Topic by Beto-Music

  • Avatar
  • Beto-Music
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 02-05-2007
  • Posts: 2,783

Topic: What about back a bit to stoneage?

Not a request, just to think about and see what people have to say:

What about recreate the famous old syntethiser from the 80's  and early 90's?

I know many are available by some emulation softwares out there, but they are not ajustable as pianoteq would allow.

I presume they are very easy to be recreated by pianoteq, as they original principal was very simple algorithms compared to today standarts. The many ways pianoteq have to adjust and change sound would make them better than ever.

Well... Just a idea...

Reply by EvilDragon

  • Avatar
  • EvilDragon
  • Member
  • Offline
  • From: Croatia
  • Registered: 27-06-2008
  • Posts: 3,994

Re: What about back a bit to stoneage?

Which famous synthesizer are you referring to?

Hard work and guts!

Reply by skip

  • Avatar
  • skip
  • Member
  • Offline
  • From: Sydney, Australia
  • Registered: 21-12-2007
  • Posts: 1,059

Re: What about back a bit to stoneage?

I'm not intimately familiar with software emulations of synthesizers, however I do know that some of the existing software emulations are very VERY "adjustable"! Just what kind of adjustability are you referring to? (and which software products have you tried?)  Have you had a look at the Arturia Modular V, for example?

Greg.

Reply by Beto-Music

  • Avatar
  • Beto-Music
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 02-05-2007
  • Posts: 2,783

Re: What about back a bit to stoneage?

I don't know about names, brands, just remamber some musics played in 80's films.

It was a idea, I didn't tested any of theses, just heard about, some people commented.

It they are already ver adjustable the idea of bring to pianoteq falls..

Reply by skip

  • Avatar
  • skip
  • Member
  • Offline
  • From: Sydney, Australia
  • Registered: 21-12-2007
  • Posts: 1,059

Re: What about back a bit to stoneage?

Ok fair enough. I guess there's always room for improvement, but intuitively  it seems like a huge shift in direction for Modarrt to me, because I think that the physics of synthesizers is very different to pianos. ;^) 

Greg.

Reply by Beto-Music

  • Avatar
  • Beto-Music
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 02-05-2007
  • Posts: 2,783

Re: What about back a bit to stoneage?

Of course pianoteq ajusts would kick any other.
But it need to have market, and it many are already avalable by other softwares, and with reasonanble adjust, the public interest is reduced for a new product.


skip wrote:

Ok fair enough. I guess there's always room for improvement, but intuitively it seems like a huge shift in direction for Modarrt to me, because I think that the physics of synthesizers is very different to pianos. ;^) Greg.