Topic: Another Pretender to the Throne?

I love Pianoteq. But I have Ivory and the Garritan Authorized Steinway and some others. I just like the idea of virtual instruments so I enjoy having options to choose from. Funny thing is, I almost never choose anything but Pianoteq. Still, I always wonder what new virtual instruments sound like when they come along so of course I am curious about the new True Keys from VI Labs. They do an OK job of promoting their product on their website. But one blurb really irks me:

"No part of the sound in True Keys is modeled or synthesized in any way, nor is the half pedal feature."

Um, guys? That ain't necessarily a benefit!

I'm tempted to try at least one of their 3 offerings. If any virtual piano comes along that can do a better job than Pianoteq then I am willling to jump ship. Still, I can't help feeling that True Keys is just another pretender to the throne.

Re: Another Pretender to the Throne?

I bought True Keys recently (the full monty) and it's excellent; much better than Ivory 2 actually. The basic piano tone is gorgeous, especially on the Steinway and Bechstein, and has a lovely fullness and presence. My sense is that it outdoes Pianoteq in this respect.

True Keys is also very playable. Pianoteq is probably better in terms of overall playability and it's certainly superior in terms of sympathetic and sustain resonance (it seems to me that modelling is a better solution here than sampling). Having said this, True Keys is remarkably good in these areas too (and, again, clearly superior to Ivory 2).

Much though I love Pianoteq, I find there's still a very slight hint of artificiality to the basic piano tone that becomes clear if you compare it side by side to True Keys. Having said this, I do the prefer the basic tonal character of Pianoteq to that of Ivory 2, which sounds distant and thin to me -- like a recorded piano rather than a real one.

If I had to choose one of the True Keys pianos, I'd opt for the Steinway (American), which is probably the most versatile of the three. I'm not too keen on the Fazioli, which is rather loud and a bit harsh.

Last edited by Pianophile (24-08-2013 12:21)

Re: Another Pretender to the Throne?

I'm going to get it, the moment the dongle arrives at my door, probably next week. Reason is to get the sampled Steinway, if only as a reference (close as I'll ever get to the actual thing). Same reasons I guess for the other two instruments, only less urgent - say as Bluthner might stand if one's fixed on D4 sound, nice to have around for an alternative.

Re: Another Pretender to the Throne?

What I don't understand from sampled pianos, is how different they are of a real acoustic and how reckless you can play and still sound good, why they dont make them realistic?. I mean, on Ivory you can even stomp the sustain pedal from beginning to finish and you will still get a nice sound, you do that on an acoustic and you'll get a total mess, in fact, digital pianos teach a bad pedal technique because of that, is because they can't record longer samples or something?, I don't know if its the decay or the samples but is really different and easier to sound good on samples, when I finally got an acoustic I had to relearn how to get a good sound, and my pedalling sucked.

Is this new sampled piano any different on that?, it was my main complain about Ivory.

Re: Another Pretender to the Throne?

Too-low polyphony doesn't make over-sustaining apparent to a player. If he's lucky, he'll record his product, as MIDI, replay it at higher poly, and hear his playing as it truly is.

ADDED: well that's unfair. Should say have the overpedalling brought home as it is, but he's never heard - far too much.

I have by now bought the software, and the Bechstein's so interesting it's all I've listened to. Odd effect to it, in contrast to Pianoteq. One poster upon the recent release of Upright, praised it as extending his playing years; the previous Pianos being "too perfect" to fit with his group, as against the condition of the real pianos hanging out in the playing venues. which weren't at all perfect. The Truekeys Bechstein is just like that, an out-of-condition real piano, but with perfect tuning and a very mellow sound. Striking mix.

Last edited by custral (03-09-2013 05:43)

Re: Another Pretender to the Throne?

I don't think is a polyphony thing, I play with the most I can on every case as I have a computer that can handle it.

Re: Another Pretender to the Throne?

I got it, I like it, I updated my post of the Chopin Nocturne on C# minor opus post with it.

You can compare it with Ivory and Pianoteq.

Is the last one.

http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/viewtopic.php?id=2760

Last edited by Rohade (05-09-2013 18:56)

Re: Another Pretender to the Throne?

Rohade wrote:

What I don't understand from sampled pianos, is how different they are of a real acoustic and how reckless you can play and still sound good, why they dont make them realistic?. I mean, on Ivory you can even stomp the sustain pedal from beginning to finish and you will still get a nice sound, you do that on an acoustic and you'll get a total mess, in fact, digital pianos teach a bad pedal technique because of that, is because they can't record longer samples or something?, I don't know if its the decay or the samples but is really different and easier to sound good on samples, when I finally got an acoustic I had to relearn how to get a good sound, and my pedalling sucked.

Is this new sampled piano any different on that?, it was my main complain about Ivory.

The limited length of samples can be a reason. But the main reason - at least that' what I suspect - is sympathic resonance. When holding down the pedal on a real piano too long you will get an overdose of sympathic resonance, causing certain tones to sustain almost endlessly. This does not always sound very pleasant. A sampled piano doesn't suffer/benefit from this phenomena.

Re: Another Pretender to the Throne?

Here's a VI Labs tute on their Sympathetic Resonance (mixed with pedal effects, some where the demo doesn't exactly equal the script).

                                                                        Symp Res

Last edited by custral (06-09-2013 05:32)

Re: Another Pretender to the Throne?

I'd been testing true keys for almost a month, yes, it is good indeed, what surprised me most and is the best feature to me are the staccatto samples, how much I miss it when I play with Ivory and its noticeable. True keys and Ivory are both clean samples, beautiful sound indeed. For me the advantage of true keys over ivory that go beyond personal taste are the playability, somehow responses better, the stac samples and the  resonances, they area again, noticeable and add a lot to the sound played. Ivory has more configuration I think and what you can achieve if you go with a resonant soundboard I cannot still replicate with True Keys. I liked the sustain effect on Ivory more than True Keys.

I can do more comparisons even with pianoteq if you are insterested, and thinking of repeating short patterns two or three times of each piano followed by each other.

You can't go wrong with any option being TK, Ivory if you like samples or Pianoteq if you go simulated. I like how TK is very playable.

Last edited by Rohade (03-10-2013 21:35)

Re: Another Pretender to the Throne?

Require 64GB of free space on HD.
Is that the largest piano sampler library today??


Vienna Imperial have about 50GB, but it's a "500GB of 44.1kHz/24-bit sample data into a compact 50GB disk" according this article:   http://www.musicradar.com/reviews/tech/...ial-221688

Last edited by Beto-Music (04-10-2013 02:35)

Re: Another Pretender to the Throne?

You can have less than 64, thats for the three Pianos, Quantum Leap is far bigger.

Re: Another Pretender to the Throne?

Quantum Leap have 261GB for 4 pianos.  Vienna Imperial it's still larger, if decompressed.
86GB for the Bosendorfer.


But I would like to understand more about the recording itself. How people can say that a simple chord it's better in one compared to another, if we are in the digital age and all or mostly are recorded in Hi end equipment and anecoic chambers?

Is micrphone placement the key factor, or just a matter of taste, like someone prefer a library basic tone for the mic position, and other person prefer another mic position? 


Rohade wrote:

You can have less than 64, thats for the three Pianos, Quantum Leap is far bigger.

Last edited by Beto-Music (04-10-2013 13:36)

Re: Another Pretender to the Throne?

I bought true keys and Imho ivory is much better ... no questions about it.....

Re: Another Pretender to the Throne?

Probably recorded in a perspective that please you more.

paolopiano wrote:

I bought true keys and Imho ivory is much better ... no questions about it.....

Re: Another Pretender to the Throne?

Beto-Music wrote:

Probably recorded in a perspective that please you more.

paolopiano wrote:

I bought true keys and Imho ivory is much better ... no questions about it.....

after 2 hours of testing I must say that the staccato at piano velocity is better on TK .... but overall sensation is better on Ivory.... Playability is better on Pianoteq ofcourse , still Imho

Re: Another Pretender to the Throne?

Sampled pianos usually had no true recordings of staccato, but a mix of a interrupted legato recording cutted and placed together with the staccato decay sound.

The way the algorithm mix/blend one to another determines the quaity of the final staccato sound.


Maybe true keys went a step further:

"Staccato 
Release samples are carefully recorded and voiced for each key and are numerous and timed for the utmost realism. Most noticeable is having true staccato release trails that make staccato playing more enjoyable and realistic. Listen to the energy of a long bass string as it's dampened as well as the ringing trails of treble notes. Along with resonances, the release trails give body and depth to the real pianos"

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/s...&gl=br

paolopiano wrote:
Beto-Music wrote:

Probably recorded in a perspective that please you more.

paolopiano wrote:

I bought true keys and Imho ivory is much better ... no questions about it.....

after 2 hours of testing I must say that the staccato at piano velocity is better on TK .... but overall sensation is better on Ivory.... Playability is better on Pianoteq ofcourse , still Imho

Re: Another Pretender to the Throne?

I can tell you that the stacatto is one of the best features of TK. It's really differnet from the other ones, maybe that's why I feel is more responsible, and personally, I love the tone of the American. Ivory sounds better or maybe more delicate on some recordings involving the sample pedal.

Last edited by Rohade (06-10-2013 21:33)

Re: Another Pretender to the Throne?

The weaknesses of Pianoteq in my opinion are

- sometimes an artificial sounding sustain where certain frequencies stand out. I guess the overlap of partial tones from different keys is not modelled right, so you sometimes here sine tones stick out. I guess the real piano has kind of a saturation behaviour there which is not modeled in Pianoteq (yet)?

- the sometimes boxy overall sound, basically a microphoning / stereo issue

Re: Another Pretender to the Throne?

Ok, after two days I have to admit that TK is very good perhaps more playable than Ivory ..... Yes, only fools can not change their minds......

Re: Another Pretender to the Throne?

Pianophile wrote:

I bought True Keys recently (the full monty) and it's excellent; much better than Ivory 2 actually. The basic piano tone is gorgeous, especially on the Steinway and Bechstein, and has a lovely fullness and presence. My sense is that it outdoes Pianoteq in this respect.

True Keys is also very playable. Pianoteq is probably better in terms of overall playability and it's certainly superior in terms of sympathetic and sustain resonance (it seems to me that modelling is a better solution here than sampling). Having said this, True Keys is remarkably good in these areas too (and, again, clearly superior to Ivory 2).

Much though I love Pianoteq, I find there's still a very slight hint of artificiality to the basic piano tone that becomes clear if you compare it side by side to True Keys. Having said this, I do the prefer the basic tonal character of Pianoteq to that of Ivory 2, which sounds distant and thin to me -- like a recorded piano rather than a real one.

If I had to choose one of the True Keys pianos, I'd opt for the Steinway (American), which is probably the most versatile of the three. I'm not too keen on the Fazioli, which is rather loud and a bit harsh.

I  will second everything Pianophile said about Truekeys. Although I only own the American I bought as a download single. 
It is genuinely spectacular!! I t completely blows away  Ivory II (which is over-hyped), and is a bit better than Galaxy Vintage D (another Steinway) , as far as sampled pianos go IMO.
And, as far as Pianoteq is concerned,  tonewise, Pianoteq (bluthner)  comes up quite a bit short in
comparison to TK too , but Pteq  still has a little edge  when it comes to playability  and linearity from ppp to
fff. (but not by much!)
I still love Pianoteq for what it is, and the future potential of its modeling technology- I kind-of think of
it  in a different way  vs sampled pianos....
rhombic

Last edited by rhombic (08-10-2013 00:03)

Re: Another Pretender to the Throne?

'Overhyped'  is a good word to describe Ivory II. It's a mediocre product that has for some reason garnered ecstatic reviews (what is it with piano software reviewers? many of them seem to know little about pianos). Synthogy are apparently very good at marketing. Its much-vaunted modeled sympathetic and sustain resonance are a joke compared to Pianoteq. The various soundboard models it uses are either far too dry and dead or far too resonant and artificial-sounding.

I love the player's perspective on the TK Steinway. I do feel that TK's shortcomings are revealed, though, when you play Chopin or other nineteenth-century composers: its sympathetic and sustain resonance aren't quite complex and rich enough, so you don't get the kind of sonic bloom and overtone saturation that real pianos (and Pianoteq!) are capable of.

Last edited by Pianophile (08-10-2013 23:04)

Re: Another Pretender to the Throne?

When Ivory and most DP Softwares have nearly no sympathetic ressonance effects at all, a guy called Cornell Mezzo had already created scripts to simulate most harmonics of a real piano to the Kontakt piano libraries.

But I once asked hin about his scripts, and he said that was using mostly Ivory (first version).

That got me really confused...

Last edited by Beto-Music (08-10-2013 20:55)