Topic: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

I wonder why Modartt doesn't make an output option that simulates the piano in real environment without simulating microphones?

The piano could be presented in its finest nuances without limiting itself to the spectrum of microphonations. Thus, I would like to hear the piano sounding on the speakers with all frequencies audible on a real piano.

The microphone limits these frequencies due to its placement in the acoustic field. So why does Pianoteq simulate microphones if it doesn't depend on samples?

A high-tech Physical Modeling piano that doesn't rely on sampling but relies on virtual microphones? Why?

Last edited by Professor Leandro Duarte (13-01-2020 17:04)
Respeito, Esforço e Sabedoria

Re: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

When Pianoteq 3.0 was first released, I got the impression the binaural mode is its software microphone alternative.  Also it will position pianos in a DAW mix intended for loud speakers!

Now you get realism, realistic recordings from industry microphones and these simulations MODARTT offers.  Although if it were me, I’d resist any temptation to label a microphone “perfect” somehow, perfect-omni or perfect-fig8  —because of religious reasons.  (Smile.)

Pianoteq 8 Studio Bundle, Pearl malletSTATION EM1, Roland (DRUM SOUND MODULE TD-30, HandSonic 10, AX-1), Akai EWI USB, Yamaha DIGITAL PIANO P-95, M-Audio STUDIOPHILE BX5, Focusrite Saffire PRO 24 DSP.

Re: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

Professor Leandro Duarte wrote:

I wonder why Modartt doesn't make an output option that simulates the piano in real environment without simulating microphones?

The piano could be presented in its finest nuances without limiting itself to the spectrum of microphonations. Thus, I would like to hear the piano sounding on the speakers with all frequencies audible on a real piano.

The microphone limits these frequencies due to its placement in the acoustic field. So why does Pianoteq simulate microphones if it doesn't depend on samples?

A high-tech Physical Modeling piano that doesn't rely on sampling but relies on virtual microphones? Why?

If you use "perfect omni" microphones in the Pianoteq microphones section (Standard and Pro versions), there are no limitations due to the microphone, the output is the exact value of the acoustic pressure generated by the acoustic field at the point where the microphone is located.

Re: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

Philippe Guillaume wrote:
Professor Leandro Duarte wrote:

I wonder why Modartt doesn't make an output option that simulates the piano in real environment without simulating microphones?

The piano could be presented in its finest nuances without limiting itself to the spectrum of microphonations. Thus, I would like to hear the piano sounding on the speakers with all frequencies audible on a real piano.

The microphone limits these frequencies due to its placement in the acoustic field. So why does Pianoteq simulate microphones if it doesn't depend on samples?

A high-tech Physical Modeling piano that doesn't rely on sampling but relies on virtual microphones? Why?

If you use "perfect omni" microphones in the Pianoteq microphones section (Standard and Pro versions), there are no limitations due to the microphone, the output is the exact value of the acoustic pressure generated by the acoustic field at the point where the microphone is located.


Philippe-

Would you consider adding a preset to each of the pianos set up as you have described?I generally don't muck about with the microphone placement and such, but would like to hear all the pianos set up as you described.

Re: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

tfort wrote:
Philippe Guillaume wrote:
Professor Leandro Duarte wrote:

I wonder why Modartt doesn't make an output option that simulates the piano in real environment without simulating microphones?

The piano could be presented in its finest nuances without limiting itself to the spectrum of microphonations. Thus, I would like to hear the piano sounding on the speakers with all frequencies audible on a real piano.

The microphone limits these frequencies due to its placement in the acoustic field. So why does Pianoteq simulate microphones if it doesn't depend on samples?

A high-tech Physical Modeling piano that doesn't rely on sampling but relies on virtual microphones? Why?

If you use "perfect omni" microphones in the Pianoteq microphones section (Standard and Pro versions), there are no limitations due to the microphone, the output is the exact value of the acoustic pressure generated by the acoustic field at the point where the microphone is located.


Philippe-

Would you consider adding a preset to each of the pianos set up as you have described?I generally don't muck about with the microphone placement and such, but would like to hear all the pianos set up as you described.

Several presets are using only perfect omnis, for example: Steinway D Home, C. Bechstein DG D 282, Ant. Petrof 275, Steingraeber E-272, Bluethner Model One BA, just to name a few.

Re: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

Indeed if you are considering a possible additional preset, to presumably each piano, I’d like eagerly to acquire it at a nominal sum and in some form of a microphone add-on value pack.

Another forum member has very successfully used a pair of AKG D202 microphones as an example.  David recorded the Concours International de Piano de Nice 2019 piano and sectional performances via those microphones unavailable to end users right now.  Although he inarguably is himself as much of a PIANOTEQ end user as anybody else who thankfully uses this magnificent software.

Our opinions, his and mine, differ about the Earthworks PM-40 Mic system  —whether or not it along with several other microphones can contribute significantly to anybody just beginning to learn about microphone placements in or out of PIANOTEQ.  Certainly, David is of the opinion it is expensive, while I feel if it were soon to become available only as part of an add-on pack inside PIANOTEQ, MODARTT might make it affordable to persons like me.  Those whose budgets are small.  Please, correct me if I'm wrong.

This discussion about microphones in broad usage outside PIANOTEQ softwares comes out of the User forum topic Valuable, large site for learning more about mic positions.  To which I may repost the below videos or just furnish links to them.  These do show the Earthworks PM-40 Mic system in a favorable light; each I've labeled from my impressions of them:

Last edited by Amen Ptah Ra (17-01-2020 00:28)
Pianoteq 8 Studio Bundle, Pearl malletSTATION EM1, Roland (DRUM SOUND MODULE TD-30, HandSonic 10, AX-1), Akai EWI USB, Yamaha DIGITAL PIANO P-95, M-Audio STUDIOPHILE BX5, Focusrite Saffire PRO 24 DSP.

Re: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

Amen Ptah Ra wrote:

... about the Earthworks PM-40 Mic system  [...] I feel if it were soon to become available only as part of an add-on pack inside PIANOTEQ, ...

Well, I think, it is already possible within PTQ (std/pro), since one can place perfect omni mics at the places where PM-40 has its mics. One of the great things of PM-40, if I understand it correctly, is that it has almost perfect omni mics. So, the real world should asymptote the modelled one.

Have a nice day & happy playin'

Yamaha CP33 -- Scarlett 2i2 -- Yamaha HS7 / Sennheiser HD650 -- PTQ 7 Std [Linux/OSX] -- Some instruments

Re: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

Philippe Guillaume wrote:
Professor Leandro Duarte wrote:

I wonder why Modartt doesn't make an output option that simulates the piano in real environment without simulating microphones?

The piano could be presented in its finest nuances without limiting itself to the spectrum of microphonations. Thus, I would like to hear the piano sounding on the speakers with all frequencies audible on a real piano.

The microphone limits these frequencies due to its placement in the acoustic field. So why does Pianoteq simulate microphones if it doesn't depend on samples?

A high-tech Physical Modeling piano that doesn't rely on sampling but relies on virtual microphones? Why?

If you use "perfect omni" microphones in the Pianoteq microphones section (Standard and Pro versions), there are no limitations due to the microphone, the output is the exact value of the acoustic pressure generated by the acoustic field at the point where the microphone is located.



After several analyzes, I can deduce that a physically modeled piano sounding through loudspeakers cannot sound like a real piano on a soundboard, however, it can sound perfectly like a real microphonized piano.

Another issue is that there is no way for a piano to sound through speakers if not through microphones. For this reason, Pianoteq uses algorithms that simulate miking.

Would this problem be solved if the Pianoteq had a special output for a flat surface acoustic transducer, to be fixed on a wooden board? Would it sound like a real piano?

Respeito, Esforço e Sabedoria

Re: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

Professor Leandro Duarte wrote:

Would this problem be solved if the Pianoteq had a special output for a flat surface acoustic transducer, to be fixed on a wooden board? Would it sound like a real piano?

https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=7045

Re: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

Philippe Guillaume wrote:
tfort wrote:
Philippe Guillaume wrote:

If you use "perfect omni" microphones in the Pianoteq microphones section (Standard and Pro versions), there are no limitations due to the microphone, the output is the exact value of the acoustic pressure generated by the acoustic field at the point where the microphone is located.


Philippe-

Would you consider adding a preset to each of the pianos set up as you have described?I generally don't muck about with the microphone placement and such, but would like to hear all the pianos set up as you described.

Several presets are using only perfect omnis, for example: Steinway D Home, C. Bechstein DG D 282, Ant. Petrof 275, Steingraeber E-272, Bluethner Model One BA, just to name a few.

Does the output stereophonic mode use perfect omnis microphones on all acoustic instruments?

Respeito, Esforço e Sabedoria

Re: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

Gilles wrote:
Professor Leandro Duarte wrote:

Would this problem be solved if the Pianoteq had a special output for a flat surface acoustic transducer, to be fixed on a wooden board? Would it sound like a real piano?

https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=7045


Thanks. I already knew this topic.

But I do not believe that an output based on microphones (stereophonic, monophonic, sound recording, binaural) is appropriate for an acoustic transducer, since the original oscillator must simulate a real harmonic board of a piano since it is not a membrane of speaker, but on a wooden surface.

Last edited by Professor Leandro Duarte (20-01-2020 21:41)
Respeito, Esforço e Sabedoria

Re: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

Professor Leandro Duarte wrote:
Philippe Guillaume wrote:
tfort wrote:

Philippe-

Would you consider adding a preset to each of the pianos set up as you have described?I generally don't muck about with the microphone placement and such, but would like to hear all the pianos set up as you described.

Several presets are using only perfect omnis, for example: Steinway D Home, C. Bechstein DG D 282, Ant. Petrof 275, Steingraeber E-272, Bluethner Model One BA, just to name a few.

Does the output stereophonic mode use perfect omnis microphones on all acoustic instruments?

Here are the mics used in  output stereophonic mode:
YC5: DPA4006,
Bechstein DG, Grotrian, Steinway B, Steingraeber, Ant. Petrof: U87-fig8,
Celesta, Glockenspiel, Marimba, Vibraphone V-M, Xylophone, Toy piano: perfect-fig8,
all other instruments: perfect omnis.

Re: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

Philippe Guillaume wrote:
Professor Leandro Duarte wrote:
Philippe Guillaume wrote:

Several presets are using only perfect omnis, for example: Steinway D Home, C. Bechstein DG D 282, Ant. Petrof 275, Steingraeber E-272, Bluethner Model One BA, just to name a few.

Does the output stereophonic mode use perfect omnis microphones on all acoustic instruments?

Here are the mics used in  output stereophonic mode:
YC5: DPA4006,
Bechstein DG, Grotrian, Steinway B, Steingraeber, Ant. Petrof: U87-fig8,
Celesta, Glockenspiel, Marimba, Vibraphone V-M, Xylophone, Toy piano: perfect-fig8,
all other instruments: perfect omnis.

Thanks.

However, if the omnis perfect shows no loss of frequency and shows the sound at real pressure, what is the reason for using other models in different instruments for the stereophonic output?

Respeito, Esforço e Sabedoria

Re: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

Professor Leandro Duarte wrote:
Philippe Guillaume wrote:
Professor Leandro Duarte wrote:

Does the output stereophonic mode use perfect omnis microphones on all acoustic instruments?

Here are the mics used in  output stereophonic mode:
YC5: DPA4006,
Bechstein DG, Grotrian, Steinway B, Steingraeber, Ant. Petrof: U87-fig8,
Celesta, Glockenspiel, Marimba, Vibraphone V-M, Xylophone, Toy piano: perfect-fig8,
all other instruments: perfect omnis.

Thanks.

However, if the omnis perfect shows no loss of frequency and shows the sound at real pressure, what is the reason for using other models in different instruments for the stereophonic output?

The other mics do not really loose anything in the frequency range, they rather add some particular color to the sound, which may suit or not, and as in painting, it is essentially an artistic/aesthetic choice.

Re: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

https://earthworksaudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/pm40-1550x950-1-1200x801.jpg

Engineered to allow open or closed lid miking, the PianoMic™ is ideal for a wide range of miking situations. In a recording studio with no other instruments, the PianoMic™ shines with the lid open. When in more crowded settings such as on a concert stage shared with other instruments, merely close the piano lid to isolate the piano and minimize leakage. In both scenarios the PianoMic™ will capture the piano with incredible detail.

At the heart of the PianoMic™ are two random incidence omnidirectional microphones, specifically designed for use inside of a piano, which is a diffuse sound field. This means that sound is coming at the microphones from multiple sources and multiple directions. A random-incidence microphone is designed to be placed within such a diffuse sound field and pick up sounds uniformly, whether they arrive at the front, the sides or the rear of the microphone. The PianoMic™ System achieves much of its remarkable performance through the use of specially designed, 40kHz random-incidence High Definition Microphones™. Because of the near-perfect omnidirectional polar response of the microphones and extraordinarily tight impulse response, the PianoMic™ picks up every note with consistently. So, the full range of the piano including the high and low strings will be reproduced with no hot spots.

The microphones exhibit no proximity effect, regardless of their distance from the piano strings or soundboard. The mics, when positioned close to the sound source, also provide incredible gain before feedback and can handle up to 148dB SPL.

Designed for minimal visibility, the PM40 PianoMic™ system mounts within the piano. The telescoping bar allows the PianoMic™ to be quickly and easily installed in nearly all grand pianos and to place the microphones close to or away from the dampers and get the exact sound desired.

Set on flexible goosenecks, the microphone capsules can be easily repositioned for optimal microphone placement.

Viridis wrote:
Amen Ptah Ra wrote:

... about the Earthworks PM-40 Mic system  [...] I feel if it were soon to become available only as part of an add-on pack inside PIANOTEQ, ...

Well, I think, it is already possible within PTQ (std/pro), since one can place perfect omni mics at the places where PM-40 has its mics. One of the great things of PM-40, if I understand it correctly, is that it has almost perfect omni mics. So, the real world should asymptote the modelled one.

https://earthworksaudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/pm40-1550x950-8-1200x801.jpg

Certainly, Viridis, you have simply stated the obvious about omni mics: anything is possible.

I want specifically to draw your attention to the small capsule of the microphone depicted in the above image.  You see essentially a microphone that is basically without a bulky base, an extra weight to fetter it or disrupt and impede any flow of sound waves (including early reverb reflections) that can occur immediately behind it  —as some of which in a very large sum might come while reflected from a piano lid itself.  It is plainly a tiny capsule which hovers er floats freely in the static space surrounding it.  Attached by a light-weight easily mobile gooseneck (that is) smaller in diameter than the actual mic capsule, it just appears unencumbered.  It is this construction engineered that might make its sound silky creamy smooth but buttery a flavor favored by me, personally.  (Smile.)

For a comparison, I worked laboriously at a Pianoteq preset and tried to approach (via the preset) some textures or coloration as described by Phillippe Guillaume  —but those specifically the Earthworks PM-40 Mic system can add to my palette: 

https://forum.modartt.com/file/bqyqqnh5

https://forum.modartt.com/download.php?id=3650

Have I come close?

While I may have come close to the Earthworks sound demonstrated within the video, I fear maybe I'm getting no brass ring.  If I'm honest I feel I missed the video's buttery smooth texture completely!  My preset pales.

Perhaps you'll want to have a try at it and prove your postulate you provide in your reply to me.  Anything is possible, you know!

Seriously, I'm just looking to augment the selection currently available to us (you and me) and other end users who are much like us.  They as artists (some recording artists) have sometimes to benefit from real world choices.  Some that today PIANOTEQ lacks.  Whether for sound reasons or merely the attitudes expressed solely from any acquiescence on the part of a fellow forum member such as yourself, it does (lack).

So, the real world should asymptote the modelled one.

Now I'm at a total loss for words.  (I need a minute.)

Ha and Eureka, I found them!  I've hoped that MODARTT kindly might update its PIANOTEQ with two (2) things:

  1. Cordially a loop feature addition to its interface, one that can permit you to hear parameter adjustments just as you're making them on a quite troublesome section, repeated over and over to you until you have its chords and notes off a modified piano preset sounding just right in your ears.

  2. New microphones with accompanying mic preamps for PIANOTEQ and PIANOTEQ PRO users who demand their presets have industry standard coloration used by very successful and well established audio engineers, those considered award winning professionals inside recording industry sessions. They in familiar surroundings rely on them!

Now let me state an obvious, also:

You know, graciously, MODARTT can do something despite any wanting only to maintain its image  —one of us and them.  After my using PIANOTEQ TRUE MODELLING about ten (10) years, nearly three (3) years ago when I posted my initial post at this forum, MODARTT followed up on it only five (5) months later with a playlist feature fitting my description almost to a tee.  (I've still though no convenient loop capability.)

I get it, it doesn't want to appear somehow favoring one end user or forum member over another.  Have to say that ain't good business.  Let's use er paint an analogy like Guillaume's.  Let's say a painter an artist, like a Pablo Picasso, steps into his neighborhood paint or artist supply store while requesting a paint brush about yay big and yea narrow.  You think maybe some salesperson is going to say, "Man we ain't got no brush like that right this minute, but if we do get any more requests for one, sure enough management is gonna requisition that sucker and stock it for all of you!”

Philippe Guillaume wrote:

The other mics do not really loose [sic] anything in the frequency range, they rather add some particular color to the sound, which may suit or not, and as in painting, it is essentially an artistic/aesthetic choice.

I have a confession to make: I am no saint by any means as I was a dope fiend in treatment facilities for four years of my life.  In one I lived in a house with a guy who had been a classically trained pianist before he was frontally lobotomized, simply because others found him disagreeable!  I'm saying this to say, I could care less or give a hill of beans whether or not piano models come with the name Stein in gold leaf painted or etched into some visual form obviously across them.  I just want to hear something like I hear in jazz recordings.  If some small addition of mics and preamps will help me someday to get to this end then I guess I'm all for it.  I need paint no picture.

Personally, I see only a win-win situation with this idea of mine, my just proposed new mic and separate preamp add-on packs idea!  And, I'm expecting no compensation, no monetary pay-off.  Well, maybe a free upgrade will do very nicely.

Last edited by Amen Ptah Ra (27-01-2020 01:03)
Pianoteq 8 Studio Bundle, Pearl malletSTATION EM1, Roland (DRUM SOUND MODULE TD-30, HandSonic 10, AX-1), Akai EWI USB, Yamaha DIGITAL PIANO P-95, M-Audio STUDIOPHILE BX5, Focusrite Saffire PRO 24 DSP.

Re: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

Based on Amen Ptah Ra's interesting experiments with adding the PM40 to PTQ, I did a little experimentation as well on a New York (-ish) Model B to match the video from Earthworks demoing the PM40 or PM40T (my understanding is they're the same system with a different bar to allow travel).  While I don't begin to think it's perfect or would replace what PTQ could do internally with the mic code, it offers another flavor of close miking for the community.

https://forum.modartt.com/file/7wukvwmi

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQx-dCtd3po

I can't measure as carefully how close mine matches it or not, especially since I don't have as much Jazz MIDI material as I do classical.  (Matching Cziffra to piano rolls of the same classical pieces was much easier than matching an improv clip with Gershwin's piano rolls.)

I found it most interesting, as I worked with the PTQ Mic engine in new ways, that turning on Level Compensation not only compensates the levels of microphones between each other but also between individual microphones and each note of the instrument, which was unexpected but extremely useful since the "pure" omnis seem to have some significant proximity effect if level compensation is off.  Hard panning the mics also made them feel a little more like the PM40s.  I also placed the mics farther away from the dampers, like Earthworks suggests in the manual, which seemed to even the tone as well.  Even with that change, the right side was getting too much volume, so I dialed it back.  I liked the 4 and 5 mic sound best, which makes me wonder if the 6.1 engine improvements to add more "air" to the sound mean that to emulate the distinct quality of the PM40, you need two sets of them in PTQ, so I left 2 pairs of PM40s and a room mic, if you miss room sound.

I would definitely love many more "colorations" of microphones in future PTQ releases.  I suspect that is something that we might see as 7.0 comes onto the horizon--whenever that is.

Here are a few other resources that may help with regard to the PM40 that I used while putting the preset together.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vRwiwj0vsI (good A/B tests on a Hallet Davis baby grand)
https://earthworksaudio.com/products/mi...ies/pm40t/ (Earthworks technical overview of the PM40)

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/2xHiPcCsm29R12HX4eXd4J
Pianoteq Studio & Organteq
Casio GP300 & Custom organ console

Re: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

I am already beginning to understand and accept the logic of virtual miking for physically modeled virtual pianos.

One preset that I admire a lot and consider a good example of using microphones is the "Steinway D Player Wide". It has a dark, massive sound, fat and firm, dirty and defined. In it I hear the perfect combination of wood, steel felt. This preset has been my favorite for some time now.

Philippe Guillaume could reveal the name of the designer who built this fabulous piano preset.

Respeito, Esforço e Sabedoria

Re: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

I see what you’re doing, Professor; and, I like it!

Pianoteq 8 Studio Bundle, Pearl malletSTATION EM1, Roland (DRUM SOUND MODULE TD-30, HandSonic 10, AX-1), Akai EWI USB, Yamaha DIGITAL PIANO P-95, M-Audio STUDIOPHILE BX5, Focusrite Saffire PRO 24 DSP.

Re: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

I thought PTQ would omnibus the mic settings into the FXP, which didn't seem to work.  So here are the mic settings for the Earthworks PM40 emulation:

https://forum.modartt.com/uploads.php?f...0PM40.mfxp

to go with https://forum.modartt.com/file/7wukvwmi

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/2xHiPcCsm29R12HX4eXd4J
Pianoteq Studio & Organteq
Casio GP300 & Custom organ console

Re: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

Professor Leandro Duarte wrote:
Philippe Guillaume wrote:
Professor Leandro Duarte wrote:

I wonder why Modartt doesn't make an output option that simulates the piano in real environment without simulating microphones?

The piano could be presented in its finest nuances without limiting itself to the spectrum of microphonations. Thus, I would like to hear the piano sounding on the speakers with all frequencies audible on a real piano.

The microphone limits these frequencies due to its placement in the acoustic field. So why does Pianoteq simulate microphones if it doesn't depend on samples?

A high-tech Physical Modeling piano that doesn't rely on sampling but relies on virtual microphones? Why?

If you use "perfect omni" microphones in the Pianoteq microphones section (Standard and Pro versions), there are no limitations due to the microphone, the output is the exact value of the acoustic pressure generated by the acoustic field at the point where the microphone is located.

After several analyzes, I can deduce that a physically modeled piano sounding through loudspeakers cannot sound like a real piano on a soundboard, however, it can sound perfectly like a real microphonized piano.

Another issue is that there is no way for a piano to sound through speakers if not through microphones. For this reason, Pianoteq uses algorithms that simulate miking.

Would this problem be solved if the Pianoteq had a special output for a flat surface acoustic transducer, to be fixed on a wooden board? Would it sound like a real piano?

Gilles wrote:
Professor Leandro Duarte wrote:

Would this problem be solved if the Pianoteq had a special output for a flat surface acoustic transducer, to be fixed on a wooden board? Would it sound like a real piano?

https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=7045

Thanks. I already knew this topic.

But I do not believe that an output based on microphones (stereophonic, monophonic, sound recording, binaural) is appropriate for an acoustic transducer, since the original oscillator must simulate a real harmonic board of a piano since it is not a membrane of speaker, but on a wooden surface.

Professor about any of the questions you pose and in particular, “Would this problem be solved if the Pianoteq had a special output for a flat surface acoustic transducer, to be fixed on a wooden board?” I’m sure, if MODARTT colorfully can create additional mics (modeled) in an effort to increase its visibility amongst discerning keyboardists, by the broadened spectrum of mic model selection for current and future pianos, and, artistic purposes, especially, it just as importantly can surface modeled transducers themselves and make them output options as well.

I sit at my modest MIDI capable entry level digital piano.  It’s a YAMAHA DIGITAL PIANO P-95 with a silver colored finish that beautifully matches an iMac, its keyboard and trackpad, M-AUDIO STUDIOPRO 4 monitors and various small kitchen appliances (rice cooker, ice cream maker, soy milk maker, Etc.) also setup in a kitchenette area.  (I may provide pictures later.)  While I am no decision making CEO certainly, I do as an end user (who really likes to hear music) wonder if a company such as MODARTT will ever decide to model transducers, if it as an entity can become induced to do so.  Even if it does for the big players the kind you find in orchestras like the Berliner Philharmoniker (with its Steingraeber), small piano manufactures and municipal symphonies might benefit too from this sort of a four and a half (4 1/2) generation transducer thingy.

Whenever MODARTT does, a small player who sits at his or her baby grand in a home will have the ability to change the temperament of that acoustic as quickly as one does the Steingraeber.  That is if makers of PNOscan and others get onboard also.  Some professional installation is necessary.  (Have to set up a board meeting?)

I am already beginning to understand and accept the logic of virtual miking for physically modeled virtual pianos.

Hopefully, they possibly will get together as soon as I get an Earthworks system modeled inside Pianoteq and you get the name of the creator of that preset along with presets made by other known producers and Grammy winners!

Philippe Guillaume could reveal the name of the designer who built this fabulous piano preset.

Last edited by Amen Ptah Ra (09-02-2020 10:22)
Pianoteq 8 Studio Bundle, Pearl malletSTATION EM1, Roland (DRUM SOUND MODULE TD-30, HandSonic 10, AX-1), Akai EWI USB, Yamaha DIGITAL PIANO P-95, M-Audio STUDIOPHILE BX5, Focusrite Saffire PRO 24 DSP.

Re: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

Professor Leandro Duarte wrote:

Philippe Guillaume could reveal the name of the designer who built this fabulous piano preset.

I'd like to, but unfortunately I can't remember the story of that preset, whether it was designed by our team or by the beta testers during a beta session (it happens also that several people contribute to some given preset). If ever I have something new, I will let you know for sure.

Re: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

These presets sound wonderful, Amen and tm.

And thanks for keeping alive the idea of addon mics and producer packs. The IKMultimedia program Amplitube suggests that this could be aesthetically and commercially viable.

One other request--that in modelling mics, all of their features and response patterns be included. For the nicely-modelled AKG C414, we only have their cardioid pattern. Here's a video of using two AKG 414's to mic a grand, sometimes using their omni pattern. (The video loses synch with the audio near the end, but he gets a great piano sound.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNI0uufktUc

Re: Microphone Piano X Physical Modeling

Jake, I was trying honestly to show the frugality of any attempt to match a sound of a piano miked in PIANOTEQ, to that of the piano miked via the Earthworks PM-40 Mic system.  This effort is at best a hard one, too hard to ever result satisfactorily with respect to PIANOTEQ!

For one, unlike PIANOTEQ, The PianoMic™ System achieves much of what it does through its use of what Earthworks has termed ‘specially designed, 40kHz random-incidence High Definition Microphones™.’

Which markedly are unavailable strictly inside PIANOTEQ pianos.

However, on one hand your very own instance of piano microphones —even if in fact the virtual ones at hand were modeled very accurately by MODARTT— already came to you with otherwise some set predetermined headroom, possibly terminating in a ceiling (that is) none higher than 20kHz allotted within the given range of frequencies allowed namely from the original mic models themselves, and, by specifically their own hardware manufacturers.  So by no small reasoning, 20kHz appears the software absolute maximum high frequency that has been permitted er omitted by an unacknowledged (before) bottle neck, that is, to the present mics given within reach of the software, and, according to mic specs whether or not you are a user who got PIANOTEQ PRO even with whatever much higher ‘internal’ sample rates suggested: but only in now a limited capability simply because of specifically that microphone 20kHz constant ceiling I‘m bringing to your attention.  Only that right now is my single drawn conclusion; perhaps too that’ll become yours as another end user’s.

Also that to me seems something of an argument or a probable case for any other end users and for MODARTT itself to debate at likely a possible future date if it is ever to allow anybody to exceed honestly current 20kHz modeled microphones’ limits or amply utilize to the fullest, any of its PIANOTEQ selections without incurring the question ability of alleged available higher sample rates via any more capable microphones, or one at least that is truly capable already of a higher rate as advertised, such like one found in The PianoMic™ System that is. 

As a microphone setup it appears not just any but simply the only system offered that is all ready to take full advantage of frequencies above 20kHz and record them at a piano instrument as flawlessly as it was intended.

Although ultimately the both of the piano products organizations might still claim the microphones were perfected or have been near perfect all along:

At the heart of the PianoMic™ are two random incidence omnidirectional microphones, specifically designed for use inside of a piano, which is a diffuse sound field. This means that sound is coming at the microphones from multiple sources and multiple directions. A random-incidence microphone is designed to be placed within such a diffuse sound field and pick up sounds uniformly, whether they arrive at the front, the sides or the rear of the microphone. The PianoMic™ System achieves much of its remarkable performance through the use of specially designed, 40kHz random-incidence High Definition Microphones™. Because of the near-perfect omnidirectional polar response of the microphones and extraordinarily tight impulse response, the PianoMic™ picks up every note with consistently. So, the full range of the piano including the high and low strings will be reproduced with no hot spots.

The microphones exhibit no proximity effect, regardless of their distance from the piano strings or soundboard. The mics, when positioned close to the sound source, also provide incredible gain before feedback and can handle up to 148dB SPL.

I just feel, even as a corporate body, you’ve always room for improvement, Jake.

Whether or not the microphones are anyway perfect the sounds of them exactly to the extent which I’ve already heard I do like. 

Man, and I enjoy a lot!


Edit; change of a noun determiner, from an article ‘an’ into ‘a’.

Last edited by Amen Ptah Ra (13-06-2021 18:06)
Pianoteq 8 Studio Bundle, Pearl malletSTATION EM1, Roland (DRUM SOUND MODULE TD-30, HandSonic 10, AX-1), Akai EWI USB, Yamaha DIGITAL PIANO P-95, M-Audio STUDIOPHILE BX5, Focusrite Saffire PRO 24 DSP.