Topic: Stu Harrison from Merriam Pianos reviews PTQ 6 vs. 7

For some time Stu has been hinting that he'll review Pianoteq. Finally his review is here!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_ON_-i3r-k

Re: Stu Harrison from Merriam Pianos reviews PTQ 6 vs. 7

studiosnch wrote:

For some time Stu has been hinting that he'll review Pianoteq. Finally his review is here!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_ON_-i3r-k

Great, thanks. Love that reviewer.

Pianoteq Pro Studio with Bösendorfer, Shigeru Kawai and Organteq

Re: Stu Harrison from Merriam Pianos reviews PTQ 6 vs. 7

Also Simeon Amburgey
Modartt Pianoteq 7 | PETROF 284 Mistral | Flashback
https://youtu.be/1ZIR_m44IS4

It's interesting how he said the phyical modeling is achieved. Does it mean that any recorded sound could be converted into algorithms?

Version 7.3.0 has a different tone (or shape to the sound) than 7.2.3. I like it.

Re: Stu Harrison from Merriam Pianos reviews PTQ 6 vs. 7

DonSmith wrote:

It's interesting how he said the physical modeling is achieved. Does it mean that any recorded sound could be converted into algorithms?

as far as i know (and i could be wrong because definitely i'm not privy to the details) the piano model is at bottom an applied math model based on the physics of sound production of a piano.  i mean, the underlying model is that of a large collection of vibrating strings coupled to the vibrations of the soundboard and lots of other stuff (like acoustics of the piano cavity).  there are various papers online from people who have developed similar such models.  so any instrument that produces sound by a similar process might be a candidate for a variation on the model (like various tuned percussion, such as bells, xylophone, steel drums, and things like harps and guitars).  but there are plenty of other ways to make sound, and many of them are pretty distant from this kind of model. so i would say that if one wants to go as far as "any recorded sound" then there would have to be some new techniques involved. 

that said, there has been work in training neural nets to generate sounds based on various reference sets.  this is a totally different kind of model, though.  i assume Modartt uses some techniques from machine learning in developing their own models, simply because such things are quite the rage in applied math these days, but i don't know if they do or not.

Re: Stu Harrison from Merriam Pianos reviews PTQ 6 vs. 7

Fleer wrote:
studiosnch wrote:

For some time Stu has been hinting that he'll review Pianoteq. Finally his review is here!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_ON_-i3r-k

Great, thanks. Love that reviewer.

Another great one here:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jn6C8u5aJ20

Pianoteq Pro Studio with Bösendorfer, Shigeru Kawai and Organteq

Re: Stu Harrison from Merriam Pianos reviews PTQ 6 vs. 7

DonSmith wrote:

Also Simeon Amburgey
Modartt Pianoteq 7 | PETROF 284 Mistral | Flashback
https://youtu.be/1ZIR_m44IS4

I keep in touch with Simeon in the comments, and we both agree that the Mistral is the best preset that came out from Toulouse so far.

Of course, I'm excited for more to come!