tmyoung wrote:I'd be curious to know ...
<...>
Do other pianos--especially sampled ones--have a better level of tuning accuracy than PTQ?
Please note: I am here only to report my real-life experience with poorly tuned sampled pianos. This is not intended as standing on a soapbox to bash sampled piano libraries as a whole.
Long Answer:
One of the many reasons I permanently deleted all sampled high-end piano libraries (including but not limited to EWQL, Garritan, Synthogy, Dan Dean, Native Instruments, etc.) from my computer had to do with poor intonation in the commercially released versions. Certain velocity ranges of individual notes -- and not always the same notes -- exhibited such poor mis-tuned trichords (clearly audible by ear) that I could not understand how a commercial product was allowed to be released to the public with these tuning flaws.
In retrospect, when a software developer samples a piano in multiple velocity layers, it is inevitable that some combinations of notes and velocities will have gone out of tune, especially in slipping of individual trichords.
I distinctly recall speaking in person with the actual creator of a very-well recognized sample library at the 2009 Winter NAMM show, asking how such a product could be released with so many tuning defects in each brand of piano they had sampled. His paraphrased reply went something like this: "Well, we did re-tune the piano twice a day while sampling it." My conjecture is that the sampling process was somehow automated, with up to eighteen velocity layers per note sampled. During this time, it would be easy for at least some of the note-velocity combinations to be sampled without anyone actually listening to them. Then upon beta testing, with so many notes and so many velocity layers, I can understand how some mis-tuned note-velocity combinations might slip through their quality control process, although there's still no excuse for these flaws to exist after extensive beta testing.
The way I used to work with sampled piano libraries would be to play a given piece, live, while recording a backup copy to midi, and then reviewing the midi file afterward in a DAW (usually Digital Performer Version 5 or Logic Pro Version 6 at the time). Whenever I would find notes that sounded distinctly out-of-tune, I had to manually find the note in the DAW, and modify the note-on velocity to fire the next nearest same-note sample that was not still out of tune.
When I acquired Pianoteq version 3 in the first decade of the twenty first century, I felt terrifically relieved in NOT having to edit specific note-on velocities that happened to otherwise trip out-of-tune samples.
Short answer:
Other pianos, including sampled pianos, do NOT have a better level of tuning accuracy than Pianoteq.
Cheers,
Joe
Last edited by jcfelice88keys (21-01-2020 20:09)