Topic: Played church recital with PT

Just wanted to say that I played almost a full recital with romantics, jazz and tango with PT at my church. People were very happy, I just wanted to share a couple of things I noticed:

We couldn't afford to rent a piano so I had to use my trusty laptop,  a Yamaha Clavinova and PT with Bluethner. I'm happy I could play both intimately (Schumann) and powerful (Brahms) and I think I reached everybody in the audience,  I doubt I could have played the intimate passages with an acoustic. People liked it a lot, even if I used some 15 year old budget speakers. I noticed however, that the midrange was quite dominant and I wished I'd used more time on EQ'ing. By the way, there were no EQ and no effects in Bluethner, just a light tweaking of the soundboard and a couple of other settings.

I just wanted to ask people if they've noticed a slight lag when playing through speakers? It was probably my setup, I used a Lexicon Lambda soundcard with 10 ms buffer (of course ASIO) and the church reverberation was quite large, so I really had to play slower or else everything drowned. Another thing, somebody told me after the concerts that towards the end her ears were growing tired of the "speaker sound" and I don't know if I should blame the speakers, the EQ, the concert programme or her not being used to a digital piano sound.

Not sure where this story is going, but feel free to contribute with your live playing experiences, I plan to do more concerts with PT in the future. Already used it a lot at services!

Last edited by CuriousDan (13-06-2014 18:53)

Re: Played church recital with PT

CuriousDan wrote:

Just wanted to say that I played almost a full recital with romantics, jazz and tango with PT at my church. People were very happy, I just wanted to share a couple of things I noticed:

We couldn't afford to rent a piano so I had to use my trusty laptop,  a Yamaha Clavinova and PT with Bluethner. I'm happy I could play both intimately (Schumann) and powerful (Brahms) and I think I reached everybody in the audience,  I doubt I could have played the intimate passages with an acoustic. People liked it a lot, even if I used some 15 year old budget speakers. I noticed however, that the midrange was quite dominant and I wished I'd used more time on EQ'ing. By the way, there were no EQ and no effects in Bluethner, just a light tweaking of the soundboard and a couple of other settings.

I just wanted to ask people if they've noticed a slight lag when playing through speakers? It was probably my setup, I used a Lexicon Lambda soundcard with 10 ms buffer (of course ASIO) and the church reverberation was quite large, so I really had to play slower or else everything drowned. Another thing, somebody told me after the concerts that towards the end her ears were growing tired of the "speaker sound" and I don't know if I should blame the speakers, the EQ, the concert programme or her not being used to a digital piano sound.

Not sure where this story is going, but feel free to contribute with your live playing experiences, I plan to do more concerts with PT in the future. Already used it a lot at services!

Speaker quality will make a gigantic difference on listener fatigue, and if they're very cheap, they won't cover the whole spectrum of the piano well at all. Was the 10ms buffer your settings on the sound card, because that's a big enough number with a USB sound card that you'll hear noticeable latency.

Try again on some improved equipment. Good luck!

Pianoteq 6 Std, Bluthner, Model B, Grotian, YC5, Hohner, Kremsegg #1, Electric Pianos. Roland FP-90, Windows 10 quad core, Xenyx Q802USB, Yamaha HS8 monitors, Audio Technica
ATH-M50x headphones.

Re: Played church recital with PT

How far from you were the speakers? Note that sound travels at about 0.3m per millisecond, so you could add about 10ms of latency if they are 3m away.

Last edited by mooks (14-06-2014 02:15)

Re: Played church recital with PT

I'd say 4-5 meters.
Thanks beakybird!

Re: Played church recital with PT

A decent sound in a church is almost always a challenge... but I share your experience: and it's MUCH more EZ to play PT than a real piano, provided you've got a (very) good PA system. In my case, I'm bypassing completely the church's own sound system, often more or less OK for speech but not for music.
For music, you need power (yes!), quality (of course!) and a quite sophisticated configuration, noticeably multiple HP's with delays. In my case, 4 pairs of 400 W 10", bi-amplified, with compensating delays and levels very accurately defined... Lot of work, lot of stuff, but definitely a splendid result.
And don't forget to give yourself either headphones, either monitors close to you. In my case, the internal speakers of my Casio piano (not its sound!).

Re: Played church recital with PT

Hi all,

Gig situation like this can be difficult for solutions like PTQ.

First, latency issue: if you have acceptable latency with your system at home (headphones or nearfield monitors) you must know that every extra meter away from your speakers adds 3.3 ms latency, like mooks pointed out. I have had experience like this. PTQ was ok at home but on stage it felt delayed. We all seem to have different tolerance for latency and you can "adapt" yourself to bigger latency but it can be difficult if you most of the time play with minimal latency and then suddenly jump to completely different situation. Having close personal monitors can help if PA system isn't too loud. If PA is loud then you have to put your monitors very loud to beat the PA and too loud monitors make your playing feeling unnatural.

Second, "muddy" sound: people here like PTQ cause it has wide, warm, natural piano sound. In fact I think this is the reason for many people favor PTQ over stage piano sounds. When you sit in front of the real piano it sounds wide, especially those older grand pianos. Stage pianos, like my Nord, have thinner, more punchy piano sound and it emphasizes the clear attack. Still I think there's a reason why many Stage pianos sound like that. They're targeted to sound good on stage and cut through mix (also on average PA-system). Nord is a perfect exampe of this. In fact I moved from Roland to Nord exactly because of this: Roland (RD700GX) allways needed lot of EQ to not sound muddy. And IMO if you need lot of EQ, it's probably bad solution. With my Nord I practically never use EQ and this is also feedback from many sound guys: they like the sound just the way it is. I am not saying that you cannot get good sound from PTQ but I'd say it's a big challenge at least if you are operating with average PA and problematic acoustics (for example people shouting 80dB or even more). PA systems tend to emphasize mid range and/or bass and this can sound unnatural for piano sound. To sum it, beware that sound which is good at home maybe bad on stage. Take time to find 'a stage piano sound' from your PTQ.

Third, Reverb: this is quite obvious. If your gig space has lot of reverb itself you should make your piano as dry as possible. Otherwise it is probably going to sound messy.

I play about 130 gigs per year with different pop or jazz groups and normally we have a very good sound system. Personally I am not changing my Nord setup at the moment. It is so good compromise for sound, playability and reliability. Still I'd like to give a chance to PTQ when right gig comes.

Re: Played church recital with PT

Totally reasonable when playing gigs where your sound must cut through. In my case, I need a long sustained, intimate and soft solo piano sound for romantic composers and some delicate jazz. We all have to find our solution...

Re: Played church recital with PT

Luc Henrion wrote:

A decent sound in a church is almost always a challenge... . . .
And don't forget to give yourself either headphones, either monitors close to you. In my case, the internal speakers of my Casio piano (not its sound!).

So you are running Pianoteq through the PA system, and listening (via headphones or monitor loudspeaker) to the Casio's sound generator?

That's an interesting idea -- it means you have "direct sound", no latency, to your ears.

.            Charles

Re: Played church recital with PT

Interesting topic.

I have played real grand pianos in recital in church venues.  Ironically, and perhaps because the acoustic space is comparatively larger than a studio, home, or recital hall, my dynamics are not the same when playing in a church.
My softest sounds usually end up being played mezzopiano, and my mezzofortes usually end up being played forte; church venues are often among the worst places to play recitals with real pianos.

Cheers,

Joe

Re: Played church recital with PT

to cpcohen: no, no! I listen to the PT sound via the line input  (MIDI mode "local control off") of the Casio.
And the latency is so small that it doesn't disturb at all.

to jcfelice88keys: sure, you can't find a worst place to play piano than a church, you'd better play organ when possible ;-) But PT is a VERY nice remedy: this is the only "piano" I know where you can remove any reverb...
OK, to be honest, a pair of PZM mics inside a grand did a fine job just a few weeks ago, but... PT forever !!!