Topic: ”Beauty”, by the rules - music theory

Playing my piece ”Beauty””, a little by the rules,( I got advise first time in my life about chords, progression, music theory). I think, in some way, music has no rules. But in music theory, there are rules. Have not been thinking much about music theory when making my pieces. I improvise/play much from intuition and what I have learned myself, and express my emotions ( happy, sad, thankful, crying, laughing….) because my teacher never told anything about chords.…..So, intuition or theory? Or both?  - I think maybe I’m just going to keep doing what I’m doing and enjoy myself playing Pianoteq  :-)
Feel free to leave comments that you feel might be of interest to the readers/listeners.
https://youtu.be/mDiqv7ycTCg

Re: ”Beauty”, by the rules - music theory

Pianoteqenthusiast wrote:

Playing my piece ”Beauty””, a little by the rules,( I got advise first time in my life about chords, progression, music theory). I think, in some way, music has no rules. But in music theory, there are rules. Have not been thinking much about music theory when making my pieces. I improvise/play much from intuition and what I have learned myself, and express my emotions ( happy, sad, thankful, crying, laughing….) because my teacher never told anything about chords.…..So, intuition or theory? Or both?  - I think maybe I’m just going to keep doing what I’m doing and enjoy myself playing Pianoteq  :-)
Feel free to leave comments that you feel might be of interest to the readers/listeners.
https://youtu.be/mDiqv7ycTCg

   I used to wonder how Mozart could compose music that sounded happy and sad at the same time. My little theory is that he simply mixed Major and Minor notes and served them gently stirred but not shaken .Maybe not a rule but at least some genuine organisation . No rules becomes a cloud . Happiness --every cloud has a silver lining . Sadness--At the end of the day a cloud is still a cloud .

Re: ”Beauty”, by the rules - music theory

Thank you for your interesting comments.

Re: ”Beauty”, by the rules - music theory

Thank you Pianoteqenthusiast! Always heartfelt.

It's up to you - whether or not you want to study theory. I'll bet The Beatles knew very little - likely an advantage in their case - although their manager knew some.

I think that theory can go on and on ... and on ... with nothing artistically meaningful being done. I would expect that very few "music theorists" have composed much of lasting impact. On the other hand, to progress to the next level, it's another tool that possibly can be used to your advantage. For example, the two greatest artists, Mozart and Bach, understood theory at the deepest level (the same can be said of many of the great composers). Part of their genius, it was child's play to them. They did not have to extensively "study" it in a formal way  - they mainly discovered it for themselves. I think that as long as you enjoy learning something, it's probably going to pay back dividends. Personally, the formal study of theory - from textbooks - is not for me!

Re: ”Beauty”, by the rules - music theory

This is great thoughts and ”guidance”, advise, information. Thank you for thinking of me and taking the time to be kind and write all this. I’ll think about it. If you could see my face, you’d see the smile you put on it. Thanks honjr!