Topic: Any C3 midrange tweaks suggestions to add clarity?

Happy new year all! I'm wondering if anyone has experimented with tweaking the midrange of the C3, say between 1.5 octaves below middle C, to the same distance above middle C. This register sounds a bit muddy to me, and seems to lack clarity. Everything I've tried with EQ and hammer hardness adjustments seems to adversely affect other sections of the piano. Are there any suggestions, or has anyone put up an fxp addressing this?

Thanks,
Michael

Re: Any C3 midrange tweaks suggestions to add clarity?

Something I posted about once upon a time may help. Try creating a curve for your pedal in the Pedal pane. Imagine a velocity curve for a synth keyboard that you might create for playing piano, with a fairly deep dip early on to the right.

My FP3 pedal seems to have been sending more pedal than I wanted too easily. The least pressure was creating a lot of resonances, which may be what you're hearing. Maybe not. Let me know if you think the sound is closer to what you want this way.

All of this assumes that you have a half-pedal\continuous pedal.

Last edited by Jake Johnson (02-01-2011 17:07)

Re: Any C3 midrange tweaks suggestions to add clarity?

Michael,

have you tried a third party reverb? I use PSP PianoVerb which I find works really quite well. See what you think with it's various presets. Besr of all, it's free!

http://www.pspaudioware.com/plugins/rev...pianoverb/

Chris

Re: Any C3 midrange tweaks suggestions to add clarity?

Thanks Jake and Chris,

After experimenting with pedal curves and turning off the onboard reverb, it seems that both pedal and reverb are contributing to the lack of clarity, but other factors seem to be at work also. Microphone positioning seems to help too.

Part of the problem may be that one particular song I'm working on spends a lot of time in that register, is slow moving, and has some accented dissonance. So maybe adjusting other paramenters like impedance and sympathetic resonance will help too. That will be trial and error territory, there's a lot to learn.

That pedal velocity adjustment feature, which I never knew about, is great, and I'm really looking forward to trying out Pianoverb. Thanks.

Re: Any C3 midrange tweaks suggestions to add clarity?

Michael, which preset are you using?

Re: Any C3 midrange tweaks suggestions to add clarity?

sigasa wrote:

Michael, which preset are you using?

Chris, I'm using a slightly modified C3 preset. I changed the Stereophonic preset into Sound Recording with 4 mics, moved the mics around, and tweaked the velocity curve a bit, reverb, sound distance.

Re: Any C3 midrange tweaks suggestions to add clarity?

Occurs to me that something else I've been doing is reducing the volume on the PianoTeq interface to about -6, so that the relation between the force I exert and the volume is about the same as though I was playing an older piano or a piano with soft hammers. Sounds obvious, but it makes a big difference in the overall tone. (EDIT: I originally mistyped 0 for the setting.)

With the volume higher, I instead hear too many of the softer partials too distinctly, and the main freqs can get a little lost. If I'm not careful, I'll then play harder, probably trying to drown out the softer freqs, which of course doesn't work. Reducing the overall volume so I have to play harder brings out the clarity of the notes as they would naturally be brought out on a real piano. Let me know what you think. (This is in combination with the curves for the velocity and the curve for the pedal.)

Last edited by Jake Johnson (06-01-2011 23:41)

Re: Any C3 midrange tweaks suggestions to add clarity?

Jake,
I'm puzzled - isn't the default volume in Pianoteq zero anyway? (I can't check at the moment) 

I find that I generally need to use a volume of about minus 5 or 6, because otherwise Pianoteq clips. (I don't use the limiter, so of course when the signal saturates, flat-line clipping occurs, which is very noticeable)


Greg.

Last edited by skip (06-01-2011 23:09)

Re: Any C3 midrange tweaks suggestions to add clarity?

You're right. Sorry--I  meant to say that I set it to -6. I'll correct it above, too.

With the limiter off, though, and using my keyboard set to a heavy action, I think I'd lower it still more, to about -11 or so. The idea being that the sound begins to growl a bit as I play hard enough to consider the sound loud.

Working with the Dynamics slider factors in here, too. Seems as though working with these parameters--the curves, the volume, the limiter, and the dynamics--can do a lot in terms of shaping the sound of the note at a particular loudness level. And then there are the hammers to harden or soften at the three levels. Trying out edits as I type, I'm finding I like having the Piano hammer level a little harder with this arrangement of the limiter off, and all of the above. But of course the various instruments are going to differ a lot in how these settings sound--the Erad just won't respond like the K1 to the same settings.

All in all, though, I would first try working with these basic controls, instead of the more intriguing controls, to get the basic timbre to volume and force right.

What are other people doing?

Last edited by Jake Johnson (07-01-2011 00:40)

Re: Any C3 midrange tweaks suggestions to add clarity?

Interesting.  I've been leaving things at 0 dB mostly and limiter on. My only concern with the approach of not hearing enough volume is that you play differently- sensitive sections of music would have to be played harder, or I suspect so. But it's worth checking out, and it's amazing to me the amount of control that's available in Pianoteq. It's a tweakers paradise, and I've only got the standard edition!

BTW, what's the idea with not using the limiter- wider dynamic range?

Thanks guys.

Michael

Re: Any C3 midrange tweaks suggestions to add clarity?

I don't use the limiter for the simple reason that the limiter distorts the signal.  (to varying degrees, depending on the signal level and the settings of the limiter - one way or another, it's still distortion though) 

Leaving Pianoteq at volume 0, but with the limiter off, produces distortion too - and it's much more noticable and objectionable. The limiter tapers the signal as it approaches 100%, to control this distortion such that it sounds more pleasant.  However, I want to hear a pure, clean, signal, just as if I were playing a real piano. So, I turn the limiter off, and reduce Pianoteq's volume, to eliminate ALL distortion.

Yes, turning off the limiter does increase the dynamic range, strictly speaking, but that's not why I do it. The dynamic range can be controlled with the seperate "dynamics" slider anyway.  (although that doesn't control the dynamic range in exactly the same way as the limiter does)

I am not saying it's "wrong" for Pianoteq to have the limiter on by default - it's just not my preference.

I still listen at a realistically loud level - I simply turn my amp up to compensate.

Greg.

Last edited by skip (07-01-2011 03:14)

Re: Any C3 midrange tweaks suggestions to add clarity?

I agree with Greg, except to say, that I think the limiter should be OFF in default.

No matter the ptq, I always turn the limiter off.  I don't like the distortion.  If I'm rendering something to wave, the volume level can be set very low to avoid clipping, and the result can be amplified (or compressed if applicable) during post processing.


Glenn

__________________________
Procrastination Week has been postponed.  Again.

Re: Any C3 midrange tweaks suggestions to add clarity?

Possibly, the default could be to have it on, but with the volume lower, so that we still have the safety net, but with less limiting/distortion occurring in general.  I think if I was playing at a gig (heaven forbid!), I'd do this.  When I said that having the volume down eliminates ALL distortion, of course I don't know for SURE that I have the volume low enough such that it will still not clip on the odd occasion. 

I guess I like having it off so that any clipping will be obvious to me - it lets me know that my volume is still too high, so that I know that I should reduce the volume further. In a live situation, we don't have this luxury.

I know the level meter goes red when it clips, but I don't constantly monitor that when playing.

Also, when playing it in real time,  we can't necessarily have the volume down VERY low and then amp it back up again, because of the finite amplification and also background hiss of the amps. (for batch rendering, it's fine, yes, although some resolution will inevitably be lost - probably inconsequential when saving in 32-bit resolution though)

Greg.

Last edited by skip (08-01-2011 06:50)