Beto-Music wrote:The random aspects of wood patter perhaps it's the final frontier of modelled technology.
You are probably right ...
Beto-Music wrote:It's already very close to the real thing, making most people very pleased. Maybe the very little difference that remain, and bother just a very few ultra hard critic persons, it's exactly what in real world it's connect to random aspects of texture among the layers of wood, veins and grains, variances in density...
I don’t think this "limit" of Pianoteq will bother anyone, but in fact, this small number of ultra hard critic persons would be very glad to be able to choose between several models of pianos according to their repertoire or their mood of the day.
We mustn’t forget that it is also thanks to ultra hard critic persons like Leif Ove Andsnes (and many others) that the Steinway & Sons company perfects more and more its products to achieve excellence. This is especially what makes their great reputation.
Why then close Pianoteq’s doors to persons like Leif Ove Andsnes, who could never choose the character (the individuality) of their piano?
Beto-Music wrote:Thanks for reply. I imagined something like that, but not a complete "haricut limitation" but partial limitation.
Yes, I almost agree with you.
The design and voicing options of Pianoteq Pro already allow you to do a lot of things, even if they don’t yet allow you to change wood pieces, etc.
I’m not sure, but I seem to have read somewhere on the Pianoteq website that the modelling process included the restitution of the manufacturing and wear defects of the original instrument. I think this is particularly the case on the historical instruments of the Kremseeg collection where some parts and keyboard keys were damaged.
Which should logically be the same with modern Pianoteq pianos.
Here a piano duo recording test that we made with the Steinway Model D, trying to give a different personality for the two pianos:
https://soundcloud.com/modelling-audio-...-master-eq
Here, the recording context:
http://modelling-audio-expert.com/how-t...ter-track/
Here is a harp quartet recording test ... We also tried to give individuality to each of the harps with Pianoteq's tuning, voicing and design options; but for me, that doesn’t change very much. My ears hear exactly the same harp, with only a different 'haircut'.
https://soundcloud.com/modelling-audio-...g-mastered
Here, the recording context:
http://modelling-audio-prod.com/experim...iner-saal/
http://modelling-audio-expert.com/how-t...recording/
Beto-Music wrote:It would be way too expensive to analise 5 Steingraeber E-272, for example.
Only Modartt has the answer to this question, but I’m sure that if they succeed in captivating the interest of pianists like Leif Ove Andsnes by modeling 5 different Steinway pianos, the cost won’t have much more importance compared to their profitability and reputation.
Last edited by Modelling Audio Prod (23-06-2018 10:38)