Keyboard controller for Pianoteq and music production

It is worth being cynical about targeted pricing. Companies aren't only benevolent suppliers of hardware, they also price similar products to different price points depending on on what they think that particular part of the market will tolerate.

Thanks for informing us that FP-10 has the same mechanism as the A88 mkii.  Actually I think I might have heard this before and forgot it!
We were discussing the a88 Mark ii in another thread. People are always looking for the next step up. Or an affordable new piano when theirs starts to get worn out.

I believe the market for digital pianos vs high end hammer action MIDI controllers is much much bigger, so we have to consider economies of scale, and serious competition. The drive units, amplification and DSP chipset are relatively cheap components in a digital piano (to the manufacturer).
I'm thinking PCB surface mount component filled boards and drive units that cost pence rather than pounds to the manufacturer (or buy in) at that scale, and no I'm not joking, the labour fitting them will be the most expensive part of the equation, along with storage and shipping. 

Even so if you want in the future to order any replacement parts or get an engineer to repair it for you you'll find yourself paying hundreds of pounds most likely.

Owing to the economies of scale and the sales model and competition I would expect most digital pianos to have much tighter margins. So it's not as simple as you were thinking.

A88 mkii has MIDI 2.0 if that's of interest?

Have you ever used an acoustic piano?

Are you talking about fast trilling on a single key?

So far as I can ascertain from the information on this forum generally speaking if you want the nice graded hammer action keyboard then fast trilling on a single note is more the preserve of the most expensive options, which does seem too expensive; there is a hole in the market I believe built around complacency about the upgrade path. A Chinese manufacturer may come along and plug it if the main players aren't careful. I am surprised there aren't more engineers trying to crack that one.

Fast trilling seems to be beyond even the high quality option that you have picked.

Otherwise you might be talking about latency issues - or a combination.

The quietness is another concern. That sounds like a technical issue. That said there might possibly be a technique issue- hammer action requires a bit more oomph. Ultimately this also gives it greater usable range than synth or semi-weighted action.

What happens when you use other piano VSTs?
Same again?

Also I suppose there's a possibility that there is a volume control on the keyboard telling pianoteq to turn the volume down.
I suggest reading the manual troubleshooting thoroughly.

Yes, he should check the drivers. Along with the volume control. He may have to produce custom velocity curves of course. There is always the possibility he's got a faulty unit too.

Indeed.  Economies of scale in favour of digital pianos and the general lack of competition amongst graded hammer action MIDI controllers.

As we can see from the video done at Woody's piano shack the build quality of the A88 mkii is a grade or two above the entry-level pianos with the same action, but I know where my money would go, unless I was a touring musician I would take the cheaper plastics and just handle a cheaper digital piano a bit more carefully - then again it wouldn't get moved about much anyway.

There is a pride of ownership in owning nicely made things though. That shouldn't be underestimated. Better quality finish and solid build counts for a lot - when you've got the option to afford it.

MIDI 2.0 high resolution midi hmm, I'm not convinced high resolution would be perceptible in blind testing.  The results of an improved mechanical key action on the other hand, including the fine resolution of light sensors (on other keyboards) could make all the difference, but 127 steps on a single piano key mechanism is already capable of differentiating miniscule velocity differences of a fraction of a decimal (which we can't even perceive), even with lossy velocity curves taken into account.
Add to that the blurring of the margins by playing many notes together.
That said it's one of those things that I think it would be nice to have just to say this is the 21st century, the keyboard can do it anyway.

In a nutshell I believe the qualitative difference is almost certainly entirely in the electromechanical realm not digital resolution.

When I play music, say in iTunes, at a loud volume, the same volume level is not nearly loud enough for Pianoteq, or other VST's.

But the keyboard is posting correct velocities - it has no problem reaching 127/127 in Pocket Midi monitor, or Pianoteq monitor.

--

As for the A-88, if I do replace it with something else, then what would you recommend for around 1360 USD ? It could be a digital piano. I just want something with build quality and good keybed, and without gimmicks.

Unfortunately the VPC1 is nearly 2000 USD new here haha. I think it's out of the question.

I was considering the VPC1 for use with PTQ, but this thread -- https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=6886 -- gave me some doubts.

Do you think the FP10 / FP30x would be OK with regard to the issues discussed there?