Topic: Technical specs for replicating physical piano

Hey guys! I know we have a forum of experienced individuals here, and I'm looking for a bit of advice on a pretty cool idea...

tl;dr: I want to modify a piano with speakers to make Pianoteq look and sound like a real piano, and have questions about the specs I'm looking for.

Pianoteq does a wonderful job of modeling physical properties of piano cabinets and room sizes  for when listening in headphones, but what about simulating a true piano? I'm looking to modify an antique square grand piano by removing the key deck and put my midi controller inside (when disassembled it's the same dimensions) and remove the sound board and put in some speakers.

The goal is for listeners to experience an authentic piano sound from an authentic piano case, but with pianoteq inside.

Some presumptions about physical pianos to be taken into account:

  • It seems that pianos put out about 98 to 112 dB at the sound board

  • 6 dB headroom would be nice.

  • The frequency range of a piano being about 28Hz to 60kHz, including harmonics and LF vibrations

  • It's unfair to expect headphone-like dynamic range from speakers, sure, but how close matters?

The speakers I'm looking at on the "PA" side of things:

  • QSC K8: 61Hz-20kHz, 127dB, $600

  • QSC K12: 48Hz-20kHz, 131dB, $850

  • Electro-Voice ZXA1-90: 48Hz-20kHz, 123dB, $600

The speakers I'm looking at on the "Studio Monitor" side of things:

  • Adam A8X: 38Hz-50kHz, 120dB, $1000

  • Adam A5X: 50Hz-50kHz, 110dB, $500

  • Dynaudio BM6A MkII: 40Hz-21kHz (@-3dB response), 119dB (pair), $750

So there's a huge difference in mentality between studio monitors and PAs with flatness of tone across the spectrum and directionality, but I'm not a sound engineer; I just want to avoid sounding like it's a recording of a piano rather than a real piano. I'd like to start bringing speakers home to test them, but knowing what to look for and what questions to ask would be immensely helpful.

  • Are my original presumptions about piano's sound anywhere close?

  • Should I completely disregard studio monitors for their inability to fill a room with sound?

  • Should I disregard PAs for their inability to replicate accurate sound?

  • Is it really possible within a budget of say $1500 to replicate the sound of a piano using speakers at all?

  • My interface is an mbox mini. Does that matter?

The piano in question to pique your interest:
http://cat.pdx.edu/~hunner/piano.jpg

Last edited by Hunner (02-02-2012 03:35)

Re: Technical specs for replicating physical piano

When I look at the photograph, I take a sudden deep breath and say WAIT. I can understand wanting to put a keyboard into this piano, but I hope you won't dramatically change (wreck) it. Please, don't destroy this piano. Many tuners and piano technicians hate these square pianos because they are difficult to work on, and some may tell you that these pianos can't be restored.  They can be restored. And yours might just need a good tuning.

So my first impulse is to say that, if you are not in a financial position to restore it, assuming that it needs repair, set it aside and find a console or upright on Craigs list or Ebay to hold your keyboard. On the other hand, if you can leave it unmolested and still remove the keyboard and insert a midi keyboard, then I don't worry. But can you?

These instruments are rare and have a sound all their own, although flawed from a modern viewpoint. Have you had a rare instrument dealer look at it? Not someone who deals in antiques in general, but someone who specializes in old pianos?

A smaller, but decent sounding, restored square piano:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zCFczyR...re=related

Here is a square piano that is closer to yours in size and that badly needs a general tuning, unison tuning, and other work, but it may give you another  idea of how this piano can sound. Clearly problematic and "old-sounding", but so are old Gibson archtop guitars:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zO0dxJwKWw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hk-DvPaW...mp;list=UL

Very "old timey" but that sound has a value.

By the way, what make is your piano? Do you know the builder and the year it was made? Have you had it tuned recently or inspected? (It may not have a cast-iron harp, and it may need to have A set to under 440).

Last edited by Jake Johnson (18-06-2013 07:51)

Re: Technical specs for replicating physical piano

I just want to tell that I'm completely with you, Jake! Why destroy such a beautiful piece ?! And, yes, it would probably need a tuning at somewhere between A = 415 / 428 Hz.

This being said, except if you have a very large room, a pair of monitors should be able to "fill" it, and more so if you complement them with a sub: their task will be easier. I would suggest a pair of Adam A5x + a sub of the same brand, they have several models.

Last edited by Luc Henrion (02-02-2012 09:40)

Re: Technical specs for replicating physical piano

The strong emotions raised by these old square pianos are surprising. Here's a sampling from the Piano World forum, with one person saying that the piano is both musically and financially worthless, and two other people supporting a restoration project and liking the "old sound."

http://www.pianoworld.com/forum/ubbthre...659/1.html

But the piano mentioned in that thread was in very bad shape, so I'm not sure that I would have much hope for getting it to sound good. The pic posted by Hunner, on the other hand, showed an instrument that looks as though it's at least been kept clean.

Hmm. Come to think of it, would a PT version of an old square piano be good? We have several fortes, but no square....

Last edited by Jake Johnson (02-02-2012 17:41)

Re: Technical specs for replicating physical piano

Thanks for the feedback! Don't worry... I'm looking to change it as little as possible.

The piano is a Chickering & Sons from the 1870s; really beautiful. It's pretty much exactly the same piano as the first one pictured on http://www.antiquepianoshop.com/restora...-packages/ which has a quote of $15,000 - $18,000 for a full restoration.

The piano is not in a bad condition, but the problem is that we've already put a few thousand into restringing it, and had it tuned a few times. There is a crack in the harp which is a "serious problem" and it doesn't hold a tune for more than an hour. The action on most of the keys is way out of whack, also. It could cost a lot in parts and labor to have it repaired. Getting an evaluation would be a good thing, though :).

The key/lever deck is about 4 inches high and goes all the way to the back of the piano where it pushes on the hammers. The whole deck can be slid out without changing anything and I was hoping to disassemble my old RD-300S (like in http://www.svend.net/roland-rd300s/roland-rd300s.html) and put the keys and circuit boards into the space of the key deck. I can put a switch pedal where the rod for the real pedal pushes up underneath to account for that. I'll try to take pictures of the process, if anyone is interested.

For speakers, I didn't want to modify the piano; I was hoping discrete placement would still give a realistic sound.

I'm still interested in the physics of simulating a physical piano's sound and loudness without sounding like a recorded CD, so I'll check out the A5Xs and an Adam sub.

Last edited by Hunner (02-02-2012 18:08)

Re: Technical specs for replicating physical piano

Ooo yeah, a PT square would be pretty awesome! They were designed to be an easier fit inside a home and sometimes called "parlor pianos" because that's where they were often kept. I guess it has a pretty light action and bright tone without clear harmonics compared to a full grand. I've never heard it played perfectly however, since mine has never been in that condition mechanically .

Last edited by Hunner (02-02-2012 18:11)

Re: Technical specs for replicating physical piano

Hunner, did you consinder to install a PNOscan, andere leave the piano and action in the original state?

Wim.

Re: Technical specs for replicating physical piano

I looked at the PNOscan website but couldn't really find much info about the price, process, and what modifications would need to be done to the piano. I didn't give it much more thought.

Re: Technical specs for replicating physical piano

Hunner, send an e-mail to info@qrsmusic.nl. I am happy to provide you with all information.

Let's try to keep your piano in its original state.

Wim.

Re: Technical specs for replicating physical piano

As you probably know, Chickering pianos were some of the best of the era. I found a video of a Chickering square with better sound than the other two videos:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNIaUxzI2n4

After listening to this, I certainly want Pianoteq to develop a model of this piano. And of course it makes me want to continue my perhaps unwanted, presumptive suggestion that you study the possibility of doing a few repairs on it.

After reading about the cracked harp and the problem with holding a tuning, I have to ask: Was it in the past mistakenly tuned to A440? My understanding is that that would be the exact recipe for cracking the harp, loosening the grip on the pins, and loosening the pin block and\or loosening the agraffes.

If you have had it restrung, then you've doubtless spoken with a technician, so I'm sorry if this advice is unneeded, but...if it's currently tuned to around A440, my advice would be to immediately (today) lower the pitch, or the situation will get worse--the harp crack will possibly widen and the pins or pin block and\or agraffes will almost certainly pull out further. These pianos just weren't made for that much tension. (Sorry to raise all of this, and to detract or distract from your interesting and valid intention but a Chickering is not a thing to let deteriorate if you can prevent it by simply lowering the pitch.)

Not an easy decision--when to give up on a piano. One consideration is that while the needed repairs may not be inexpensive, they may not cost nearly as much as one might fear. A complete restoration usually means a complete refinishing of the wood, adding new shanks and new hammers, a new action, and new strings. You've already had the new strings installed. Even with the cracked harp, you may just need to have the pins replaced with oversized pins. Things might be worse: you may need to have the agraffes reseated and re-glued or even a new pin block, if its pulled loose. (See http://www.jonespianohouse.com/JPH_Harpo.htm for one condensed source of information) The good people in the teq forum at http://www.pianoworld.com/forum/ubbthre...Forum.html usually have generous and practical advice, too, although, again, I would expect to get a mixture of views. If you post there, do mention that it is a Chickering that is at issue. )

Cheers. Looking forward to hearing what you do and more generally to learning what suggestion arise about putting speakers into a piano cabinet, whether it's this piano or another. (I've read that in creating the Avant Grand, the speakers were placed where the close mics were placed when the samples were recorded.)

Sorry for the long post. I just love the sound of the Chickering in that recording on the Schaffer site.   

In any event, your piano teq can advise you, obviously, much better than I can about the minimal repairs to get it into basic shape.

Last edited by Jake Johnson (03-02-2012 04:45)

Re: Technical specs for replicating physical piano

Regrding "speakers offering the dynamics of headphones" and speaker radiation characteristics: It is true that most loudspeakers tend to sound like "speakers" in that they are always focused, much more focused like the large soundboard of a real piano (even if it's high end speakers that get sound spectrum and dynamics right).

I think that's the main issue with playing pianoteq. It sounds like squeezed in a narrow spot.

I once attended a demo session of Ohm speakers. These are basically broadband omnidirectional speakers. They do have an extra tweeter that is directional, but all of the midrange (up to 8k or so) is radiated to all sides.

These speakers have the effect that you can move outside the sweet spot and do not get the same sonic shifts you get with conventional speakers. And they were the first speakers I ever got to hear that basically sounded like my open design AKG K601 headphones (which I love).

It was a listening session only and I did not have the opportunity to play PTQ through them, but I liked the open and soft sound very much. I could not afford these speakers until now but would likely get some if I could.

Re. the restoration issue: If you can afford an expensive restoration of that old piano, fine, but don't expect to get a very precise or responsive instrument. Unless you're rebuilding (or replacing) most of the interior. I don't care much for nostalgia when it comes to musical instruments.

IMO, an instrument should be judged by its performance and not by its appearance or the fact that it might have been "really good" in 1840. That's different with furniture, but after all it is still an instrument!

Re: Technical specs for replicating physical piano

re: " nostalgia"... I don't think it's nostalgia per se, but if you listen to music composed for pianoforte played on a pianoforte, it takes a... "new" dimension! I recently recorded the well known Schubert's "sonata for arpeggione" with musicians playing an arpeggione (not a viola or a cello, as usual) and a Graf pianoforte. Believe me you re-discover the piece completely ! I don't say that you are not allowed to play Beethoven on a new piano, I just say it is different and very revealing to play on an instrument he could have played himself...

Re: Technical specs for replicating physical piano

@Luc re. Nostalgia…

Sure. But the question is, can and will you and I afford to grab an antique piano from bulk garbage and put huge amounts of money in the restoration until it is halfway playable again? I can't, and I wouldn't even if I could.

Last edited by Gizmao (03-02-2012 11:56)

Re: Technical specs for replicating physical piano

@ Gizmao: I think I would try... it depends on what you call "huge amount" of money of course ! ;-)
I recently put 2000 euros in my (from 1949) Gunther grand to get a better action and it's worth every cent, I play it every day with such a pleasure now ! I thought I couldn't play fast trills, well, in fact I can !!! :-)

And about the guys I recorded (in another piece and on another piano) and the beauty of old (forte)pianos:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsCn8lbRG3I

Last edited by Luc Henrion (03-02-2012 12:27)

Re: Technical specs for replicating physical piano

@ Luc
Good recording, good video as well. I just think today's sound of that Steingräber (or any other vintage piano) may be a bit misleading. I figure it sounded more precise then, more in tune, not so "old" and worn-out. There's no way of proving unless one would actually rebuild such a model with all due precision.

So maybe the "nostalgic" tone would be something Liszt himself (or Beethoven) wouldn't have enjoyed a lot.

In fact, there is much music that does not sound particularly well on a worn-out piano (and wouldn't likely have been written that way). Imagine Feux Follets on a slow, sloppy and out-of-tune vintage grand where each note rings for another .5 to 1 second or so after release. I think those Steingraeber's and Pleyel's did sound much more tight and "new" back then.

2000 € is a lot though certainly not too much for a 1949 piano. After all, many models from after 1930 (or so) are not exactly hopeless in terms of restoration. Any attempt on a 19th century instrument would, however, come close to starting over w/ new action, soundpost, bearings, probably hammers – virtually everything on the inside. And what about a soundboard that's over 100 years old? That's part of the "charming" vintage sound, I'd say. But back then, it was fresh and tight.

Any reasonable repair of a 1800s "oldie" cannot be obtained for 2.000 € but would come close to the price of a decent 2nd hand modern piano.

Re: Technical specs for replicating physical piano

@ Gizmao
Yes, this particular Steingraeber is the "opus one", i.e. the very first grand piano made by Steingraeber and, as such, as "untouched" as possible. Besides, it's not as well made as for example Liszt's own Steingraeber. This other old (1873) but more "restored" piano has a much more "modern" sound, and is more in tune, of course, albeit still lower than A=440 Hz (that's really not a problem for me...). I had the privilege to play a few notes myself on this piano in Bayreuth and the sound is much closer to current pianos.

By the way, the problem of ringing after release is a well-known one: in one of his letters, Beethoven himself writes about a piano whose release is better handled than another one (I don't remember the brands right now).

About the 100 years old soundboard... well, talk about this to a violonist with his Guarnerius or Stradivarius... ! :-)

Here is a picture of Liszt's Steingraeber... impressive, really !!!

http://www.dieklaviermachermeister.at/h...hp?lang=en

Re: Technical specs for replicating physical piano

Luc Henrion wrote:

About the 100 years old soundboard... well, talk about this to a violonist with his Guarnerius or Stradivarius... ! :-)

That's different b/c a violin soundboard is much smaller and not so prone to cracks or fissures (it's easier to maintain and protect).

After all, Stradivariuses are still in use today for serious work while pianos of that age group are a curiosity really, mostly played in museums.

And, while I must say I am not a piano technician, I think a piano soundboard is somewhat artificially put under tension (which loosens over time, contributing to the "vintage" sound) to maintain impedance while a violin is stable in itself…

Re: Technical specs for replicating physical piano

Gizmao wrote:
Luc Henrion wrote:

About the 100 years old soundboard... well, talk about this to a violonist with his Guarnerius or Stradivarius... ! :-)

That's different b/c a violin soundboard is much smaller and not so prone to cracks or fissures (it's easier to maintain and protect).

After all, Stradivariuses are still in use today for serious work while pianos of that age group are a curiosity really, mostly played in museums.

And, while I must say I am not a piano technician, I think a piano soundboard is somewhat artificially put under tension (which loosens over time, contributing to the "vintage" sound) to maintain impedance while a violin is stable in itself…

Yes, but did you listen to\see the recording and slideshow at my above link ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNIaUxzI2n4 ) of the Chickering model that is similar in age to that of the original poster (who is doubtless now regretting having posted)?

And remember that he is probably not interested in having the finish redone (one of the largest expenses) and has already bought the new strings (another large expense). I don't know what the costs of installing new pins or replacing the pin block and\or agraffes, or even the hitch pins are in his area. Looking on the Piano World site for about fifteen minutes, I'm guessing anywhere from well under 1K just to have bigger tuning pins installed to 3K for a new pin block and agraffes and hitch pins. Not inexpensive. But worth having a technician look at.

The crown may be gone and the keys need work, but we don't know how much. Sorry to defend an attempt to preserve this instrument. It may come from my memory of paying $175 for a 1940's Gibson archtop guitar in the 1980's and less than a year selling it for the same price because I couldn't get it to sound the way I wanted (like my flattop). I still cringe when I remember letting that guitar get away, and when I see someone about to give up on an instrument, I remember my enormous mistake.

Last edited by Jake Johnson (03-02-2012 21:59)

Re: Technical specs for replicating physical piano

Jake Johnson wrote:

Yes, but did you listen to\see the recording and slideshow at my above link ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNIaUxzI2n4 ) of the Chickering model that is similar in age to that of the original poster

If you mean to endorse restoring old pianos with this recording (in the hope of getting something usable), let me say that this is the very "old piano" sound that I certainly would not spend any money on. Not on the piece of antique furniture and not on the futile attempts to make it a "piano" again.

Sounds like big time damper issues and like it will never be in tune again. And this is an ad of a piano technician, so supposedly the piano is already in top condition (as "top" as it gets).

Last edited by Gizmao (08-02-2012 09:58)

Re: Technical specs for replicating physical piano

Gizmao wrote:
Jake Johnson wrote:

Yes, but did you listen to\see the recording and slideshow at my above link ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNIaUxzI2n4 ) of the Chickering model that is similar in age to that of the original poster

If you mean to endorse restoring old pianos with this recording (in the hope of getting something usable), let me say that this is the very "old piano" sound that I certainly would not spend any money on. Not on the piece of antique furniture and not on the futile attempts to make it a "piano" again.

Sounds like big time damper issues and like it will never be in tune again. And this is an ad of a piano technician, so supposedly the piano is already in top condition (as "top" as it gets).

Ah, well. I love the sound of that recording. Would I put $20,000 into restoring one to that state? Only if I were wealthy. Would I spend $5000 to restore one to that state? Very possibly. Partly because I like the sound and partly out of a desire to preserve what is becoming a rare instrument from a good company.

Although I don't find them all that objectionable, since they add to the sense of "old," I do hear the tuning problems. (Some it may come from unisons just not well tuned, and some of it may come from the lack of stretch. (?) (I don't really know, but wouldn't these pianos force one to use very little, if any, stretch in tuning the octaves?)

Regardless, for me, it would be wonderful to have this sound in a PTeq model. I wonder if editing one of the fortes or the Erard can create something close to it? Anyone?

Last edited by Jake Johnson (10-02-2012 15:05)

Re: Technical specs for replicating physical piano

Jake Johnson wrote:

Regardless, for me, it would be wonderful to have this sound in a PTeq model. I wonder if editing one of the fortes or the Erard can create something close to it? Anyone?

Erard, maybe. After all we got all those parameters like stretch, impedance, damper duration. I just lack a bit of the incentive to try.