Topic: Levelling irregular velocities using piano/mezzo/forte hammer hardness

There was interest expressed in a tuition video regarding levelling irregular velocities using note-for-note hammer hardness adjustments. I shall try to put one together. In the meanwhile, I would like to say something about it.

If one has a version of PinoTEQ that enables note-for-note hammer hardness adjustment (piano, mezzo and forte), then there is absolutely no need for a note-for-note velocity curve feature. Unless I am very much mistaken, the levelling of irregularities of velocities (once the action has been regulated) in a physical piano is done by 'toning' the hammers. This is precisely what we can do in PianoTEQ with the note-for-note hammer hardness feature.

More later,

Kindest Regards,

Chris

Last edited by sigasa (29-10-2012 22:41)

Re: Levelling irregular velocities using piano/mezzo/forte hammer hardness

OK

This evening I had a Eureka moment. I have achieved the best results so far levelling the velocities on my Acuna88 using piano and mezzo hammer hardness adjustments. Because of this, I believe I am now better equipped to describe how to level irregular velocities.

Before I begin, I will say that the results obtained by this approach will ultimately depend on the state of the keybed/action. If your keyboard has stuck keys for example, you cannot expect to achieve the velocity consistency of a Steinway! That said, most keyboards will benefit from this technique to a greater or lesser degree. Also note that note-for-note hammer hardness editing ability is only available in PianoTEQ PRO as far as I know.


STAGE 1: 'Piano'

The method I have discovered to be most effective is to begin with 'piano' hammer hardness adjustments.
Your best friend in this method is the chromatic run! Begin to play a chromatic run (a scale of semitones) anywhere on the keyboard very quietly and as evenly as you are able. You need to really listen closely as you do this and as you do, you will hear any inconsistencies in the 'piano' (or 'pianissimo') range.

Now, those notes that stood out as sounding 'louder' or 'brighter', make a mental note of. Presuming you have note-for-note editing abilities (PRO Version), double-click on the 'piano' slider in the hammer hardness area of the PianoTEQ GUI. You will now find yourself on the 'pianissimo' note-for-note editing page.

Now you can begin to adjust the notes that 'stood out'. Note here that you shouldn't need to make big adjustments in the pianissimo range. Now pick a note that stood out and play it. You will see a marker indicating the note on the screen. First, right-click and select 'remove all control notes/nodes'. Now you are ready to make your first adjustment. At the note you have chosen, drag down the yellow line 1 notch (the smallest it will allow). This will probably be all that is needed to make the difference to the note (EDIT: IN THE PIANISSIMO RANGE). Now play the note within a chromatic run and listen to the difference. Remember to play very quietly and evenly.

Do this for all the notes that seem louder/stand out.



I will continue with PART 2 tomorrow.

Stay Tuned!

Kindest Regards,

Chris

Last edited by sigasa (04-11-2012 13:17)

Re: Levelling irregular velocities using piano/mezzo/forte hammer hardness

I must admit I've never really noticed a problem. This could well be due to my less-than-nuanced playing ability, or preference for playing loud things, or just not listening for it.

Anyway, one thing I'm curious about is where the velocity errors come from. How does velocity detection usually work, and why is the mechanical measurement inaccurate? I've always assumed it is based on timing of signals from multiple sensors. If so, there's unlikely to be much error in the time measurement, but maybe the sensor placement or effective position can vary quite a bit?

And what do the errors look like, ie the standard deviation and worst cases? Can you provide some examples of your calibrations?

Re: Levelling irregular velocities using piano/mezzo/forte hammer hardness

Hi mooks

The simplest answer to you question "where do velocity errors come from" is that
they most commonly come from physical irregularities in keybed regulation. For example, if I apply exactly the same down force when playing two consecutive notes, and the second key has more inherent friction in it's downward travel, this second note is going to produce a 'quieter' sound i.e. a difference in velocity response.

I must admit as some of you already know, I've been messing with this velocity stuff for a few years now and an still learning! I guess I AM a little more fussy now as I can hear irregularities very clearly after so much practice. I've been working this morning on perfecting the Acuna88 response and still have work to do to achieve this, but I will say this, that there will probably be very little adjustment to the 'piano/pianissimo' range. Most of the adjustments will commonly be in the 'mezzo' range. I will work some more and, as indicated last night, attempt PART 2 of the 'tutorial' tonight.

As you request mooks, I will send some illustrations showing screen shots of corrected velocities and yes, there do tend to be patterns. If the keybed is twisted, there will be undulations and peaks and troughs etc. in the corrections.

More soon,

Kindest Regards,

Chris

Re: Levelling irregular velocities using piano/mezzo/forte hammer hardness

I have Pianoteq Pro 4 (w/Bluthner),and a Studiologic VMK 188 and I have a couple
of observations (in my first post) that might  be of interest, I think.

The VMK188 does have some slight variations in velocity, mostly from black keys to
white.



So far I have not used the Hammer Hardness to offset these discrepencies, per se. What I have
used is a midi filter application  in host "Cantabile Performer" . this midi app is called
"Pitch Based velocity Ramp". With that app, you can adjust each keys' velocity offset
(before Pianoteq)individually. It's NOT a separate velocity curve per key, but is the best
thing I've found (so far) to even out this keyboard. (sorry if that solution is outside of
Modartt). I might try Sigasa's  Hammer Hardness method thing further.

Q for Sigasa, do you also use the volume per note edit along with the Hammer Hardness? My
perception is that the Hammer Hardness deals more with brightness than volume inequities.

One lingering question I have would be; Why does the  "Dynamics" slider not have a per note edit
in Pteq Pro?? I would like to know the official answer to that. It's kind-of  puzzling!

Also one big request for Modartt would be to make the "Velocity Curve" a per note edit in
Pteq Pro.  (hint, hint!!).

Anyway, I love Pianoteq Pro Bluthner, and I am interested in  your guy's ideas about how to
make it work better.

Rhombic

Re: Levelling irregular velocities using piano/mezzo/forte hammer hardness

Hi Rhombic

Yes, I've tried using volume note-for-note. What would be a brilliant addition to PianoTEQ PRO would be a note-for-note velocity curve as many, including yourself, have suggested. But what would be even better than this would be a note-for-note velocity curve WITH SLIDERS!

I'm going to have to work a bit more on the levelling before I can contribute further. I had hoped to be able to put some screen shots together etc., but I'm still not happy with my present results. It IS my current pastime so I will keep you guys posted regularly.

If anybody who has experience with 'toning' would like to contribute, feel free.
I tuned, but didn't tone, back in the day!

Kindest Regards,

Chris

Last edited by sigasa (04-11-2012 21:35)

Re: Levelling irregular velocities using piano/mezzo/forte hammer hardness

Rhombic, welcome to the PianoTEQ forum

Re: Levelling irregular velocities using piano/mezzo/forte hammer hardness

It surprises me that you need little adjustment to the pp-p range. If there was a friction variation, I would expect this to affect low velocity more than high. Or maybe there's just a fixed percentage error? Do you find that for a single key, the adjustment is roughly proportional to the velocity? I guess that will be clear in your numbers.

I don't have much faith in my ability to accurately control velocity in my playing and I've been wondering if I can do something more reliable. What do the sampling people use? I thought about playing pairs of notes at the same time with two fingers held tightly together. I don't think that would really reveal the subtleties you're seeing such as the friction variation, as it's comparing the results of "same velocity" rather than "same force".

Re: Levelling irregular velocities using piano/mezzo/forte hammer hardness

Sigasa said:
**Rhombic, welcome to the PianoTEQ forum**

Thanks Sigasa and all, I hope to improve Pteq by asking good questions.

I still say that the dynamics slider (per note edit) would be a valuable tool
in our quest to get these keyboards perfectly evened -out, velocity-wise.

rhombic

Last edited by rhombic (05-11-2012 12:10)

Re: Levelling irregular velocities using piano/mezzo/forte hammer hardness

mooks wrote:

It surprises me that you need little adjustment to the pp-p range. If there was a friction variation, I would expect this to affect low velocity more than high. Or maybe there's just a fixed percentage error? Do you find that for a single key, the adjustment is roughly proportional to the velocity? I guess that will be clear in your numbers.

To be honest, Fatar/Studiologic have actually done a very good job in improving their velocity response so I am not dealing with a sluggish action in the Acuna88. You are right about friction and it's effect on the ppp-p range. Whilst working with the NUMA Nero, I DID have to work on this range more, simply because it was more irregular.

I have been working on the Acuna again today and have begun to realise that there is an art to toning. The thing is, the aligning of the velocities requires one to listen very, very intently. The levelling usually requires the adjustment of all thee zones (piano/mezzo/forte) to produce the desired conformity. I'm going to do some more work tonight and will update tomorrow.

Kindest Regards,

Chris

Re: Levelling irregular velocities using piano/mezzo/forte hammer hardness

http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/8739/acuna88levelling1.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

here is an illustration of a single adjusted note

.mp3 demo to follow in a few minutes

Re: Levelling irregular velocities using piano/mezzo/forte hammer hardness

http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.p...ing_1_.mp3

In the above .mp3, two notes are repeated. They are the matching pair C# and D (next to middle C) where D was adjusted to match the C#.

I'm getting the hang of it I think. I sure hope to speed up - this one took quite a while!

Kindest Regards,

Chris

Re: Levelling irregular velocities using piano/mezzo/forte hammer hardness

Actually, listening through my iPod, it seems it needs a tweak in the forte range!
Will I tweak forever???

Re: Levelling irregular velocities using piano/mezzo/forte hammer hardness

sigasa wrote:

Actually, listening through my iPod, it seems it needs a tweak in the forte range!
Will I tweak forever???

If the Pianoteq internal algorithms do not mimic the effects achieved by those who voice real pianos by hammer adjustments then you very well might. What do you think so far?

Re: Levelling irregular velocities using piano/mezzo/forte hammer hardness

Mabry,

I think it IS achievable. I must point out at this point that I set ALL unison widths at level. This enables me to hear the differences in velocities clearly without those differences being coloured by variances in unison width.
The .mp3 (Acuna88 levelling 1) uses uniform unison width.

What do think? I think my hard work will pay off eventually!

Kindest Regards,

Chris

Re: Levelling irregular velocities using piano/mezzo/forte hammer hardness

I now have two notes in sync http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.p...ling_2.mp3

Turns out it didn't need such a big adjustment after all. I will post an image shortly

Kindest Regards,

Chris

Re: Levelling irregular velocities using piano/mezzo/forte hammer hardness

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/4885/acuna88levelling2.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Re: Levelling irregular velocities using piano/mezzo/forte hammer hardness

As is probably most apparent to those who've followed my posts, that levelling in this way is very time intensive. I would liken it to learning to tune, as I did 20 years ago. Both tuning and toning require careful listening. Likewise this method of levelling velocity response. Therefore, I would advise anyone wishing to replicate this method of adjustment to first ask themselves, "Do I really have the time necessary to dedicate to this cause?" For those who's answer to this question is "Yes", I will say this, that if you are patient you may well achieve your desired results so stick at. However, as I say, you will have to be very patient with yourself. That said, for me anyway, although it has been labour intensive, I have found the while process immensely enjoyable, satisfying and rewarding.

Kindest Regards,

Chris