Topic: background sounds electronic

I am evaluating the demo version. I got the setup done finally on Linux and latency is good, despite not yet killing pulse audio.

The sound is quite good (the Bluthner felt best, pity it is not in the stage package), but when it decays there is an electronic mixed sine wave like background noise which is unpleasant.

Does the synthesis adapt to the computing power available - would it sound better on a more powerful PC (I can reorganise PC use with some effort to give it more power) - or are there settings which would provide a more realistic background growl?

I may still buy for a bit of variety, but my old Yamaha p5 native output feels less synthetic.

Re: background sounds electronic

To eliminate power of your PC, your soundcard, drivers, etc. you can just record sound using built-in Pianoteq recorder and then export WAV with enabled "high-quality settings" checkbox (that is maximal polyphony and sample rate).

I personally don't understand what you mean by "electronic mixed sine wave". Pianoteq has most realistic piano sound on the market, produce a lot of details that is impossible for any of sample based VST. So, please post link to your recording.

Note also that sample based digital pianos and VST can't produce some natural properties of piano sound, like sympathetic resonance, or produce it in poor quality. Another difference is that digital pianos usually have too few velocity layers, therefore has too bright sound in low velocities. So, if you are accustomed to listen digital pianos and sampled VST, sound of Pianoteq (as well as acoustic piano) can be considered as wrong.

Last edited by Ross (15-03-2015 20:31)
Combine velocity curves: http://output.jsbin.com/cukeme/9

Re: background sounds electronic

stuartmacg wrote:

Does the synthesis adapt to the computing power available - would it sound better on a more powerful PC

Nope.

Hard work and guts!

Re: background sounds electronic

EvilDragon wrote:

Nope.

Don't forget about polyphony and internal sample rate.

Combine velocity curves: http://output.jsbin.com/cukeme/9

Re: background sounds electronic

Polyphony doesn't change the quality of sound (it doesn't make Pianoteq sound "better"). Internal sample rate doesn't really make a huge impact if you change it from 48k to 192k (personally I hear no change in the quality of sound at all)... Pianos have little to no spectral energy above 12kHz.

Last edited by EvilDragon (15-03-2015 21:53)
Hard work and guts!

Re: background sounds electronic

stuartmacg wrote:

I am evaluating the demo version. I got the setup done finally on Linux and latency is good, despite not yet killing pulse audio.

The sound is quite good (the Bluthner felt best, pity it is not in the stage package), but when it decays there is an electronic mixed sine wave like background noise which is unpleasant.

Does the synthesis adapt to the computing power available - would it sound better on a more powerful PC (I can reorganise PC use with some effort to give it more power) - or are there settings which would provide a more realistic background growl?

I may still buy for a bit of variety, but my old Yamaha p5 native output feels less synthetic.

Your background noise is not normal and it has probably nothing to do with pianoteq, polyphony, sample rates...
It is probably a ground mass noise.
Maybe a problem with your computer's soundcard.
Try an external sound card. How did you connect your controler to your pc? If you use an usb cable for midi, this could also generate electrical noises.

Re: background sounds electronic

>>I personally don't understand what you mean by "electronic mixed sine wave".
Perhaps the word twang might better describe the sort of sound, with the pedal down after the notes have faded.  A real piano gives a broader sound board growl(?).  I have not looked into recording.

With the assurance that it should be good, I will explore a bit further - increase polyphony etc.

I use an upright at home and the stage piano when away at work during the week when I live in a local flat (and a Steinway grand at piano lessons :-) )

The output from the NVIDIA card is to a good amp and HiFi speaker system.

I am using a USB midi converter cable, but I cannot see how that could affect the sound in any way?   Still it does sound like an electronic artefact - If the software does not naturally do it, I will look into it more.

Thanks for your replies folks

Re: background sounds electronic

stuartmacg wrote:

sort of sound, with the pedal down after the notes have faded.

The main difference between sound with pedal down and and pedal up is the sympathetic resonance. Also there is the dampers noise (that can be too loud if you have non-continuous pedal). You can adjust all in Pianoteq.

Again, record wav and post it here if it sounds bad in your opinion.

Last edited by Ross (16-03-2015 05:43)
Combine velocity curves: http://output.jsbin.com/cukeme/9

Re: background sounds electronic

I had the same thing happen and found the root cause to not be PianoTeq.

I use a Kurzweil PC3LE8 to drive PianoTeq. Sounded fantastic so I decided that I might as well run the line out from the Kurz through the sound card and be able to use one set of headphones/speakers.

Worked well, except D#5 had a distinctive electronic hiss ("transformers" style). Removed the line out from the Kurzweil and nothing changed. Removed the line in from the sound card the beauty was back and D#5 was again clean.

I would suggest you eliminate all but a pair of headphones to make sure it's not ground noise or other interference from active electronics.

Last edited by vikana (16-03-2015 15:25)

Re: background sounds electronic

stuartmacg wrote:

when it decays there is an electronic mixed sine wave like background noise which is unpleasant.

I have the same effect sometimes.

Pianoteq 6 Pro (D4, K2, Blüthner, Model B, Grotrian, Ant.Petrof)
Studiologic SL88Grand, Steinberg UR22mkII

Re: background sounds electronic

If you use a laptop, disconnect the power supply and check if the noise is gone when running on battery. It's very, very often what happens.

Re: background sounds electronic

I think its the reverb effects. Ive started to use some rreverb impulse files in stead of the built in reverbs in pianoteq. Thats much better. Maybe its not the reverbs, but I think so

Heres some discussion
http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/viewtopic.php?id=2265

Re: background sounds electronic

Alais...I must fully agree with the frist poster of this subject; I happen to have the same nasty experience, specially with the D4, and most perceptive with the more softer derivates, like the "Intimate".
Happily the "Classical Recording"is suffering less.

There are really sinewaves in the decay portion of the sound, in the middle kb area. It is as if somebody is softly whistling your note when it decays.....

So we are NOT talking here about spurious noises, coming from earthe loops, laptop power supplies etc etc.
I can thrustfully state that my setups are free of that, and besides Pianoteq I use other sound generators, like Hauptwerk, having none of these issues.
I also tested with diverse Audio interfaces, like Focusrite Saffire, M-Audio, EMU and MOTU units.

So there is room for improvement on this.

Another thing:  I certainly do NOT like most of the built- in reverbs. They add some obtrusing "bulk"to the middle audio area, that makes your beautiful transparant pianosounds much more "heavy".
Even if you move the MIX slider a lot to the left, at say minus 12 or 15 dB.

Instead  ( IF one needs reverb sometimes)  I use a separate convolution VST, with the impulse response of the Anloo church in the Netherlands, which is a fine small medieval church having a reverb time of some 1,5 seconds.  And the surprising thing is, that THIS reverb does not al all have this nasty effect, even when mixed in at a much higher level ( say minus 4 dB or so).

Another thing ( 2): which I also spoke about in another post:  I do NOT like the built in headphones simulation, called BINAURAL......
This to my opinion does alter the basic sound, which is should not do!!!
Instead of that I use the Toneboosters ISONE, which is perfect, so that you ONLY hear the sound moving a bit to the front in your head, WITHOUT altering the tonal characteristic.

Now don,t understand me wrong: I still find Pianoteq giving me the most realistic playing effct, and also a VERY nice and convincing piano sound, but one should try out these things  for improving the sound even more.........

Greetings,

Geert

Re: background sounds electronic

geert wrote:

This to my opinion does alter the basic sound, which is should not do!!!

OF COURSE it should! Binaural head picks the sound up completely differently compared to any microphone. Hence the tonal changes.

Hard work and guts!

Re: background sounds electronic

geert wrote:

There are really sinewaves in the decay portion of the sound, in the middle kb area. It is as if somebody is softly whistling your note when it decays.....

If you hear whistles at the tail of notes, just before the sound goes silent, then it could be caused by the soundcard supporting only 16-bit output. If you export a 16-bit wav file with pianoteq, and listen to it, you should not hear this whistling sound anymore at the tail of notes because Pianoteq applies dithering when exporting to a 16-bit wav.

Re: background sounds electronic

Hello Julien, now its getting interesting......In the mean time I took some pictures of my  Spectrum Analyser screens.
Must find out how to place them here on the forum. Specially the notes directly lower then middle C have this effect, where in de decay portion after say  2 seconds there appears a very strong frequency at more or less 2,5 octaves above.
And,  it actually gets MUCH louder then the ground tone, after say 3 seconds, when the original note is already at some minus 60 dB or so.......

In the middle octave, say A 440 Hz, there is totally NO effect of this. Of course also there  one can observe harmonics coming and going, but they seem to be in a more musical ( harmonic?) relationship with the ground tone, so are not disturbing at all. Besides, they do NOT come up that much higher in amplitude.

One should really take a video of this. I will certainly try this and place it somewhere for others to observe.

Now about the bits. Of course I choose 48kBit/s as samplefrequency,  I do not see a higher posibillity.
BUT: nowhere can I see a a choice of bits........

I may HOPE that Pianoteq works with 24 bits at least........  So I do not quite understand why you mention 16 bits.

I test all of this with the MOTU Microbook II.

Greetings,

Geert

Re: background sounds electronic

If you are on macos, you should check the bit-depth of your soundcard output , in "Audio and MIDI Setup" (found in Applications / Utilities ) -- Presse Command-1 to bring the "Audio Devices" window if it is not visible. It should display "2ch - 24bit Integer"

If that is not the issue, you should definitively post an audio example (wav preferably) of that sound so that we can check if something is wrong

Re: background sounds electronic

Thank you for your quick response on this!

The Audio Device panel of my Microbook II only shows me the current samplerate and buffersize.

But of course it can use 24 bits....I noticed now on your website that internally Pianteq works with 32 bits.


But I will hook up two other devices, the  EMU0404USB a as well as the Focusrite Saffire, and  record and comparesome samples, before I get further with this matter, just to exclude any effects of my hardware.

Anyhow, from your reply I would suggest that you do not recognise this effect, so it seems something that only some users experience.

Just give me some time to do this research......

Greetings,

Geert

Re: background sounds electronic

Ok, thats quick...!!!

Very much to my surprise, its the MOTU Microbook II I use!!

I hooked up my ( cheaper...) EMU 0404USB. This unit does come up with a settings display where I can select a bit-depth.

Much to my surprise, not only on 24 bits, but also on 16 bits its clean as hell!!  Now I have to find out, if this problem changes when I manage to get the MOTU into 24 bits.... but this is really a bad day for me, as I use the MOTU for all sorts of sound, and it is so much more versatile. But in the end, it is only the sound that matters of course.

SO, Pianoteq, nothing to blame there..!!  And I  suggest for people with this problem, to change Audio Device and look again.

This all was done with direct program. Next step will be, to look into this with Reaper and VST, as probably there I can adjust the bit depth of the MOTU.

Julian, thanks for the reply!

Greetings,

Geert

Re: background sounds electronic

Some more strange things:  Now that I changed my EMU to 24 bits, switching back to the MOTU it also has a clean output now....... It seems that somehow it took over the settings change....very unsatisfying but alais...

THe next thing is, that when working as a VST in Reaper, with BOTH audio devices I have the unwanted sidetones back again!!

Well, at least I have a clean direct config now, but as I most of the time use Reaper, it is still not very satisfiying.

One thing is sure: it is certainly NOT a fault in Pianoteq.......!!

I am now going to test on aother PC, with Firewire and the Focusrite. WIll let you knwo the results.

Re: background sounds electronic

16-bit and 24-bit recording
The MicroBook system handles all data
with a 24-bit signal path, regardless of the
I/O format. You can record and play back
16-bit or 24-bit audio files at any
supported sample rate via any of the
MicroBook’s inputs and outputs.

This is from the manual. And this explains, why there  is no setting for bit-depth.

Re: background sounds electronic

24-BIT OPERATION
Your MicroBook hardware fully supports
24-bit recording capabilities. Simply
enable 24-bit operation as instructed in
your digital audio workstation’s manual.
The MicroBook always supplies a 24-bit
data stream.

I may assume, that Pianoteq also outputs with 24 bits??  As I see no settings anywhere.

Re: background sounds electronic

I give up! On another PC, I get bad results with boths soundcards, on the stand-alone version.
Can not get it better by changing settings.

Julien, could you pls tell me, where I can send a wav-file for you to evaluate??

Greetings,

Geert

Re: background sounds electronic

You can send it here:

https://www.pianoteq.com/support_form?direct or by writing to support@pianoteq.com

Don't forget to include the fxp if you are using custom settings (otherwise just tell us the name of the preset you are using), and the MIDI file that we can use to reproduce your issue

Re: background sounds electronic

Hello Julien, and other readers: As I yesterday got very uncorrelated results testing with two different PC,s and also different Audio Devices, I suddenley by accident discovered the reason:

I was testing with slightly different fx,es......!

So now I have discovered that the effect of the strong non-harmonic sidetones is strongly related to the position of the Mute slider. AND REPRODUCABLE ON ALL MY EQUIPMENT !!

One should test it with the D4-Intimate fx. And no reverb or other effects. Try the E3 ( in the octave directly below middle C), or other keys in that octave.

With the Mute slider at 0 ( zero) it is ok. But at  mid-positions, say 0,35, there is a nasty tone developing in the decay, that is close to D6  ( which is just two semitones below the natural harmonic...)

I sent these results to Julien.

Re: background sounds electronic

geert wrote:

With the Mute slider at 0 ( zero) it is ok. But at  mid-positions, say 0,35, there is a nasty tone developing in the decay, that is close to D6  ( which is just two semitones below the natural harmonic...)

This is perfectly normal for the muting action. Try putting something on real piano strings (or a guitar) and such inharmonics will develop since you're blocking the string natural decay!

Re: background sounds electronic

Well, I must say, that I learned a lot these days!!

Got almost the same answer from Julien.

It just never came to my mind, that the strings can also have non-harmonic vibrations!

Its a mixed feeling: on one side I am glad that my equipment as well as the software is working in good order, on the other hand I feel a bit ashamed about my lack of knowledge.......!!

Greetings,

Geert