Johnson (05-02-2010 03:39)

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

AzureFeast wrote:

Hi there,
I am very enthusiastic about the playability of Pianoteq 3.5. But I am still slightly concerned about how to obtain a more "intimate" sound. To give some examples I am thinking of Elton John's "Sorry Seems to Be the Hardest Word" or "You Song". In a different style, the piano sound of Tord Gustavsen. I rec[k]on that it may have more to do with recording techniques.

Marc for Azure Feast

Hello Marc,

I completely agree with you that the piano's sound you desire has everything to do with recording technique.

Upon reviewing many Youtube videos of Elton John, I noticed most of the time, his piano lid was closed or nearly closed. (As an aside, Billy Joel, Barry Manilow and others frequently perform in public with their pianos' lids completely closed.)  On a few occasions, the piano lid was completely removed, yet the sound was distinctively that of an Elton John piano.

His recording engineer's secret is quite possibly found in the Helpinstill piano pickup that does not use a microphone per se, but has long bars of pickup mechanisms placed very, very closely to the strings.  Thus, the same "Elton John sound" is produced because the electric guitar-type pickup does not rely on sound traveling any distance through air, whatsoever,  to reach a conventional microphone; in other words, the piano sounds much the same despite having the piano lid closed, partially opened or occasionally completely removed. 

Please have a look at the following URL, where Elton John, Billy Joel, Barry Manilow and other performing artists are specifically mentioned as using these unusual pickup devices for the past several decades.  These particular pickups are similar to guitar pickups, in that they generate a signal from the vibrational movement of the steel strings, rather than having a conventional diaphragm (as in a regular microphone) that picks up sound waves in the air.  This pickup scheme being very similar to a non-microphonic guitar pickup has the advantage of zero audio crosstalk between piano sensor pickup and the performer's vocal microphone.

http://www.helpinstill.com/

Click on the video on the Helpinstill website to view the geometry of the pickup and watch how the pickup is installed in a grand piano.

* * * * * * *

Regarding a Pianoteq emulation, I do not have a specific .fxp file to send you, but it does appear that any emulation of an Elton John / Helpinstill pickup would involve the pickup to be extremely close to the strings. 


In particular, one might wish to use four or all five pickups, with the first one or two placed about 1/6th of the distance along the string away from the bass note strings' hitchpins, and place one or two others near where the dampers of the midrange strings would be, and the remaining one or two pickups in a way that captures all of the high notes -- this is to evenly capture the sound of all of the strings.  One can adjust the volume and panning (or lack of panning) of these closely spotted pickup points that captures all of the notes of the piano with equal intensity.

I would also agree with EvilDragon's assessment that Pianoteq's own reverb would be shut off, but with an additional detail that the signal gets fed through a third party electronic reverb unit, either hardware reverb unit or a virtual reverb unit, rather than an emulation of any particular room environment.

Hope this helps.

Cheers,

Joe

Last edited by jcfelice88keys (06-02-2010 07:25)

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

Wow, fantastic community. It's great to have many reactions so quickly.

I just uploaded a short mp3 file "Intimate Pianos" with 3 short fragments (a few measures) illustrating some piano sounds.

http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.p...Pianos.mp3

Please don't misunderstand me. I don't claim that those are "good" piano sounds. For example, in most songs of Elton John's the bright and open piano sound that I am hearing "by default" in Pianoteq would be excellent. But these are two softer songs ("Your Song" & "Sorry are the hardest words to say") where a darker tone was used. The 3rd fragment is from the Tord Gustavsen Trio. It is a bit extreme but again a very intimate sound indeed.

Marc for Azure Feast.
www.AzureFeast.com

PS: I am still running the demo and I cannot load .fxp that were made with older models. (C1, C2, M1, M2...)

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

I've made a test fxp with all mics under the lid (lid half opened) to see if a recording technique like Joe described would be possible...
I had to put up the reverb to keep the sound 'alive' a bit... ( i wanted it to play in the standalone version)

http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.p...mate01.fxp

what do you think?

cheers
Hans

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

creart wrote:

I've made a test fxp with all mics under the lid (lid half opened) to see if a recording technique like Joe described would be possible...
I had to put up the reverb to keep the sound 'alive' a bit... ( i wanted it to play in the standalone version)

what do you think?

cheers
Hans

Hello Hans,

Perhaps I was a bit unclear, regarding reverb.  No implication was made  that the Pianoteq emulation should have zero reverb; rather, that an electronic reverb unit, such as a Lexicon or similar hardware unit's reverb should be used in place of Pianoteq's reverb.  Otherwise, the piano emulation would sound "dead" if there were not some form of sound enhancement in place Pianoteq's squelched reverb.

Cheers,

Joe

P.S.  What am I doing up at 3:30AM local time?

Last edited by jcfelice88keys (05-02-2010 10:34)

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

Joe,
Do you think the Helpinstill pickup would be used for studio recordings very often? I.e - when we listen to studio recordings of Elton, for example, are we often hearing the Helpinstill?

For an intimate sound in Pianoteq I like using the Binaural mic configuration, with the head right down near the harp.

AzureFeast: I like all your example recordings - that's the kind of sound I enjoy playing. 

Another very nice intimate (albeit reverberant) recording is "Carol Of The Bells", played by Isadar. (it's in iTunes)

Greg.

Last edited by skip (05-02-2010 10:51)

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

indeed Joe - you should go to bed... and I should get on with my work ... but I wanted to do a very rough thingy with that 'intimateC3' so here it is...
timing stinks btw...
and I did understand the need for reverb alright but wanted to keep it within PT for now....

http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.p...timate.mp3

Last edited by creart (05-02-2010 10:51)

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

creart wrote:

indeed Joe - you should go to bed... and I should get on with my work ... but I wanted to do a very rough thingy with that 'intimateC3' so here it is...
timing stinks btw...
and I did understand the need for reverb alright but wanted to keep it within PT for now....

http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.p...timate.mp3

Wow! Amazing! I have not had the time to try out your .fxp yet. But this sound nails down very well the idea I had about intimate. I am curious to look at your preset to understand exactly what you did change. But I am amazed at how you were able to flex Pianoteq to sound like that.

I think I am sold. :-)

Marc.
www.AzureFeast.com

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

Thanx Marc!
Well - Joe's comment about this Helpinstill pickups made me think if we could mimic it with PT's mics so I divided the 5 mics over the whole of the piano 'harp' - all under the lid and closed the lid a bit...
I also turned the hammer values down a bit and that's it...

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

Hey, I am even more amazed now that I played with it and looked at the settings.

It sounds quite exactly like I wanted.

Furthermore it plays really nicely. It keeps the dynamic qualities of Pianoteq while giving a sound that is closer to what (I think) some people prefer on some TruePianos presets. That really closes the discussion for me. I think Pianoteq should include your preset as a demo. It would reassure people that find PT too bright and metallic.

Now I was also amazed at the setting that you have used! I was expecting to see some EQ to cut off the high frequency. But you did just the opposite. That seems to mean that the key change is the mic position indeed.

Regards,

Marc for Azure Feast.

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

Cool
Yes, microphone placement does a great deal to the sound as it would in a real situation - sometimes I have the feeling that PTs mics respond even stronger than real ones but in any case there's a lot to be done by just fiddling about with the mics without doing anything else - although ofcourse hammer hardness also helped here...

cheers
Hans

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

creart wrote:

I've made a test fxp with all mics under the lid (lid half opened) to see if a recording technique like Joe described would be possible...
I had to put up the reverb to keep the sound 'alive' a bit... ( i wanted it to play in the standalone version)

http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.p...mate01.fxp

what do you think?

cheers
Hans

Nice mic settings and sound. But LOUD on the first midi file I tried it with.  I like the control it gives, too: turning any mic off gives a new similar sound. I'd tried putting mics along the harp before, but I never got this good a sound--never occurred to me lay down five mics that way. Seriously good.

Last edited by Jake Johnson (05-02-2010 17:37)

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

Yes Jake, I did hear (afterwards) that it is quite loud, so I would need to compensate for that..
Joe's discussion about this piano recording system got me to trying this and it worked out nicely

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

AzureFeast wrote:

Hey, I am even more amazed now that I played with it and looked at the settings.

It sounds quite exactly like I wanted.

Furthermore it plays really nicely. It keeps the dynamic qualities of Pianoteq while giving a sound that is closer to what (I think) some people prefer on some TruePianos presets. That really closes the discussion for me. I think Pianoteq should include your preset as a demo. It would reassure people that find PT too bright and metallic.

Now I was also amazed at the setting that you have used! I was expecting to see some EQ to cut off the high frequency. But you did just the opposite. That seems to mean that the key change is the mic position indeed.

Regards,

Marc for Azure Feast.


Hello All,

Each week, I grow more amazed at the flexibility of the Pianoteq physically modeled piano, and how it responds essentially exactly as its "real" conterpart.  Many, many kudos to Philippe and his programming team.

Until last night, I didn't know anything about the Helpinstill technology.  Rather, I went to Youtube and noticed that, despite, various artists' piano lids being (mainly) closed, partially open, or completely removed, the pianos' sounds were nearly the same. 

The above observations got me thinking:  "I do not see any conventional microphones positioned in, under or around the piano case, and it must be impossible that the singer's microphone is picking up the piano's sound."

A quick Google search of "piano microphone" led me to two sources, of which one was the Helpinstill product.  It was a cinch, once I watched the video and later read that Elton John, Billy Joel, Barry Manilow and others have used this technology for decades.

It is absolutely stunning that the Pianoteq responds to five microphones placed very closely to the strings, around the inside of the piano, and is able to capture a type of sound that has otherwise remained elusive to more conventional microphone setups.

Glad to be of help. 

Joe

Last edited by jcfelice88keys (06-02-2010 18:38)

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

FWIW, according to this web page: http://www.queenconcerts.com/instruments/piano.html
Queen used the Helpinstill on the "Magic" tour.  If this is correct, then there is a good chance that this recording uses the Helpinstill:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YukxqNfI3zA
(Queen - Live In Budapest (Magic Tour) - part 7)

The bass notes sometimes sound a bit like a CP70/80 electric grand.  There was a demo recording on the Helpinstill web site of a "sampled Helpinstill" product a while ago, which sounded even more like an electric grand than this recording. (there doesn't seem to be any mention of this product there now)

Also, there is some discussion about the Helpinstill on the Northern Sounds forum, here:
http://northernsounds.com/forum/showthread.php?t=30704
and also here:
http://srforums.prosoundweb.com/index.p...msg_426291
Seems that even when using the pickup, a bit of mic sound was often blended in, to make the sound more natural.

Greg.

Last edited by skip (06-02-2010 02:33)

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

creart wrote:

Cool
Yes, microphone placement does a great deal to the sound as it would in a real situation - sometimes I have the feeling that PTs mics respond even stronger than real ones but in any case there's a lot to be done by just fiddling about with the mics without doing anything else - although ofcourse hammer hardness also helped here...

cheers
Hans

Well Hans, I think you're onto something - microphone placement is critical - that's been apparent for quite a while to both of us (do you think anyone else will pick up on this ).

I DL'd your "five microphones under the lid" fxp, and I really like it.  To my old ears, it is somewhat similar to my "two mics" setup.  The five mics add quite a bit of what I might call "depth" to the sound - it's a more complex sound than with two mics.  On the other hand, two mics is perhaps "cleaner" or sparer.  I did my comparison by turning off limiter and reverb.

The bottom line is that we have a lot to learn about the mics and your latest experiment will lead us to new ways to manipulate the sound.

Thanks for posting  your ideas - well worthwhile.

Glenn

PS - the Helpinstill technology has been around for quite a while.  It was discussed several years ago on the PG Music forum.  The only potential drawback is that it might pick up too much string sound and not enough soundboard sound - string sound by nature is metallic (it can't help but be), and soundboard sound should probably sound more "wooden".

The Helpinstill ad reads, ". . it senses string movements magnetically at the speed of light to produce a signal".  If this is true, it can't possibly pick up soundboard movement.

My previously mentioned analogy of the hard body guitar vs the acoustic guitar must also apply to the nature of piano sound.  When the string vibrations are transferred to the soundboard, it is inevitable that the wood will emphasize some frequencies and lessen others.  Wood has very different physical properties which affect the timbre (compare a vibraphone to a marimba).

G

Last edited by Glenn NK (06-02-2010 08:16)
__________________________
Procrastination Week has been postponed.  Again.

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

...still something missing...

I thought that the preset from CREART was it. It seems to be on my HiFi speakers. But on my studio monitor, there is still something that I miss.

Maybe my studio monitors are less flattering (or more revealing) than my Hi-FI speakers (That's what they are meant for after all)

But I have A/Bed again a lot this morning between PT and TP and I still feel that, even with that "intimate" preset, the initial sound (The initial string sound excluding teh hammer itself) of Pianoteq is too "empty" "metallic" compared to TruePianos (Diamond, Jazz) preset.

To get a "good" reference point I sat in front of my piano (Boston Upright 126), and ... ok there is decidedly no comparison between sitting in front of a decent piano and any of those models. But, besides all other considerations, the initial sound has more "body" (TP-style).



Regards,

Marc.

Last edited by AzureFeast (06-02-2010 12:21)

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

Hmm that's too bad Marc

I will go and try and get a bit closer to the sound of the recordings that you linked to - I don't give up that easily

cheers
Hans

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

AzureFeast wrote:

To get a "good" reference point I sat in front of my piano (Boston Upright 126), and ... ok there is decidedly no comparison between sitting in front of a decent piano and any of those models. But, besides all other considerations, the initial sound has more "body" (TP-style).


Regards,

Marc.

I doubt that any electronic reproduction/recording/emulation will ever produce the same sound as the real thing.

Aside from any weaknesses in the electronic signal chain, I doubt that any speaker system can stand up to the tonal accuracy of a good piano soundboard.

I've put good piano CD recordings through my DAW, and the sound doesn't even stand up to Pianoteq - and they're both using the same electronics to produce the sound (with the exception that the CD has been highly processed already).

Recording a piano with microphones is a very difficult job in itself with many variables that affect the outcome.  Some of the inaccuracy may be corrected by post-processing, but it's not perfect.

I'm starting to doubt the accuracy of sample sets (Synthogy, etc) in reproducing piano sound simply because a recorded piano cannot sound like the original sound that the pianist hears.

Glenn

__________________________
Procrastination Week has been postponed.  Again.

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

it seems to be pretty hard getting that sound..
anyway I liked the 'sorry' sound and tried to go for that...
I've uploaded a new 'intimate' version fxp and recorded the first 20 seconds or so of the song - it's there as midi and as mp3

(I think under 30secs we're in the clear and I played it myself)

http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.p...mate04.fxp
http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.p...=sorry.mid
http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.p...=sorry.mp3

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

Hi Hans,
I have tried to check your new preset. But I get an error version that the .fxp file is not the right version.

I am still using the demo for now. did you do something that would prevent me to load it?

KR,

Marc.

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

oops - error on my part , sorry...
will upload later - need to set the changes again in the good version...

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

I thought I'd tack this on this old thread.......

I've just come back from a Petula Clark concert, which was absolutely wonderful. 

Besides Petula herself, the piano sound was excellent. I noticed something very interesting - they had what appeared to be a sound shield around the drummer. It was a tall, transparent shield. It was obviously to prevent bleeding into the piano mics. (and I am confident the piano was mic'd - it sounded a bit too loud and clear for it not to have been).  I could not see the piano mics, but I could see the drum mics - they were mounted quite high, above the shield.  I don't go to concerts often at all, so I'm not sure how commonly this idea is used.  The overall sound was really top notch.

Greg.

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

Greg,

So you went 'Downtown'?   From that era, Dusty Springfield was, and still is my favorite, although she's no longer with us.

Cheers,
Michael

Last edited by Michael H (14-10-2010 20:09)

Re: More intimate pianos with Pianoteq?

AzureFeast wrote:

...still something missing...

I thought that the preset from CREART was it. It seems to be on my HiFi speakers. But on my studio monitor, there is still something that I miss.

Maybe my studio monitors are less flattering (or more revealing) than my Hi-FI speakers (That's what they are meant for after all)

But I have A/Bed again a lot this morning between PT and TP and I still feel that, even with that "intimate" preset, the initial sound (The initial string sound excluding teh hammer itself) of Pianoteq is too "empty" "metallic" compared to TruePianos (Diamond, Jazz) preset.

To get a "good" reference point I sat in front of my piano (Boston Upright 126), and ... ok there is decidedly no comparison between sitting in front of a decent piano and any of those models. But, besides all other considerations, the initial sound has more "body" (TP-style).



Regards,

Marc.

I recognize this, I was also surprised that the sustain pedal sound was so good but the basic piano sound, esp. the attack is lacking. I think in the first few millseconds that the hammer strikes the string there's something hard to model or computationally too intensive going on...