Topic: Pianoteq for President!

Hi friends,

I'll turn 45 already next time but anyhow I really plan to start piano learning yet, starting from the ground. Doesn't matter, a try is the half of a win.
Looking arround for an equipment I found Pianoteq, listened the demos, looked at the hardware requirement and saw the price ...
So there is nothing else for me to say than Modartt for President!

The biggest gold medal would I give you for your really honorful marketing politics! Because: there are many other providers outside, making their standard version so poor as possible, they try hard to force you to buy the pro version or an upgrade because you absolutely can't work with the standard version.
Pianoteq presenting another world: for not more than 100 Euros (!) I can get the full set of these wonderful instruments to play them without any willful restriction, even the basic modifications you can do! Only as a freak, as a human screwdriver you will the play-version feel not enough for you. And ... I'm NOT forced to decide just now what a version I have to buy, because PLAY plus a later upgrade to STANDARD has the same price as the STANDARD itself. Also the same for an upgrade from STANDARD to PRO. So ....
THANK YOU FOR THIS!

If 400 for PRO or 250 for STANDARD or even just 100 Euros for the play-version, there are several stunning concert grands and even several sensational historical instruments included, this is absolutely unique, worldwide no comparable thing to find! No wonder that I say this, beeing a clasics-fan and I really would love it to play also a good harsichord and an old pianoforte. So, as an example, you can play Beethoven on an authentic "Hammerklavier" wich could theoretically have been his own instrument.

I also plan to do-it-yourself a smaller grand piano body from wood or acryle or maybe to "empty" a damaged digital grand and then install a new and better keyboard and the needed parts of a computer in. So I was afraid to need a strong mainboard-cpu-set for sample-libraries and thought how to solve the heat-problem without ventilators. So comes my question: I guess, for Pianoteq's modelling-engine I'll need not more than an Intel Atom dual-core 2 x 1,6 GHz, am I right?? So the piano could work without ventilators and I could install a smaller SSD-drive with no noise and heat and wich is not so expansive, having just arround 30 GB for Windows and Pianoteq.

So next time I'll buy Pianoteq and a keyboard so good as possible, maybe so I still will have to wait for the needed money, the keyboard shouldn't be under the standard of Fatar Numa Nero or Kawai MP5/ MP6, I think.

There is still alot to read for me in the forum, So finally I'm really delighted about Pianoteq and also the website is beautiful - only your java-scripts seem not to work fine to all browsers.

Re: Pianoteq for President!

Multicore CPUs are preferred, the fastest the better. Try not to go below 2 GHz dualcore!


Glad you found your holy grail!

Hard work and guts!

Re: Pianoteq for President!

I wasn't afraid to need that, because I tried even huge sample libraries to play them with a MIDI file and saw just a moderate CPU usage, having a quad core Q-6600 (2 x 2,4 GHz) in my desktop. OK, can be, one need to overdo it for the lowest latenzy playing in high polyphony.

Another question: Pianoteq is offered now to set a lower sampling rate than 44,1 kHz. To make it more modesty to the hardware. Couldn't you offer also the contrary way, for a better sound quality? That means, 48 kHz/ 24 Bit or 96 kHz/ 24 Bit? Could be a setting for users, using an Intel Core I-7 or similar with arround 4 x 3 GHz. I remember you that music-freaks complain about digitizing with 44,1/16 since the compact disk has released in 1982. So also some piano sampling packages are offered in 96/24.

Re: Pianoteq for President!

Yeah, you can choose up to 192k sample rate.

Hard work and guts!

Re: Pianoteq for President!

EvilDragon wrote:

Yeah, you can choose up to 192k sample rate.

Isn't that just the case with PTQ Standard or Pro, though?

Re: Pianoteq for President!

Pro version only for 192K I think..

Can anyone who has the pro version tell the difference in sample rates between 192K and 48K or less? Audible difference I mean?

Perhaps post some short samples for comparison (if no one has already)?