Topic: 'ave ya' seen this?

http://www.behringer.com/EN/Products/EG8280USB.aspx
http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/4443/eg8280usbp0a35frontweb.png

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Re: 'ave ya' seen this?

So, it's completely modeled? If it is, then it's second hardware device after V-piano and I think it's not going to be the last one... I allready have kind sampled-modeled-hybrid piano in my Roland 700GX (Supernatural Expansion) and I think new Yamahas are also using their hybrid technology. Clavia is putting String Resonance to their Nord Piano and same is with new Ivory update. So competition is getting really hard...

I didn't see any audio samples of this Behringer grand...

Re: 'ave ya' seen this?

Ugly front lid !!!

Tell me folks, how many years we heard this same old talking ???

---" Thanks to our RSM (Real Sound Modeling) engine, EUROGRAND instruments sound just like a real acoustic grand...  " ---

  From almost 10 years ago manufactures says their idigital instrument sounds like a real acoustic grand piano.  But no digital piano had ever get that, even V-piano.

For only  2649 USD , a low price for a digital Baby Grand that would use a inovative sound generation...    I bet it just another ordinary digital piano with a simple modelled sympathetic ressonance.

I'm afraid the word "modelled" will became a fashion, and many products will use that just because they model a very tiny aspect of that in some place, even than use sampling for most.

  It wil  be like the word  "diet"  or "light" or "low sugar" in food products.

Last edited by Beto-Music (03-05-2010 19:19)

Re: 'ave ya' seen this?

Ecaroh wrote:

If it is, then it's second hardware device after V-piano and I think it's not going to be the last one...

I've already compared V-piano against Yamaha CP1 at my local music store so it can only become the third....

http://de.yamaha.com/de/products/musica...e=overview

Last edited by azrael4 (03-05-2010 21:10)

Re: 'ave ya' seen this?

I think the Behringer thing is just an old-fashioned sample player.  Nothing in their manual or on their site about modelling, although they toss the word in. Modelling, here, probably means a low pass filter. They don't say how many velocity layers are used.  Like Beto-Music says, the word "modelled" will become a fashion, without regard to its meaning.

Not so sure about the Yamaha. They say they're using samples and modelling, but they're very vague about their methods (marketing-talk). The instrument seems to offer no control over whatever might be modelled and no software editor is listed on their download site. Their modelling may mean adding some high freq sine tones to low strike samples and including extra sounds for dampering.

Last edited by Jake Johnson (04-05-2010 01:09)

Re: 'ave ya' seen this?

Well they say "real sound modeling"  - RSM - (isn't that special).

But they really don't say what it is.

My guess is that if they don't brag about physical modeling in real time (because that is the latest technology), then they aren't physically modeling the sound.  Or perhaps like TruePianos, they really use samples, intensively tweak them, and "kind of allude to maybe it's modeling".

Something is missing - where is the interface (a la Pianoteq) where the sounds can be tweaked.  At least the V-Piano offers that.

As you can see, I'm a bit skeptical (my skepticism tends to keep me from believing impossible claims).

Glenn

Last edited by Glenn NK (03-05-2010 21:59)
__________________________
Procrastination Week has been postponed.  Again.

Re: 'ave ya' seen this?

If any special filter combined with sampler can be called modelle piano... my Roland F-90 could be a modelled digital piano, cause have a good repedaling function, while simple sampler piano libraries didn't had it.

So, like a said, the fashion of modelling is coming...  Let's use this funny word in everything around...  Háaa háaa háaaaa...
Sarcasm !

I think Modartt should change some things, like start to claim pianoteq as Truly Fully Modelled, and not just modelled.  Just to make justice.


Yamaha CP1 is sampled instrument, with few "modelling" things.


Remamber one thing, in marketing the weaker things are never spoken, while some exclusive charasteristics are usually over spoken.
So if a digital piano just appear to say a little that is modelled, in a time true modelled it's a a very rare thing, so surely is not, cause if was they would speak  in all directions over and over.

Last edited by Beto-Music (03-05-2010 22:22)

Re: 'ave ya' seen this?

It's 64-note polyphony is a bit low by today's standards. Depending on how well it does note stealing, it could be an issue when using the sustain pedal and/or when layering multiple instruments.

And yes, I too get the impression it's a pretty standard type of sampled digital piano.

Greg.

Re: 'ave ya' seen this?

"Max. 64-note polyphony" -- 64-NOTE POLYPHONY?!?!?!?

In THIS day and age?????!?

I can't even get all of the keys to sound at the same time???

Plus, the dang thing's 150 lbs. (almost 200 if you get the "fake grand" version), and you'd probably have to get a "real amp" or two (80W speakers for a piano -- are you JOKING???!).  If I want to break my back, then I'll get a real piano, thank you very much...

(I'd sure as heck rather spend the MSRP of US$2649.99 on a real piano, anyway -- or, better yet, a new computer!!!)

Oh, but it has THREE pedals -- goodness bless 'em, I was all wrong, I'll buy one immediately!!!

(Sorry, just had to get that out of my system.)

"Our developers, who art in Toulouse, hallowed be thy physical-models.
Thy version 4 come, thy new instruments be done, in the computer as it is in the wood!"

Re: 'ave ya' seen this?

What do you think it would sound like running pianoteq through it's own underlid speaker(s)?

Re: 'ave ya' seen this?

As a house sound engineer in Karlsruhe one dryly told me, "Behringer: German for 'cheap crap'."

Re: 'ave ya' seen this?

Little bit funny to read these comments because everybody here seems to have chosen a very negative attitude towards this machine, before it's even released. Yes, I know Behringer carries this label Feline described, but is it fair to judge their new products without hearing or testing them? On the other hand I know that there are some people on professional level using some of their products because they think those have good price/quality relationship. In other words they aren't overpriced like many "good old" manufacturers. 

I don't own any Behringer myself, so I don't have any personal reason to defend them. Still I try be little bit more open to anything new.

I can see these kind of fanatic attitudes all the time like "ALL the Rolands are -" or "I don't ever play any virtual analog". Perhaps on this forum there are some people who refuse to see or hear any negativity or problematic in Pianoteq sound....?

Last edited by Ecaroh (04-05-2010 12:43)

Re: 'ave ya' seen this?

I've owned a small Behringer mixer that was very good. But the ads for this keyboard mention modelling, which it clearly doesn't use, once you read the manual for the keyboard, and neither the ad nor the manual give details about the samples. And it's fairly expensive. All of that is what's causing the ire.

And there's probably some residual ire at the many companies that are doing similar things, using old technology while creating instruments that are far behind the Ensoniqs, say, of twenty years ago, but claiming they are advanced.

Last edited by Jake Johnson (04-05-2010 14:51)

Re: 'ave ya' seen this?

I own a behringer Hum Destroyer - works a treat! In fact, it's the second one I bought as I gave the first one away! I've had no problems with them! That doesn't mean to say that all their products must therefore be good! But my experience with the above mentioned product led me to believe that Behringer were a good product manufacturer?

I would not even think of using the built in sounds of this behringer, but it would make a good speaker and controller if indeed the keyboard and amplifier are up to par! Also makes a nice piece of furniture (don't read doorstop!)

Re: 'ave ya' seen this?

Ecaroh wrote:

Little bit funny to read these comments because everybody here seems to have chosen a very negative attitude towards this machine, before it's even released.

In all fairness, I have to mention that several points (which I noted before) essentially guarantee that this thing invites (read:  deserves) the negative attitude.  I'm certainly not commenting on the preset sounds (though I wouldn't hold high hopes for them), but come on:  this thing's obviously a bit of a half-@$$#D product.

I had a Behringer keyboard amp for my Kawai, and -- believe me -- it was nothing special.  I only bought it because it came at a special low, low price with the keyboard -- the "special" price should have been the overly-optimistic MSRP, quite frankly...

Hey, I'm all in favour of good competition -- but while Pianoteq may have some "shortcomings" (i.e., it's still not a real piano, which I can easily manage), it still rules the roost -- IMHumO.

This Behringer Beast seems like a rather expensive piece of furniture (read:  doorstop -- HA!) more than anything which could even remotely compare to my setup.

Last edited by dhalfen (04-05-2010 20:33)
"Our developers, who art in Toulouse, hallowed be thy physical-models.
Thy version 4 come, thy new instruments be done, in the computer as it is in the wood!"

Re: 'ave ya' seen this?

Jake Johnson wrote:

And there's probably some residual ire at the many companies that are doing similar things, using old technology while creating instruments that are far behind the Ensoniqs, say, of twenty years ago, but claiming they are advanced.

Jake:

There is quite a bit of residual ire (well put) and apparently it's ongoing and not just because of Behringer.  And it keeps on - just go into a DP store for an earful of "stuff".

Real Sound Modeling aka RSM so that it sound technical.  What I hear is RBS.

Glenn

Last edited by Glenn NK (04-05-2010 22:43)
__________________________
Procrastination Week has been postponed.  Again.