Oh, as a card-carrying Novus fan I feel I should put my view forward. I ended up getting a Novus 10s even though I started with the plan to get an acoustic baby grand (via the interim idea of a grand + atx).
Pros of the pure (novus) route
1. Takes less space - which means that there remains room, hypothetically, for a dedicated grand at some point in the future
2. I found that the price to value for pure acoustics is generally much better than ones with silent systems fitted - I felt I would have to make too many compromises/have limited options on the acoustic side
3. At the time I was worried that the soundboard-transducer system would colour the sounds that aren't coming from a built-in source (though now I appreciate room correction would have solved this)
4. Novus speakers have generally better bass performance than transducers (which go a bit thin in the bass section... not hugely but enough for me to let it be a factor
5. Novus uses the Neotex key surfaces which I vastly prefer over the Acryl/Phenol keys of the GL-10
6. I really don't rate the GL-10 highly as an instrument
7. Electronics have different lifecycles to acoustic components, and an item that is subject to both feels like the worst of both worlds, from a maintenance pov
Pros of the hybrid route
1. You get a grand piano, which is good for the soul
2. The acoustic sound production is the perfect calibration tool for volume and velocity response when dealing with virtual instruments
3. The big advantage of transducers is that their sound production is more distributed than point speakers - this means a more natural acoustic integration, with less booms and standing waves
The choice has evolved a bit since. the new NV12 uses transducers for sound production which should even out the sound a bit - but obviously the sound board is smaller than on a grand, so it may end up more gimmick than genuine benefit.
I'm very happy with my choice, so can recommend the NV10/12 route; I would advise against the GL-10 with Aures but the GX-2 with Aures is neat; although maybe a bit on the expensive side for what it is as an acoustic (by which I mean, it's a very fine instrument but you'd likely find even better options in the same price range)
---
Edit: Since I buried the lead in my ramblings a bit, let me add: Ultimately, I noticed that a new GX2 without Aures is £10k cheaper than the model with an Aures, and I was able to find a novus for less than £10k, so the maths in my head was that in the end game, a Novus + a pure acoustic is the better value proposition. That said, I'd argue that the GX2 is the better option for people who (1) really like the GX2 as an acoustic instrument and would choose this as their grand piano anyway, and (2) spend a significant part of their time playing it as an acoustic (more than 40% of the time) - in contrast I saw myself as a mostly-digital user (for late-night practice).
So the way I would decide is to evaluate the GX2 on its own acoustic merits and, if it's a clear winner, go with that - but if you want to keep your options open, go with the Novus
Last edited by daniel_r328 (Today 09:43)