Topic: Consistency of timbre across each note....

Hello all, this is my first post.

I have downloaded the trial version of PT 6/Standard version. I am fully intrigued by this wonderful modeled piano....but I have a question about the consistency of the notes across the board...it seems that some of the notes when played at full velocity lack a little 'bite' and/or volume of the immediate surrounding notes.

For instance, (using the basic Steinway D Prelude preset) A4 seams slighter louder than G4 or B4, and when you go from F1 to G1 to A1, G1 sounds a bit duller in timbre that the whole notes flanking it.

I'm OCD about this stuff, but I noticed it even after calibrating my Yamaha P255, which has a very decent feel and velocity curve out of the box.

It's not the midi controller though..I've tried setting the velocity curve in Pianoteq to where every note is played at a full 127 midi velocity to test what I though I was hearing (pushing the far left node all the way up, so every note is played at 127 velocity regardless of how hard or soft the keys are played, kind of like the response you would want from a harpsichord).

This forced 'full on' velocity curve rules out the midi controller, but I can still hear the differences described above.

My thought process was the fact that is a full on physically modeled piano, being able to track all levels of velocity, there would be a 'perfect' timbre/response/bite as you play harder and across all notes.

I want to love this modeled piano, as it is quite amazing, but does anyone else hear what I'm talking about, or am I just being to picky about it?

Last edited by djejpiano (11-05-2018 01:40)

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

Have you tested your MIDI controller (Yamaha P255) with other piano softwares with rich velocity levels per key?

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

Well, the controller is not part of the situation, because I'm testing all notes at 127 velocity....

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

Which is highly unrealistic of course, nobody would actually play things consistently at velocity 127 all the time. Plus, timbral variations are a normal thing on the real piano as well...

Hard work and guts!

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

True, but I noticed while playing normally...just testing the anomaly..

Last edited by djejpiano (11-05-2018 16:56)

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

Personally, from six decades of playing the piano, I can attest there is, for the most part, more variability in most normal players' own differences in playing strength of all ten fingers (including thumbs) than one would notice in a real piano -- excluding outright damage or regulating defects in a real piano.  What I gather is that the variability noticed in the Steinway D Play preset ... comes as the result of other electronically processed instruments being artificially "too uniform" from note to note.

Disclaimer:  I am excluding the masterful techniques of world-class pianists such as Rubenstein, Serkin, Gould and Brendel et al, who ARE able to repeatedly and reproducibly detect slight differences in an otherwise well-regulated piano's behavior.  Restated, my opinions are meant to address normal everyday amateur- and other musicians who make a living playing the piano.

Cheers,

Joe

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

Yeah, you've found this problem just like what I have noticed. After some experiments on pianoteq, I can tell you something more interesting. First of all, it's easy to find in preset "Steinway D Prelude", there are volume variation throughout the keyboard.(you can see it in Note-Edit window.) So adjust this note by note to tame the louder notes. As for timbre, I've found that even though you adjust all parameters of two different presets to the same, they still sound different in some notes. I've tried to make a "Steinway D Prelude" from "Steinway D Home". After adjusting all the things the same as "Steinway D Prelude", it's obvious that G2 is much more stuffy than F2. But in genuine "Steinway D Prelude", The difference between G2 and F2 is less obvious than "Steinway D Prelude" made from "Steinway D Home". Generally, genuine "Prelude" does even better in timbre consistency. I guess that there are some minor adjustments in "Steinway D Prelude" preset, and file sizes also proved this. I think more details only can be seen in Pro version.

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

I wonder if you're missing out a lot of other complicating factors.

Headphones and speakers and even the electronics (and ears) they are connected to can have many complex acoustic and electronic interactions which can produce uneven frequency responses.  You could be picking up something like that.  If you use speakers you can have issues with unusual resonances in the room.

Do you get the same effect with headphones and speakers (or different headphones) ?

Have you tried looking analyzing the wav output in an audio tool like Audacity ?

StephenG

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

I appreciate all the replies

I'm approaching this in a much more technical aspect. When I play a note 'hard', I want the same 'bite' with each note, hence my initial post. I want this modeled piano to behave accordingly, but when playing and using my, well, 'well behaved' piano controller, I've discovered some anomalies.

Putting all the velocities at the same value, I noticed variations across the keybed. I really don't think there should be a timbre or volume difference between 3 keys next to each other, but that's what I'm experiencing personally.

I understand that there is subtle variations of a 'real' piano, but there's something to be said about the variations I'm hearing. Kudos to the quality of the modelling btw.

I don't think it's intentional, just noticed it while playing. My 2 cents.

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

Hi djejpiano,

I can't reproduce this - can we please hear an example?

Help us get to the much more technical side of this with you. To me the Steinway D and B are both stunning in their character in Pianoteq, as close to perfection as I can imagine (with my own DAW environment, I'm approaching heavenly levels of satisfaction) - I am still many years away from truly "learning" these pianos in the way Joe describes, and can't claim to be anything of a profound genius but I try - and keep trying - and like so many others here, we all have interesting ideas - surely we can discern opinion from flaw.

Could you upload an MP3 here? I'm a recent convert to this obviousness - it helps others to understand. Words, no matter how many just can't cut it.

Maybe a file playing 3 repetitions of A4, then a gap, then continue the same for G4 and B4 - then same format for F1 G1 A1?

Maybe one file all at 33, another all at 67 and another at gulp, 127?

Lower F1 - is that where the brass wound strings finish? Steel from there up? A point with less strain, with higher tension on the smaller strings following that point? Not sure about a D model.

The upper, is that at the point where the damper is off? You can adjust this in Pianoteq, if that's what you're hearing.

Can the virtual mic be moved? (Pro)

Strike point?

Condition slider fully left?

Turn down PT volume (bottom out to like minus 20 and find something up or down from there - a cool signal I find gives far greater headroom for recording than a hot signal - if you don't need a hot signal for an amp or old tube equipment, tone it down - you can add junk into the signal, including a feeling of ear-busting midrange which might be somewhat like being at a grand - but not great for a "stage" recording or studio recording "feel" - YMMV - but think of these things, as you see/hear them)

All the things such as speaker distance - I assume you've thought through and compared to other instruments emanating these exact (have to be quite exact - ringing in the room can have profound dips and peaks all across the spectrum). Rule those things out first of course.

Could be anything from the thousands of components in the real instrument supplied - I find it and the others unexpectedly enjoyable - and in a real world situation, money permitting, I'd want them all. Would be happy to find something factual to look forward to being improved - but feeling Joe and others might be more in my way of thinking.

Can't be understated, how much you can make a piano sound "your own" in a DAW. Don't just stop at with the standalone player, if you're extra fussy like many other Pianoteq lovers.

If you upload a clear demo djejpiano - happy to go listen to the D on my system (I've been making sound stages for quick project starting point in a couple of my most used DAWs - so I'm in the process of looking for improvements - or ruling out things merely based upon the tastes of others - cheers.

BTW - more thoughts (as if we need those) - You can flatten sound like a pancake and put sparkles on everything in a DAW or if you invest in Pro or Studio (all instruments) you can change almost everything you can imagine on any of the Pianoteq pianos or change anything you record in a DAW with Pianoteq as plugin - tools are made for this kind of thing. Regardless, it's inexpensive owning Pro or Studio, compared to purchase and upkeep on millions of dollars in real world pianos - embarrassingly so. I recommend it for fussy to pro users without hesitation - and whatever small changes you would like, it's still heads and shoulders over everything else IMO - and it's my opinion - just see so many people hyping things which I can't even put in the same category, so happy to keep saying how pleased I am with practically everything about Pianoteq. Don't let a perceived problem get you down - I know from experience that anything I want can be changed with the time and DAW and mostly in Piantoeq's Pro settings.

Agree with others here and many other similar threads - esp. loved Joe's comment - thank you Joe, always appreciate reading your thoughts!

Pianoteq Studio Bundle (Pro plus all instruments)  - Kawai MP11 digital piano - Yamaha HS8 monitors

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

Hi all,

I am pleased you guys are having this discussion here. I have been working for years (no exaggeration) on velocity consistency and can relate fully with this thread. May I suggest that you try lid position 0.76 and bring all variances in the note for note screen to level. I could post an .fxp and/or mp3
if anyone is interested I use the aforementioned settings with a velocity curve filter in version 2 of Cantabile VST Host.

Warmest Regards,

Chris

Last edited by sigasa (20-05-2018 19:39)

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

Hello everyone,

I'm also following this thread with great interest. I greatly appreciate reading all the responses so far :-)

In my quest for a "perfect" player perspective using Pianoteq in combination with a furniture digital piano and extra studio monitors I've also noticed some irregularities. Most of them seem to boil down to phase cancellations which I have learned is impossible to get rid of completely when stereo miking a grand piano.

After trying hundreds (no exaggeration...) of presets of different models/mic setups I haven't managed to create or find "the one preset to rule them all". All seem to have at least a few notes that sound off (most often it's a stereo imaging issue where a note would sound as if its from the wrong direction).

So, I've begun experimenting with running multiple Pianoteq instances to try and correct the notes that deviate. I do this by adding two Pianoteq instances to my VST host (Cantabile) and pan the first hard left and the other hard right. Both instances must start from the same preset. From there I try to identify troublesome notes as I play and then "fix" them by adjusting the left/right note volume and/or adjust the left/right balance of note frequencies. It takes a lot of time to do these adjustments and since I don't have an acoustic piano at home it's obviously harder to judge how close the feeling/sound is. I do however believe that my current setup is the closest I've ever been to having it sound as a real acoustic grand piano being played in my living room.

Has anyone else been experimenting with running multiple Pianoteq instances?
I can ofcourse upload a set of FXP's if anyone is interested in trying it out (please say yes, I'd love some feedback :-)).

Sigasa: I'm very interested in trying your FXP's - I haven't experimented anything with lid position yet.

Best regards,
Martin

Last edited by meper (21-05-2018 01:00)

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

I haven't had a chance to get back to the computer to try and tweak PT, but I will try all of the suggestions listed...once again, much appreciated!

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

sigasa wrote:

Hi all,

I am pleased you guys are having this discussion here. I have been working for years (no exaggeration) on velocity consistency and can relate fully with this thread. May I suggest that you try lid position 0.76 and bring all variances in the note for note screen to level. I could post an .fxp and/or mp3
if anyone is interested I use the aforementioned settings with a velocity curve filter in version 2 of Cantabile VST Host.

Warmest Regards,

Chris

Hi Chris

Are these settings for the pro version? I've poked around and can't find lid position or a variance in note for note setting (I'm using PT standard/trial, because I haven't committed to the purchase yet)...

thanks

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

Yes I believe you can adjust the lid in Standard, it's in with the mics. (kick me if wrong!)

Check here if not sure what's in Stage, Standard and Pro:

Pianoteq versions comparison table.

Some tweaking is available to Standard but not Note-per-note edit.

Standard lists as having Microphone settings - so this should be there:

Click the microphone icon near the centre of the Pianoteq interface just below/right of where it says "OUTPUT".

That takes you to the microphone edit section - the lid adjustments are in the main box on the right side - just hover over the arrows, click and move up or down. BTW, the mics are also as simple to edit, and you can also input exact numbers etc.

Edit

Whoops, there is no Pro demo version at this time


Having said that - I think you really do owe it to yourself to Demo the Pro version - attempt the note-by-note changes you seek, from the top of the thread, to find out how much more you can do in Pro.


End edit

I own Studio, which is Pro plus all instruments - worth saving up for if money is in the way. Like others are doing often, you can still buy Stage or Standard versions then upgrade later - no extra cost doing that but always check support beforehand to find out if that's changed.

There are very few software offerings this easy to buy, install, update and use, has a great user base on the forum etc. Worth it.

If you settle on Standard, this is worth knowing [as per page at link above]:

"Presets built with PIANOTEQ PRO can be loaded in PIANOTEQ Standard without limitation".

I have an inkling you'd be most happy with Pro but Standard is definitely more pliable than Stage.

If you jump in, djejpiano, I am sure you'll find that the water's pretty damn fine!

[edited to add last para, spelling, link, removed ref to Pro demo which doesn't exist!!]:

Yes Meper, loving the way Pianoteq instances are so well behaved in DAWs - multi tracked instances can create some formidable creative possibilities. There some recent posts on the forum about this kind of thing - would love to maybe continue this other thread (link) with DAW tips and FXP and so on? I kind of began that one for exactly this kind of thing. Cheers!

Last edited by Qexl (27-05-2018 04:21)
Pianoteq Studio Bundle (Pro plus all instruments)  - Kawai MP11 digital piano - Yamaha HS8 monitors

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

Qexl wrote:

Yes I believe you can adjust the lid in Standard, it's in with the mics. (kick me if wrong!)

Check here if not sure what's in Stage, Standard and Pro:

Pianoteq versions comparison table.

Some tweaking is available to Standard but not Note-per-note edit.

Standard lists as having Microphone settings - so this should be there:

Click the microphone icon near the centre of the Pianoteq interface just below/right of where it says "OUTPUT".

That takes you to the microphone edit section - the lid adjustments are in the main box on the right side - just hover over the arrows, click and move up or down. BTW, the mics are also as simple to edit, and you can also input exact numbers etc.

Having said that - I think you really do owe it to yourself to Demo the Pro version - attempt the note-by-note changes you seek, from the top of the thread, to find out how much more you can do in Pro.

I own Studio, which is Pro plus all instruments - worth saving up for if money is in the way. Like others are doing often, you can still buy Stage or Standard versions then upgrade later - no extra cost doing that but always check support beforehand to find out if that's changed.

There are very few software offerings this easy to buy, install, update and use, has a great user base on the forum etc. Worth it.

If you settle on Standard, this is worth knowing [as per page at link above]:

"Presets built with PIANOTEQ PRO can be loaded in PIANOTEQ Standard without limitation".

I have an inkling you'd be most happy with Pro but Standard is definitely more pliable than Stage.

If you jump in, djejpiano, I am sure you'll find that the water's pretty damn fine!

[edited to add last para, spelling, link]:

Yes Meper, loving the way Pianoteq instances are so well behaved in DAWs - multi tracked instances can create some formidable creative possibilities. There some recent posts on the forum about this kind of thing - would love to maybe continue this other thread (link) with DAW tips and FXP and so on? I kind of began that one for exactly this kind of thing. Cheers!


Thanks for the reply!
I'm sure that the pro version 'might' fill my needs, but I don't think that it's available for a demo download. I can only see PT standard for demo purposes.....copy and pasted from the PT homepage.....

Download a free trial of Pianoteq 6 Standard or Stage

So what I currently have is standard..

Last edited by djejpiano (27-05-2018 01:37)

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

Wow, yowtch! I've somehow missed that.

*Sorry djejpiano and others reading.* Trying to be helpful but overlooked this since day one it seems.

That pains me, I should have checked - I did precisely remember that we can click through to download "the demo" from the Pro version's details page "/pianoteq_pro" - perhaps that's why I recollect thinking I had demo'd the Pro version. That link only sends the user to the generic "/try" page.

I'll go add an edit note to my above comments. Also will shamelessly attempt to apply self effacing humour to my error, in a transparently pathetic attempt to playfully humiliate myself to recover at least some self esteem as I edge towards the door (and maybe a few chuckles and some "Hrmmph"-ing) and try to fix the situation by giving way too much thought to the situation at hand and then type it out as I go and posting for all to gloss over. Further to this, I would add that I must certainly be an idiot but just can't ever quite seem to confirm, maybe because.. idiocy (Aaand I would've gotteded a way with that to, if it wasn't four those metaling Duonning Kroogsters insects! Shakes fist - rattle rattle).

I quickly bought Pianoteq after just a little tweaking of the demo for an hour here and there, some years ago now - immediately saw the value of Pro - if I had my time again, I would have just got Studio first because there's nothing like being able to have at my disposal the entire collection of instruments without having to choose a few pianos) - but always recollect the demo containing Pro features - whereas it must have just been Standard? - unless there used to be a Pro demo?

Maybe Standard contains enough to get to terms with in a demo - any more detail and people would keep breaking their sound doing complex things which will obviously sound horrible unless you know a little more about exactly what you're doing with this or that Pro setting?

Whatever the reason for not demoing Pro features, maybe it does require a re-think?

Maybe a Pro demo "button" built into the Stage or just Standard demos which either does:

a)
Shows Pro version's controls only - with a popout "You would be able to do more with Pro".

or

b)
Near full demo, limits to a single ver. 5 piano model (K2?), unlocks only a triad for "note-by-note" editing (you can at least try such features on a chord - making a demo not worth using for anything more purposeful without purchase, as is standard practice), other petty annoyances (see Peter Cooke as the Devil in the original 60's film "Bedazzled" for ideas about which things to make annoying) to make it impossible to use (except by the most pointy headed) without supporting with a purchase (yeah, I'm going to say again it's worth the purchase!) and other typical demo limits such as no save options for these tweaks etc?

Perhaps at least a percentage of potential Pro purchasers would see the value of spending more for Pro this way, rather than leaving it for a later update but never making the choice without the example given.

Maybe it would be worthwhile making a clearer note on the Pro page, *before the click*, that the demo is not available for Pro? [Rather than smaller text seen only after clicking "Download trial version" which states "Download a free trial of Pianoteq 6 Standard or Stage".

It does kind of feel like the potential purchaser is put on a text book hunt-and-peck marketing strategy at this point. Certainly not saying that's intentional [Like this delightful advert: Get your hot tamales! Hot tamales! Get 'em here ya chump! Click now already! Don't miss out! Running out sale now on! Everything must go!] but I can see how it can seem unfriendly (as per a minor tactical marketing effrontery) to a potential sophisticated purchaser, stuck between Standard and Pro - whereas everything about Pianoteq is ridiculously positive by comparison to this slightly obscure kind of situation.

I can see how the current demo offerings might kind of obstruct a genuinely reasonable sense of value associated with Pro version and infer that the real value remains in the Stage price point and those secret Pro controls should just be in Stage already, along with a price drop of 90% moving to a cheaper-seeming subscription model etc. (Woah, cool, now ONLY available for infurioGadget 54.0 code name Short Horn - Fat Fingers Edition Basic!) and down that road with more and more modern consumers hitting forums with the idea that everything should be free since you can get things for free if you ask endlessly (whilst simultaneously being utterly ignorant of available freeware and open source anything).

I wonder how many Standard users think they are using Pro because they clicked through from the demo page - confused by their confirmation of purchase email which says "Standard" - putting it down to just a simple mistake - but leaving there - never getting the features they would otherwise be glad to pay for? One edge case per hundred is still a fair percentage of extra income for Modartt.

Whatever better helps to allow more informed purchase decisions for those who would require Pro features, would seem preferable to me.

Someone walking into a piano showroom, asking for a certain type of piano cannot be passed over because "sales" has a perception that this person looks like they don't have the purchasing power. Many wealthy people dress for comfort and don't look rich - fear looking rich - so you can't just say "Here's an entry level model - cheaper if you purchase at the same time as the schools do, come back in then". Rather - "OK, we understand you're looking for something more.. what are your requirements?". Even if you can only point to things like "This goes to 11" - at least, you estimate your every customer is important enough to be worthy of the highest set of features - rather than by osmosis, inform the market that your lowest offering is the best value. Pro's value is way higher IMO than entry levels but at appropriate costs - as far as I can estimate.

You can't reproduce that welcoming confident feeling from being limited to a Standard demo I suppose.

It's clear to me now [Doh!] why so many ask "Is Pro worth it?" and "Can I edit this detail in Standard or do I need Pro?". I mistakenly thought they only wanted to pay Standard - BUT wanted a Pro feature set. Or they're too lazy to demo the Pro version (doesn't exist!).

Maybe prices need a re-jig to make more sales overall? Just following these worms as they escape the can..

My hope is that more keep joining us with the Pro version - because, of course, there's so much more to do within it and I can see how some/many Stage and Standard owners might think "I am tired of reading about all these things you can only do with Pro". Stage and Standard are great value but, just like Pavarotti said once in a delightful interview when asked about why people remain always fascinated by the full force of his and other great male tenor voices, "It's like a Ferarri when the pedal is pushed to the floor - exciting!" [flashes the crazy eyes and smiles] - and Pianoteq Pro is like that for me - there's no point at which I feel let down by the tools at hand and it gets ridiculously quicly stronger with each release.

If users can demo the Pro version, maybe a lot more Standard or Stage users would find that it's worth their dollars for the upgrade.. "How did I go for so long missing out on the ability to do this in Pianoteq?" etc.

In most cases, yes, you'll need Pro if you want to do something deeper to the sound/individual notes - but yeah, maybe a demo of this would help discerning buyers kind of stuck in this mode of uncertainty.

Pianoteq Studio Bundle (Pro plus all instruments)  - Kawai MP11 digital piano - Yamaha HS8 monitors

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

Hello Mr. Qexl,

Having owned the Pro version for several years since its first release, may I relate to you my experience with this miraculous piece of software? (And before you ask, no I am NOT employed by Modartt.)

When I first acquired PRO, I was in those 23 editing windows almost every day, tweaking individual notes' characteristics and playability, and marveling at the results.  Actually, this love affair of daily parameter tweaking with PRO went on for more than a few years, and no, I would never regret owning Pianoteq PRO.  I used to manipulate the editing features to the point of keeping notes and screen freezes of various settings, so as to relate the change on the screen with the change in the sound/feel of a given instrument.

I am now to the point that I can go essentially to the very edit window that will do the most good, and make only minor adjustments to the sounds.  (Let me step back for a moment:  Whenever a new model is made available, such as Steinway B, Blüthner, revised Steinway D, Grotrian, Ruckers harpsichord, etc., I immediately go into the editing windows to discover what each new modeled instrument has to offer as regards to edit capability.

Having owned PRO for several years, I have settled down to using "mostly" the stock models, and usually go into the edit windows even BEFORE considering a look at the main screen windows!  Aside:  The one main-screen parameter that I use the most is the "condition slider."  Even then, a little slider movement goes a long way.  If the Condition Slider is moved too far to the right, then the piano turns into a novelty item (in my mind), and is not terribly useful for real performances.

* * * * * * * *

An Analogy with Multiband Equalizers in an Audiophile-Quality Stereo System:
Way back in 1985, I had acquired a 33-band, 1/3rd octave equalizer with separate adjustments for left- and right channels for my stereo system, and have used it continuously to this day, since that time.  During the first few years of using that piece of equipment on my stereo system, I was forever manipulating the 33 vertical sliders per channel.  As time went on,  I found that "less (manipulation of EQ sliders) is more" in terms of obtaining satisfactory sound.  I sincerely believe the same phenomenon is present with Pianoteq PRO:  The editing capability is always "there" should you need it.  Once acquired, you might find yourself leaving things alone after time, but that fantastic editing capability is there at one's fingertips should the need arise.

Cheers,

Joe

P.S.  Although I read the Pianoteq Forum daily, I usually do not respond to a Stage owner's complaint that such-and-such a note is too loud or too bright or too strident, etc.  Why not?  That's because I know exactly how to make a correcting adjustment in PRO!  I have even gone so far as to notify Mr. Guillaume via email how to make a "one- or two note tweak", and suggest that such a tweak become part of the next update for a given model.

Last edited by jcfelice88keys (28-05-2018 01:46)

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

Hello Joe,

thanks for sharing your experience with Pianoteq - seems very similar.

Since 6.1 I've thrown out most of my prior tweaked (over tweaked) modelings. Defaults now sound considerably better out-of-box than anything I was trying to edit before. Most changes I make now are indeed considerably smaller in scope for the most part.

In general, a lot of things I leave stock, where before I might alter a dozen other things - in hindsight, it was more understandable back before version 5, but after years and esp. after the improvements in 6, these tweaks I used to do are just no longer "improving" anything and many upset the inherent beauty now.

Thinking of it that way, I suppose Standard seems quite an improved value proposition, than it used to be, because of that alone.

Always, people will like a certain piano or note altered here or there - but at least with Standard, someone with Pro can FXP it for you.

Even though it is true that I'm not using all of the Pro features quite as much as I used to, I'd still choose Studio again because all the models are improving so obviously that it's hard to express to someone who's just recently discovered Pianoteq - I don't see this stopping.

Regarding condition slider, I notice that I'm also using it less recently (just a fraction to the right seems enough mostly). With various tunings (scl files etc) sometimes it's refreshing to keep it more pristine.

Rather than spending as much time trying to create too many different piano models with a certain character to my own liking, I've been focusing more on a highly regulated piano as a goal (not synthetically perfect) - my older tweaks were often pushing too much out of tune plus introducing some now glaring oddities. In earlier versions, these might have resulted in a more "swimming" sound (charming for playing at the time but in hindsight less useful over a longer term esp. for recording other than modern styles) but most of this idea of changing a Pianoteq model to something more unique, I now replace that craving with a better DAW sound stage - some extra nice reverbs and the gated mic routine (tweaking this continues) which I can't describe simply. As much as I love tweaking for pianos with great character, the closeness to a label quality recorded sound of a grand in a quality sound stage is proving to be my current inspiration (for playback as well as player perspective). This would be outside of my range of possibilities in real world conditions, fine piano, fine stage, fine recording gear, fine studio and mastering etc., certainly - but highly doable in Pianoteq. There's nothing like being able to playthrough a set or a piece on a D and see if it's more enjoyable in some way on the B or Bluethner - the Grotrian is my current obsession for my sound stages - it really is quite a work of art IRL and in Pianoteq of course.

Love your description of your 33 band EQ Joe, and the phenomenon being similar in regards to Pianoteq and its endlessly modifiable sound features - very true and the way these things can get in the way of allowing us to just listen, play or record, by better balancing the law of diminishing returns in terms of much of the effort spent in this way.

I too would reshape EQ on my setups with some kind of certainty that a given album would require it - I think I only ever had a lesser EQ than yours but I'd be always adjusting for ideal "V" shapes matching the music My current digital home system gives a smaller selection of adequate EQs - no time lost but I do pine for some of the systems from the past.

[I too am not in the employ of Modartt in case it's a good idea to mention this. Although if such a thing were offered, there would have to be some big changes made around here, see - I mean, for a start, have you seen the state of my lunch room? - Just love the gear. I've paid a tidy sum of money to then go tell others how good it can be online for free. Hey!]

Pianoteq Studio Bundle (Pro plus all instruments)  - Kawai MP11 digital piano - Yamaha HS8 monitors

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

Qexl wrote:

Hello Joe,

thanks for sharing your experience with Pianoteq - seems very similar.

<...>

[I too am not in the employ of Modartt in case it's a good idea to mention this. . .  <...> . . .  Hey!]

Hello again, Mr. Qexl,

Thank you for your complimentary remarks in this thread.

I make it a point to mention that I am not in the employ of Modartt, because my praise for Pianoteq (especially Pianoteq PRO) often borders on gushing over the product.  As you are well aware, the Internet is full of parties whose dubious missions are to "distort the truth" and over-sell its good qualities so as to support increased sales of Product X.  I am not one of those parties; all of my compliments about Modartt and Pianoteq PRO are true and as sincere as I am capable of expressing them.

If I were to have a problem with a certain aspect of any given product from any given vendor, I make it a point to discuss said problem with the vendor via private email, rather than complain about it in a public forum.  I am in continuous (and candid) email contact with Modartt and a few other vendors of other products should the need arise.

Cheers,

Joe

Last edited by jcfelice88keys (28-05-2018 17:21)

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

I agree with jcfelice88keys and I confirm that all note velocity and attack problems can be fixed and adjusted with the Pro version. Especially with the parameters of volume, dynamics and spectrum profile.

A few years ago, I made a test by setting the velocity to 127 (listening at low volume so as not to damage my eardrums) to detect the volume variants on the full extent of the keyboard.

I will publish this test if it helps.

Last edited by Modelling Audio Prod (29-05-2018 22:20)

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

Modelling Audio Prod wrote:

I agree with jcfelice88keys and I confirm that all note velocity and attack problems can be fixed and adjusted with the Pro version. Especially with the parameters of volume, dynamics and spectrum profile.

A few years ago, I made a test by setting the velocity to 127 (listening at low volume so as not to damage my eardrums) to detect the volume variants on the full extent of the keyboard.

I will publish this test if it helps.

Thanks for stating this..you approached it like I did. I realize that no one plays all notes at 127 all the time, but I think a run through at 127, 70, and maybe 35 (velocity strength) across all notes would ease someone's mind if they tweaked it and felt good about the volume and timbre.

Yes, it's a very technical/scientific/systematic approach, but to me could be considered the last step of the 'calibration process' for the end user to feel they have a perfectly balanced piano, regardless of natural variations that might otherwise exist in a real piano.

These variations I hear (at least to me) don't feel like it's just 'natural variations' that a real piano would have, so I would be one of those people that would run the gamut of tests and tweak for a while.

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

djejpiano, I don’t know if I understood your message, but here is what I think

Doing the test at 127 doesn’t give the same results as at 30 or 70. Especially if it’s done with the ear.
Ear is sometimes misleading.

I forgot to mention that I also used a level meter to measure peaks accurately. In this way I was able to be certain that there were indeed too large volume differences between some notes, and thanks to this method, I knew exactly how many decibels I had to correct.
It was a really long work, and we were two people to do it on 3 or 4 instruments (D4, Grotrian, Bluethner and Streicher, if my memorie serves).

That said, when we finished the corrections, we thought it was enough to freeze the volume settings and apply them to all our presets.
It was an error that we found later, because if a note appears too high in a room X with a position of microphone X, this same note may also seem too low compared to others in a room Y with a microphone position Y. This is a very complex acoustic issue.

Finally, when a note seems too high, we simply lower its volume individually, without trying to make all the keyboard notes equal.

For the timbre, simply adjust the volume of the most resonant harmonics in the spectrum profile.

I hope this will help

Last edited by Modelling Audio Prod (01-06-2018 20:53)

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

Another important thing to specify

We did this test with only two proximity microphones, and we also deactivate reverb, delay, and anything that could skew the results.

We did the test in stereo and mono.

Re: Consistency of timbre across each note....

EvilDragon wrote:

Which is highly unrealistic of course, nobody would actually play things consistently at velocity 127 all the time. Plus, timbral variations are a normal thing on the real piano as well...

I think the problem raised by djejpiano is legitimate, and doing a test at 127 was the only way to check if there were really any volume differences between the notes.

If you test a car at 300 km / h during 15 minutes to check if the car is not flying, it doesn't mean that you expect people to drive at that speed for 15 minutes.

There are really large volume differences on some instruments.