Hi Tony,
Here is my temperament method as promised:
In my piano note designation, I will call the lowest A on the piano A1 so that A440 is A5 (the 5th A from the bottom). Sorry if this naming method does not match yours, but I don't really have the 88 key numbers on a chart in front of me to be absolutely sure of what key I'm talking about.
When I get into beat rates, I have come up with a seemingly novel method for timing them. I looked at how many beats per second they are supposed to beat, multiplied that number by 60 to get beats per minute, then divided by 4. Why 4? Because that number gives me a metronome marking that is 4 times too slow, and when I multiply 4 beats per tick, I get 16th notes. So lets take A4 (A below middle C) and figure out F3 a major third below it. The Reblitz book says these intervals beat about 6.93 times a second. That number is not very useful, so we take 6.93 and multiply it by 60, giving us 415.8 beats per minute. That is also not a useful number, so lets make each beat a sixteenth note by dividing by 4. 415.8 divided by 4 is 103.95 on the metronome (which is practically 104 on the metronome). Dial your metronome to 104 and say "1 ee and ah 2 ee and ah (and so on) and you can accurately and musically time the beat rates! Make the F-A interval beat like 16th notes at this 104 tempo and you have 6.93 beats a second. The F-A will sound great!
If you haven't already done so, invest in a cheap electronic metronome - it will help at least get the initial notes (F3,A#4,D4) close enough to use for the rest of the tuning.
Here are my D-D temperament steps:
1) So, as you know, A5 is tuned to A440 using F2 (second F from the bottom) as a reference beat.
2) Tune A4 to A5 (Octave down) to a beatless octave.
Test F2-A4 against F2-A5 - they should beat about the same
3) Tune F3 to A4 (Major 3rd down) 4 beats per tick at M.M. (Metronome Marking)104
4) Tune D4 to F3 (Major 6th up) 4 beats per tick at M.M. 119
Test A4-D4 (Perfect 4th) should "roll" slowly because it is a little wide.
Test D4-A5 (Perfect 5th) should roll even slower because it is just a little narrow.
5) Tune A#4 to D4 (Major 3rd down) 4 beats per tick at M.M. 139
(This is the fastest interval to hear in my temperament. It took me some practice to get this interval close at this fast tempo - just get it pretty close so you can do this test):
Test F3-A#4(perfect 4th) should roll slowly because it is a little wide.
6) Tune F#3 to A#4 (major 3rd down) to beat a little faster than F3-A4 is. At this point you can do everything relatively, but I will give you the metronome tempos in case you need help in developing your ear for how fast it should be). So, 4 beats per tick at M.M. 110 (remember F-A was 4 beats per tick at M.M. 104) - now you get the idea of how much faster we're talking about.
Test F#3-A4 (minor 3rd) this should beat really fast - faster than anything we have heard so far)
7) Tune D3 to D4 (Perfect octave down) beatless. Even though we haven't tuned A#3 yet, Make sure to Test A#3-D3(Major 3rd) against A#3-D4 (Major 10th). They should beat the same.
You will now have created a Major 3rd between the D3 you just tuned and the F#3 you tuned in step 6. This will be the slowest beating Major 3rd we will use. Now test D3-A4 (perfect 5th) and it should roll very slowly because it is just a little narrow. Lastly, D3-F3(minor third) will beat the same as F3-D4(Major 6th) - pretty cool!
8) Tune B4 to D3 (Major 6th up) to be slower than the Major 6th of F3-D4.
If you need a reference tempo, it is 4 beats per tick at M.M. 100.
Test F#3-B4 (perfect 4th) should roll slowly because it is a little wide.
To Be Continued...
I'm sorry but I need to put the rest in my next post. I've run out of time. Please try these steps out and see if you can get them sounding acceptable (using the metronome past step 6 if you need help). This method uses tuning 3rds, 6ths, and octaves only - no 4ths and 5ths. The 4ths and 5ths are just checked along the way. In all methods I've previously seen, there is a 4th or 5th to tune, and it has to be like 1 beat per 4 seconds or something - too slow to use accurately and too hard to judge in my opinion. That's why I chose the faster, easier-to-hear intervals for my method.
Good luck - part 2 coming soon!
-Erich