Topic: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

The story first then there are questions.

I am a classically trained pianist, now aged 54, so I imagine that makes me quite old here. I have owned severl Steinways, in years gone bye, including 2 model D's one of 1946 vintage and another 1993, a truly superb instrument. A while ago I fell on hard times and was then without a piano for 2-3 years. Last year I met a rock musician who had some classical training and we talked about pianos, he showed me his studio where he had a ProKeys88 (MAudio) and a rig using Stenberg Grand2.

Quite impressive I thought!

So I reseacched and eventually about 8 months ago purchased a CME UF8 and then a copy of Synthogy Ivory.  I built a high powered PC based around an AMD 5200 chip with a WD Raptor 10,000rpm drive and 2 gigs of RAM.

I was more impressed!!!

Until YESTERDAY when I discovered Pianoteq. Ladies and Genetlemen of this user forum, this product defies all belief. It is fantastic, I cannot believe the sensitivity it provides at key level, and I have not yet started to tweek the settings.

Thank you design and development team!!

Now the questions:

I have been trying to identify a better keyboard. The CME UF8 is not bad, but it is noisy and has no escapment. The best keyboard I have found is that inside the Yamaha CLP280 which has wooden keys, but it seems excessive to buy a full blown digital piano only to use the keyboard mechanism.

Fatar advertise a TP/40Wood but this is a chassis keyboard, does anyone know anything about this?  I have tried to get a response from Fatar but no luck and I don't speakl Italian. Is ti possible that this is the Yamaha CLP280 keybed? Is it sold in any other Midi keyboard????

If it was possible to buy a TP/40wood chassis from Fatar how complex will it be to get a MIDI output from it??? Does anyone know??

I am using a pair of Tascam VL-X5 studio monitors which I plan to build into a stand with the speakers facing away from the keyboard back, pointing upward at 45 degrees to try and emulate the sound created by a grand. Any comments here also appreciated. I had also thought about using a high end surround sound system on the corners of the stand. I am buying the GPP-3 next week.

All comments will be very greatfully received. Mark Hensby

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

If I was looking for a quality weighted keyboard, I'd look for a high quality out-of-production piano (i.e. Yamaha p80) used and, rather than use the on-board sound, use it as a controller.

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

Hello Mark,

thanks for sharing your story. It is interesting that even a seasoned Steinway user would seem to get along with pianoteq.

I cannot tell you anything about the models you mentioned, but my experience is at least related.

I have a Yamaha P-80 (discontinued, as mentioned by Doug) for live gigs (this is absolutely built like a tank and totally reliable) and a Fatar / Studiologic 880 "pro" at home. Fatar should have omitted the "pro" tag since this thing is rather rickety and really hasn't good velocity response. It somehow works, but I am looking for something better.

The P-80 has great dynamics and a sturdy construction, very precise, but quite a hard key bottom. When you pound on it for a while, your fingers / joints may hurt a bit. Otherwise, it is more on the "doughy" side, and smooth playing is a bit difficult. That is easier on the Fatar (whose keys also are a bit lighter). Maybe it is good practice to have a P-80 at home.

I played on the P-80 successors P-90 and P-120, and I'd say they are too light and thus more difficult to control in the soft range. But that may be a matter of practice/adaption too. Anyway, they also feel a bit more "plasticly".

One important factor is connections for pedals. P-80 has one switch (not graded), and that's it. Fatar has one switch and one continuous controller. PTQ can map the resulting MIDI control messages of the pedals to anything, and you could connect an appropriate pedal to the "volume" jack to have half-pedalling sustain, connect a second switch to the original "sustain" jack and route that to left (una corda). PTQ nicely remembers those controller mappings after shutdown.

Clavinovas, to my knowledge, have at least a continuous sustain pedal. It is also good to have a compact housing (for home use, anyway) so there are no keyboard stand and cable issues. The pedals are firmly in place, the playing height is roughly optimal and the whole thing does not look like a recording studio.

Finally, if you're after the ultimate solution, there is the Yamaha GranTouch series (GT2) with a real Yamaha grand action (escapement!) but absent of strings and soundboard (a built-in sampled piano, but with PTQ, you can forget about that). It is some 9500 bucks though, and weighs a bold 100 kg (220 pounds). But I guess that's as close as it gets at the moment. This thing has two continuous pedals (sustain and una corda), and apart from the mini grand housing, even an integrated sound system which also features audio inputs (for your computer).

This is on my wishlist. It's Xmas soon

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

The Fatar TP-40 looks like a bare rack of keys. To get a functioning MIDI keyboard would require additionally circuitry to gather, encode, and transmit playing information. If you must have this keyboard, it may be possible to retrofit it into an existing chassis, AFAIK there are no standards about this, but substituting it for an existing Fatar unit would seem hopeful. Fatar's website allegedly has mechanical and electrical specifications available if you have password access (I haven't). However, it may be easier to locate an example of the VMK-188 Plus which has the (same?) Grand Touch (TM) action and connections for 3 pedal inputs.

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

Thank you hyper.real. I have thought about stripping apart a VMK-188.  However, and to my amazement, my CME-UF8 is better to play with Pianiteq, it seems more sensitive, so I am in less of a hurry. I just got a GPP-3 which is brilliant, and better than I was expecting. I am still using the demo version of Pianoteq, but will purchase a copy in the next few weeks. then Synthogy Ivory will be redundant.  I'll start an other thread on speakers and will be keen for you kiind comments. Thanks again Mark

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

Hi guys. Very good reading. Let me also suggest Kawai's stage piano MP8II. It is the brand new successor to the MP8, having wooden keys (all keys and not only the white keys as on the CLP280) and many positive comments from users so far. At the PianoWorld forum you can find many similar discussions.

Regards,
Niclas

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

Yeah Yamaha GranTouch series (GT2) is very ,very good with Pianoteq , only we have very little problem , that when we connect PC sound card output to Yamaha Aux input ( to play thru Yamaha speakers } , this input is too much sensitive , and we must adjust too much volume level down, on sound card or Pianoteq ,this is not good to do, because volume is down in digital , and we have lost resolution,so we decide to "repair" little Yamaha and make sensitivity lower in GT2 preamplifier , because GranTouch don't have Aux input level adjust . Now is OK, after "repair" , we have best sound , sensitivity , touch response , and satisfaction... ahhhh .

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

I have a Fatar Midi controller, and a Roland Digital Grand piano.  I also am interested in the Fatar TP/40Wood action.  I don't know what production keyboards use it, the Fatar/StudioLogic site doesn't say.... rather frustrating.

I can tell you something though about emulating a grand piano.... I too am a classically trained pianist, but I gig a lot and compose a lot.

It's best to use a good set of studio monitors, (I like the M-audio bi-amped BX9s) and let the sound module create the room sound.  A good sound module will emulate the room quite accurately, and even imitate sympathetic vibrations in the piano as does my Roland KR-977.

I also am impressed with the synth engine of IK multimedia's program called Sample Tank.  It has really good algorithms that create very smooth transitions in the samples.   There's a free version on their website with decent grand piano samples.  You can import many sample formats and play with them, also the pay version of Sample Tank comes with a lot more samples.

Let me know if anyone finds out about the TP/40Wood action in a production keyboard.

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

To go back to the opening post...

While searching for information to help me choose a weighted controller 'board I found this on the Yamaha.com site:

http://www.yamaha.com/yamahavgn/cda/fla...player.asp

Amongst other things it does a really good job of explaining the three different types of keyboard they put in their digital pianos. I was looking at the P-85, but with the benefit of this information I would now favour the P-140 as it has the same mechanism as the CP300 for a fraction of the price. It costs a bit more than the P-85, but there are side benefits that help justify the price difference.

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

YAMAHA recently came out with a serie of controller keyboards.
The KX 8 has an 88 keys piano action keyboard.
I think it is the same keyboard as the CP 300 stage piano but I can't find much infos on it quite yet.

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

Perhaps you would try the new Vax77 from Infinite Response...

A very new manufacturer with a user weighted keybed...
Start wit the 43 gram stock weight or specify from the available weights...
27, 35, 43, 60, 70, 80 gram keyweights.


The Vax 77 generates the new HIGH RESOLUTION Velocity prefix(cc88),
from the lightest to hardest strikes there are over 16,000 levels of volume expression... up from the old 127 limit...Constant force springs deliver perfectly uniform keyweight throughout the keystroke, giving the fastest possible action...

http://www.infiniteresponse.com/

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

I have been waiting to purchase a VAX77 for a year and a half.  They are struggling valiantly to get it on the market.

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

yeah it's been a while since tthe VAX77 was announced,
still no sign of it emerging from vapourware yet!

I was reading about its magnesium case! Is that wise...?
Would be pretty spectacular on stage if Keith Emerson set fire to one, I guess.
Do they make chocolate fireguards as well? :0)

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

I have a CME UF8 and a Fatar Studiologic SL850 and just bought a Fatar NUMA.  I have a lot of fondness for the playing and sound of the SL850.  The CME is all right, but I don't like the velocity curves in it.  It is also a really cheaply made keyboard that is a pain to program...I broke a key one night during a gig.  Could have bought a new key bed but decided to take it apart.  The keys are attached with what looks like superglue.  Anyway the repair was cheap and fast ----> superglue.  I purchased a Yamaha KX-8 and after a day, sent it back.  The Yamaha had a nice feel and pianoteq sounded really good.  The keyboard had some short comings for my use.  It transmits on one midi channel at a time.  There is no input for a second midi pedal (eg midi volume).  Midi control is very lacking.  This is a nice keyboard but seems to be focused on running your DAW at home.  They spent a lot of time supplying templates and an appegiator

Before the NUMA I also purchased a Studiologic VMK-188Plus.  After one day, I sent that one back too.  Pianoteq sounded terrible on it.  Turns out that while it has a lot of midi capability (faders, buttons and knobs).  There is no velocity control.  Also you cannot split or layer the keyboard.  Now to the NUMA.  It is really a wonderful feeling and sounding keyboard, and very easy to program.  It is the best feeling midi controller I've ever sat down and played.  In the past I would only play my midi keys at a gig.  Now I am enjoying it as much as a real piano.  It permits user-defined velocity as well as three standard curves.  This one I kept.

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

Numa  numa?

Should they finally have heard my prayer for a quality keyboard controller with bus powered USB, two pedal connectors, only few buttons, WITHOUT a (quickly-outdated, non-upgradable) tone generator but WITH a housing large enough to accomodate a MacBook on top?

It's a shame such a thing hasn't come along in such a long time, but when this is it, I will give it a serious look!

I wasn't too inspired with the Studiologic SL990 (or so), but this looks like a very different category. Thanks for the hint!

One question: Can one connnect a continuous control pedal (volume etc.) to one of the jack, or is it just two switches?

Thanks!

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

I am using a sustain pedal in one of the jacks and a continuous midi volume controller in the other jack.   Yay!

Bill

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

Yeah! I used to schlep an additional Edirol Mini USB Keyboard just to have that control pedal input... (Plus some knobs, but mainly for the volume pedal)

PS. That strangely positioned Mod Wheel -- is that spring-loaded (like a pitch bender) or will it stay at where you set it (like the classic mod wheel)?

Thanks again
Dominik

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

wclapham wrote:

I am using a sustain pedal in one of the jacks and a continuous midi volume controller in the other jack.   Yay!

Bill

Does the sustain jack accept continuous CC input? My x-station, shockingly, only accepts on/off.

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

Regarding the 2nd jack of the numa.  It does accept continuous midi control.  As far as the mod wheel goes.  It is in a weird place--weird only because we are used to having it on top.  It is rather nice to have the top of the keyboard flat and clean.  The mod wheel is NOT spring loaded, and is fully programmable to what ever control cc you want to send it.

Bill

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

Found some more info:

Two Pedal Inputs: Either continuous, open switch or closed switch style pedals may be connected and used with the StudioLogic Numa. This allows use of volume / swell type pedals, sustain pedals and standard on/off footswitches. The pedals may be assigned to controller numbers 0 -127 and a positive or negative polarity may be set for their operation.

http://www.arbiter.co.uk/studiologic/numa.htm

All that all looks very interesting to me...

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

Check out the Doepfer PK88, see http://www.doepfer.de/home_e.htm .

I have a Fatar Studiologic SL-990 Pro which is nice enough. It's all rather subjective though, ideally you should try them out.

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

Mark:

Here are 2 more MIDI controller keyboards that you might look at (I use both):

M-Audio AXIOM
Yamaha KX

The Axiom has been around 2 years or more -- "semiweighted" synth feel, aftertouch.
The Yamaha is new, light, no aftertouch, simplified, no weighting. 

Both have USB powered computer connections, MIDI in/out, control wheels.   The Axiom is about twice the weight of the Yamaha.

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

I have plenty of cheapo keybeds that are bearable.
Action is never an issue with me as having done many live performances and recitals over the years you tend to have to play whatever you have set up already. This has taught me that most keybeds can be used w/o problems. Even the old spring keybeds that are horrific can be played.

So I tend to get excited by features for live performance instead of the " perfect " action which after 3 decades still doesn't exist on anything but a real Piano. No problem. I have endurance issues after 2 hours on a real Piano, so these fake peices of crap we use at the gig are a breeze.

The VAX77 looks different, and I will test that out at their booth in 5 weeks. PAT and many new features look promising, but so far it only talks the talk.

On the other hand for live guys, the CME UF50 w/ WIDI looks to be a fierce little performer.
If you notice it has wireless MIDI ( WIDI ). Big deal right? Actually it is for a gigging musician. Plenty of controls and a little secret most guys don't know is the MIDI Solutions F8. Wireless connected gear is easy with this as it has 8 x outputs for pedals, so the days of having to velcro your pedals and plug them in the back are gone.
Using the F8 and new wireless technologies that are emerging make live gigs lots of fun.
I have used the F8 for a few years for keyswitching live. I need both of my hands when I play and I never liked the one hand on the wheel solo jive anyway.Expression pedals and footswitches are far better suited IMO. Use the F8 to control note on/offs instead of wasting an entire left hand to do a horn section swell, etc.
I will still go and see the same regurgitations from the " real Piano " action claims, but it will be the same as it has everyyear.
If these same companies would spend more on new technologies instead of marketing slogans we might get something eventually.
Sadly only new companies are brave enough to break out of the current consumer products mold. How many years can the same little jpeg's of virtual hammers and useless techno babble work...?
Yamaha, Roland, Fatar, Korg, M Audio seem to think for at least another decade as their current controllers demonstrate.

Hardware Analog, DSP, PhysMod. VSTi Romplers....

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

markh wrote:

The story first then there are questions.

Fatar advertise a TP/40Wood but this is a chassis keyboard, does anyone know anything about this?  I have tried to get a response from Fatar but no luck and I don't speakl Italian. Is ti possible that this is the Yamaha CLP280 keybed? Is it sold in any other Midi keyboard????

If it was possible to buy a TP/40wood chassis from Fatar how complex will it be to get a MIDI output from it??? Does anyone know??

Hi, I'm exactly interested in the same. I'm italian and I've already written to Fatar, asking how to buy a bare TP/40W mechanic, but no answer so far.

It's really interesting, because it's available with optional escapment kit that neither NUMA Nero has.


AVAILABLE OPTIONALS:
- AFT: 2 strip of monophonic Aftertouch
- ES: mechanical Escapment Touch Feeling Kit

Any news from other sides?

TY

Last edited by qbert (24-06-2010 20:30)

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

I'm interested in the TP/40Wood keybed also.

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

Has anyone tried a StudioLogic NumaPiano? If so, what's your verdict on it.

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

Fatar only delivers to keyboard manufacturers, not individual private persons. And unfortunately they indeed do not respond to private persons.

There is one company though, called Doepfer, who can order a Fatar keyboard on customer's request. But then there's no service included; i.e. guarantee for spare parts in future etc. Doepfer also delivers the Fatar TP10 with service. They use this keybed in their own products.
Doepfer also delivers the electronics to connect the keybed to computer via midi or usb (depending on model and requirements).

Last edited by hvaartsen (29-06-2010 07:37)

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

Thanks hvaartsen!

I got in contact with italian Doepfer dealer and they have just replyed me. It looks a positive response!

Now I'm waiting a quotation for:

TP/40W mechanic

with:

- AFT: 2 strip of monophonic Aftertouch
- ES: mechanical Escapment Touch Feeling Kit
- chassy  (www.fatar.com/Pages/Chassy.html)


If someone is interested, I'll keep you informed.

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

i have a yamaha p-155.  it's alright.  but it doesn't give that bounce that is needed for fast repeated notes and trills. 

i sent back two of the kawaii mp8ii pianos because the keys were clicking and were uneven.  i don't think they are made very well.  the yamaha p-155 is made well, i think.  i'm happy with it, i guess.  i haven't played on anything better. 

that new yamaha cp1 got my hopes up.  i thought that was going to be great, but it's not.  it's awful.  the keys are so light.  it feels nothing like a real piano.  i don't know what they were thinking.  i guess if you want to play the titanic theme song, it's good.  but for scarlatti, forget it.

i also tried the roland v-piano.  it was ok.  but action-wise no better than the yamaha p-155. 

i don't understand why someone hasn't made a midi keyboard that feels just like a real grand piano.  i'm no craftsman, but it seems like something that is very doable.  you take a real piano, throw away the strings and the soundboard and have the hammers hit sensors instead.  the hammers need to be the same length as a real piano.  so the keyboard needs to be a bit deeper than they make them now.  am i asking for something that is unreasonable?  do they really not have something like this already? 

have you guys seen those midi organs?  those are serious instruments.  4 keyboards, buttons, full wooden pedal board, everything.  and they sell for about $2700.  to me that is reasonable.   they need something like that for pianists.  get rid of all those knobs, switches, speakers, and flashing red-lights.  built-in demo songs?  who wants to listen to elevator music when they are not in the elevator?

that's what pianoteq needs to do next!  make a keyboard.  that would be hot.

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

It's quite awful, but this should be what you're looking for!

http://www.petrof.com/midi-grand-piano.html

Anyway, I would like to know your opinion on the new Kawai RH3 action.

Actually, according to most, new Kawai pianos CA 63/93 look to provide  the best piano feeling.

Last edited by qbert (08-07-2010 08:50)

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

qbert,

thanks for the information. 
that does appear to be what i'm looking for.
why do you say it is awful?  does it not work well with pianoteq?

sorry, i haven't played on the ca 63/93.  if i do i will let you know

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

rjawad1 wrote:

why do you say it is awful?  does it not work well with pianoteq?

I'm sure it will work at the best with pianoteq and every other sw pianos... but it has an ugly looking! Just an opinion, of course!

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

If you want to start with a TP40 set of keys and build it all up from there it is probably worth visiting the midiworks site for the electronics, midi encoders, whatever all else.

They are primarily organ parts suppliers, so be careful that any sensors come in 88 not 61 size sets and have VELOCITY, remember that organ keys are basically on/off.

Don't get distracted and start building a 5 manual plus pedal board instrument with 150 (virtual) ranks :-D

Start here;
http://www.midiworks.ca/index.php/products

Last edited by tractor_music (02-05-2012 19:33)

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

The "numa nero" mount the TP4W Keyboard

http://www.fatar.com/studiologic/Pages/NUMANERO.html

Last edited by paolopiano (02-05-2012 18:08)

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

rjawad1 wrote:

i have a yamaha p-155.  it's alright.  but it doesn't give that bounce that is needed for fast repeated notes and trills. 

i sent back two of the kawaii mp8ii pianos because the keys were clicking and were uneven.  i don't think they are made very well.  the yamaha p-155 is made well, i think.  i'm happy with it, i guess.  i haven't played on anything better. 

that new yamaha cp1 got my hopes up.  i thought that was going to be great, but it's not.  it's awful.  the keys are so light.  it feels nothing like a real piano.  i don't know what they were thinking.  i guess if you want to play the titanic theme song, it's good.  but for scarlatti, forget it.

i also tried the roland v-piano.  it was ok.  but action-wise no better than the yamaha p-155. 

i don't understand why someone hasn't made a midi keyboard that feels just like a real grand piano.  i'm no craftsman, but it seems like something that is very doable.  you take a real piano, throw away the strings and the soundboard and have the hammers hit sensors instead.  the hammers need to be the same length as a real piano.  so the keyboard needs to be a bit deeper than they make them now.  am i asking for something that is unreasonable?  do they really not have something like this already? 

have you guys seen those midi organs?  those are serious instruments.  4 keyboards, buttons, full wooden pedal board, everything.  and they sell for about $2700.  to me that is reasonable.   they need something like that for pianists.  get rid of all those knobs, switches, speakers, and flashing red-lights.  built-in demo songs?  who wants to listen to elevator music when they are not in the elevator?

that's what pianoteq needs to do next!  make a keyboard.  that would be hot.

There have been "Strings free" electronic pianos in which the hammers hit transducers.
There is a LOT of cost in the soundboard, case, strings, plate, etc of a physical piano, plus skilled labor, but good key beds and actions aren't cheap either (WNG, etc.).

Organs really are very different in this respect, their keys are simple on/off switches, there is no velocity component.

www.midiworks.ca IS worth browsing though, just for casual interest :-D

Re: A Story, then Keyboards - Fatar, CME, et all

I just scrolled back to the root post.
In reviewing the date and pianoteq's update history it would APPEAR that the O/P, who claimed to have owned several Steinways, including a couple of Ds, was totally impressed by PTQ 2.x

Some possibilities suggest themselves, but I shall refrain.

Suffice to say that my purchase this week of a NOS (New, Old Stock) version of Pianoteq turned out to be Version 2.1 - only discovered after opening the box.
I was able to upgrade to V4.0.2 within minutes of registering my serial number.
I may have tin ears, but I think I can detect significant improvements :-D

I wonder if the O/P would like to comment on their impressions from Sept 2007 against their physical  Ds
and how they feel about 4.0.2

Last edited by tractor_music (03-05-2012 12:14)