Topic: Sound, dependent on equipment and adjustment
Hi - I found here many happy people - and some very harsh critics.
For me ALL this critisism is not very helpful, when equipment and adjustment oft this equipment, and even adjustment of pianoteq, is not mentioned. For me, this point of right adjustment is not easy to handle.
Using AKG phones direktly on my EMU 1616m, I first heard the nice and natural piano sound.
My even expensive transmissionline speakers gave a very dull sound - artificial, not piano like.
The headphone experience showed very well, where the mistake was. It was a very hard work, to adjust speakers in the room, amp, subwoofer that it sounds similar to a piano IN THIS SPECIAL ROOM. On one hand, speakers are never a piano - but one can do a lot - right or wrong way! A common mistake is f.e., that the subwoofer is adjusted too loud. In this case an upgrade, giving more bass and "fullness" - will sound very unnatural compared to a bright smaller sound. This is only one example, how an improvement can make it more worse to some people.
At the first time I heard Pianoteq on a CD from a music test magazine. They tried to be ABSOLUTELY objective. They made ONE midi file and tested all the virtual instruments. Pianoteq sounds VERY artificial. Later I came to the homepage of Pianoteq, heard some examples with my headphones and liked it much. By this, I learned, that you have to play an instrument - live with it - that a maschine-like test with a midi file played on another instrument is a mistake and even not objective.
After buying it, I had this hard difference between headphone sound and speakers and had some hard work to like it again. I think, even a real piano you can make sound bad by giving it a wrong place and a bad sounding room.
For me, adjustment is much more a critical point than how Pianoteq sounds by itself - this I can get directly behind D.A. of my interface by studio-headphones and is always a little bit better than speakers and room.
greets George