Topic: Research: Speed of Sound in Pianoteq 9 Has Wrong Default Values

Speed of Sound in Piano Physical Modeling: A Technical Analysis

I've been researching the speed of sound values used in piano physical modeling and wanted to share my findings. This isn't a criticism of Modartt's excellent work, rather, it's an exploration of how we might achieve even more realistic results.


The Issue

Pianoteq's Steinway D presets use speed of sound values ranging from 320–350 m/s. However, when we examine the actual environmental conditions recommended by piano manufacturers for optimal instrument care, a different picture emerges.


What Piano Manufacturers Recommend

I went directly to the source, the major piano manufacturers themselves:

Manufacturer         Temperature       Humidity                Source
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Steinway & Sons      20°C (68°F)       45–70% RH               steinway.co.uk
Kawai                —                 45% ideal (35–70%)      kawai-global.com
C. Bechstein         —                 40–60% RH               bechstein.com
Yamaha               —                 45% optimal (35–55%)    hub.yamaha.com
Fazioli              —                 30–70% RH               fazioli.com
Bösendorfer          —                 40–60% RH               key-notes.com

Sources:

Additionally, ASHRAE standards for concert venues specify 21°C with humidity ≤65%.


The Physics: Calculated Speed of Sound

Formula: Cramer (1993) (JASA Vol. 93, p. 2510) with Davis (1992) saturation vapor pressure (the scientific standard, as referenced by the UK National Physical Laboratory) at 1 atmosphere:

Condition                                          Speed of Sound
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
20°C, 45% RH (Steinway/Kawai/Yamaha optimal)       343.924 m/s
20°C, 50% RH                                       343.986 m/s
20°C, 60% RH (Bechstein mid-range)                 344.112 m/s
20°C, 70% RH (Steinway max)                        344.237 m/s
21°C, 65% RH (ASHRAE concert hall)                 344.812 m/s

The Takeaway

Based on manufacturer recommendations and concert hall standards, the realistic speed of sound for a well-maintained piano falls between approximately 343.92–344.81 m/s.

Since Pianoteq doesn't support decimal values, 344 m/s would be the most accurate default for standard Steinway conditions (20°C at ~45% RH). For reference, 320 m/s corresponds to approximately −20°C, conditions no piano would ever be played in.


Acoustic Effects in Piano Physical Modeling

1. Resonance Timing

  • At 340 m/s, resonances are approximately 1.18% slower

  • This makes the instrument sound slightly larger

2. Wavelength (at A4 = 440 Hz)

  • At 340 m/s: 77.27 cm

  • At 344 m/s: 78.18 cm

3. Perceived Tonal Differences

340 m/s (lower)

  • Slightly darker tone

  • Longer sustain / resonance decay

  • Bass feels "bigger" or "warmer"

  • Less brightness in upper harmonics

344 m/s (correct)

  • Brighter, more accurate tone

  • Proper harmonic relationships

  • More realistic attack transients

  • Better defined note separation


━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Bonus: Concert Hall Reverb Settings

Here are some effect settings inspired by venues like Wigmore Hall:

Delay (Early Reflections)

Parameter          Value         Rationale
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Mix                18%           Maintains C80 Clarity Index of 0 to +2 dB (optimal 
                                 for piano). Higher values mask transient attack;
                                 lower values lose spatial dimension.

Delay Time         17 ms         Matches the Initial Time Delay Gap (ITDG) of
                                 world-class piano halls (15–20 ms). Boston 
                                 Symphony Hall achieves ~15 ms. This timing creates
                                 intimacy without coloring the direct sound.

Feedback           15%           Generates 2–3 natural reflection clusters before
                                 the reverb tail engages. Higher feedback causes
                                 flutter echo; lower values sound artificially dry.

Tone               0             Neutral preserves the piano's full spectrum
                                 (27.5 Hz–4,186 Hz) without artificial coloration.

Mode               +/−           Stereo mode simulates lateral wall reflections
                                 arriving 25–90° off-axis—critical for spatial
                                 envelopment. Ping-pong sounds artificial for
                                 classical acoustics.

Reverb (Tail) — Concert Hall

Parameter          Value         Rationale
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Mix                −4.5 dB       Keeps reverb subordinate to direct signal,
                                 preserving piano's percussive attack. Concert
                                 recordings typically use −6 to −3 dB wet signal.

Duration           1.60 s        RT60 optimized specifically for solo piano.
                                 Wigmore Hall measures ~1.5 s. Piano requires
                                 0.3–0.6 s shorter RT60 than orchestral music
                                 to maintain articulation in rapid passages.

Tone               0             Flat response respects the instrument's natural
                                 timbre across all registers.

Low Cut            60 Hz         Preserves musical bass (Bass Ratio 1.1–1.3) while
                                 filtering sub-bass rumble. Piano's A0 = 27.5 Hz,
                                 but fundamentals below 60 Hz add mud in reverb
                                 tails without musical benefit.

Early Reflections  −9 dB         Reduced because external delay handles ER
                                 simulation. Prevents comb filtering and phase
                                 issues from doubled early reflections.

Room Size          28 m          Corresponds to optimal hall length for 750 seats
                                 (research indicates 25–32 m range). Sets correct
                                 modal spacing and diffusion density for piano.

Pre-delay          0.035 s       Creates 52 ms total gap from direct sound
                                 (17 ms delay + 35 ms pre-delay), separating
                                 the reverb tail from early reflections. This
                                 preserves the Haas effect for localization
                                 while adding depth.

Design Notes:
These settings aim to recreate the intimate, clear, yet warm sound of world-class piano recital halls. The key technique is using a short delay before the reverb to simulate early reflections off walls.

Why This Combination Works

The delay→reverb chain mimics real concert hall physics: sound reaches your ears directly, then bounces off nearby walls (early reflections at 15–50 ms), and finally builds into diffuse reverberation. Most plugins combine these stages internally, but separating them gives precise control over the ITDG, the single most important factor distinguishing intimate halls from cavernous ones.

These values are derived from acoustic measurements of Wigmore Hall, Pierre Boulez Saal, and similar venues optimized for solo piano, not generic "large hall" presets designed for full orchestra.

Why these values?

  • Concert halls designed for piano feature shorter reverb times (1.4–1.8 s) compared to orchestral halls; excessive tail causes fast passages to become muddy.

  • The 17 ms delay mimics sound bouncing off side walls in a ~750-seat hall, providing spatial depth without sacrificing note definition.

  • A subtle reverb mix (−4.5 dB) ensures clarity over wash.

Genre Suggestions:

Genre              Duration       Mix
──────────────────────────────────────────
Baroque            1.3 s          −6 dB      (drier)
Romantic           1.8 s          −3.5 dB    (wetter)

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

References:

  • Cramer, O. (1993). The variation of the specific heat ratio and the speed of sound in air with temperature, pressure, humidity, and CO₂ concentration. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 93(5), 2510–2516.

  • Davis, R.S. (1992). Equation for the determination of the density of moist air. Metrologia, 29, 67–70.

Last edited by Lemuel (29-12-2025 15:46)

Re: Research: Speed of Sound in Pianoteq 9 Has Wrong Default Values

Lemuel wrote:

Speed of Sound in Piano Physical Modeling: A Technical Analysis

I've been researching the speed of sound values used in piano physical modeling and wanted to share my findings. This isn't a criticism of Modartt's excellent work, rather, it's an exploration of how we might achieve even more realistic results.


The Issue

Pianoteq's Steinway D presets use speed of sound values ranging from 320–350 m/s. However, when we examine the actual environmental conditions recommended by piano manufacturers for optimal instrument care, a different picture emerges.


What Piano Manufacturers Recommend

I went directly to the source, the major piano manufacturers themselves:

Manufacturer         Temperature       Humidity                Source
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Steinway & Sons      20°C (68°F)       45–70% RH               steinway.co.uk
Kawai                —                 45% ideal (35–70%)      kawai-global.com
C. Bechstein         —                 40–60% RH               bechstein.com
Yamaha               —                 45% optimal (35–55%)    hub.yamaha.com
Fazioli              —                 30–70% RH               fazioli.com
Bösendorfer          —                 40–60% RH               key-notes.com

Sources:

Additionally, ASHRAE standards for concert venues specify 21°C with humidity ≤65%.


The Physics: Calculated Speed of Sound

Formula: Cramer (1993) (JASA Vol. 93, p. 2510) with Davis (1992) saturation vapor pressure (the scientific standard, as referenced by the UK National Physical Laboratory) at 1 atmosphere:

Condition                                          Speed of Sound
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
20°C, 45% RH (Steinway/Kawai/Yamaha optimal)       343.92 m/s
20°C, 50% RH                                       343.99 m/s
20°C, 60% RH (Bechstein mid-range)                 344.11 m/s
20°C, 70% RH (Steinway max)                        344.24 m/s
21°C, 65% RH (ASHRAE concert hall)                 344.81 m/s

The Takeaway

Based on manufacturer recommendations and concert hall standards, the realistic speed of sound for a well-maintained piano falls between approximately 343.92–344.81 m/s.

Since Pianoteq doesn't support decimal values, 344 m/s would be the most accurate default for standard Steinway conditions (20°C at ~45% RH). For reference, 320 m/s corresponds to approximately −20°C, conditions no piano would ever be played in.


Acoustic Effects in Piano Physical Modeling

1. Resonance Timing

  • At 340 m/s, resonances are approximately 1.18% slower

  • This makes the instrument sound slightly larger

2. Wavelength (at A4 = 440 Hz)

  • At 340 m/s: 77.27 cm

  • At 344 m/s: 78.18 cm

3. Perceived Tonal Differences

340 m/s (lower)

  • Slightly darker tone

  • Longer sustain / resonance decay

  • Bass feels "bigger" or "warmer"

  • Less brightness in upper harmonics

344 m/s (correct)

  • Brighter, more accurate tone

  • Proper harmonic relationships

  • More realistic attack transients

  • Better defined note separation


━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Bonus: Concert Hall Reverb Settings

Here are some effect settings inspired by venues like Wigmore Hall:

Delay (Early Reflections)

Parameter          Value         Rationale
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Mix                18%           Maintains C80 Clarity Index of 0 to +2 dB (optimal 
                                 for piano). Higher values mask transient attack;
                                 lower values lose spatial dimension.

Delay Time         17 ms         Matches the Initial Time Delay Gap (ITDG) of
                                 world-class piano halls (15–20 ms). Boston 
                                 Symphony Hall achieves ~15 ms. This timing creates
                                 intimacy without coloring the direct sound.

Feedback           15%           Generates 2–3 natural reflection clusters before
                                 the reverb tail engages. Higher feedback causes
                                 flutter echo; lower values sound artificially dry.

Tone               0             Neutral preserves the piano's full spectrum
                                 (27.5 Hz–4,186 Hz) without artificial coloration.

Mode               +/−           Stereo mode simulates lateral wall reflections
                                 arriving 25–90° off-axis—critical for spatial
                                 envelopment. Ping-pong sounds artificial for
                                 classical acoustics.

Reverb (Tail) — Concert Hall

Parameter          Value         Rationale
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Mix                −4.5 dB       Keeps reverb subordinate to direct signal,
                                 preserving piano's percussive attack. Concert
                                 recordings typically use −6 to −3 dB wet signal.

Duration           1.60 s        RT60 optimized specifically for solo piano.
                                 Wigmore Hall measures ~1.5 s. Piano requires
                                 0.3–0.6 s shorter RT60 than orchestral music
                                 to maintain articulation in rapid passages.

Tone               0             Flat response respects the instrument's natural
                                 timbre across all registers.

Low Cut            60 Hz         Preserves musical bass (Bass Ratio 1.1–1.3) while
                                 filtering sub-bass rumble. Piano's A0 = 27.5 Hz,
                                 but fundamentals below 60 Hz add mud in reverb
                                 tails without musical benefit.

Early Reflections  −9 dB         Reduced because external delay handles ER
                                 simulation. Prevents comb filtering and phase
                                 issues from doubled early reflections.

Room Size          28 m          Corresponds to optimal hall length for 750 seats
                                 (research indicates 25–32 m range). Sets correct
                                 modal spacing and diffusion density for piano.

Pre-delay          0.035 s       Creates 52 ms total gap from direct sound
                                 (17 ms delay + 35 ms pre-delay), separating
                                 the reverb tail from early reflections. This
                                 preserves the Haas effect for localization
                                 while adding depth.

Design Notes:
These settings aim to recreate the intimate, clear, yet warm sound of world-class piano recital halls. The key technique is using a short delay before the reverb to simulate early reflections off walls.

Why This Combination Works

The delay→reverb chain mimics real concert hall physics: sound reaches your ears directly, then bounces off nearby walls (early reflections at 15–50 ms), and finally builds into diffuse reverberation. Most plugins combine these stages internally, but separating them gives precise control over the ITDG, the single most important factor distinguishing intimate halls from cavernous ones.

These values are derived from acoustic measurements of Wigmore Hall, Pierre Boulez Saal, and similar venues optimized for solo piano, not generic "large hall" presets designed for full orchestra.

Why these values?

  • Concert halls designed for piano feature shorter reverb times (1.4–1.8 s) compared to orchestral halls; excessive tail causes fast passages to become muddy.

  • The 17 ms delay mimics sound bouncing off side walls in a ~750-seat hall, providing spatial depth without sacrificing note definition.

  • A subtle reverb mix (−4.5 dB) ensures clarity over wash.

Genre Suggestions:

Genre              Duration       Mix
──────────────────────────────────────────
Baroque            1.3 s          −6 dB      (drier)
Romantic           1.8 s          −3.5 dB    (wetter)

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

References:

  • Cramer, O. (1993). The variation of the specific heat ratio and the speed of sound in air with temperature, pressure, humidity, and CO₂ concentration. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 93(5), 2510–2516.

  • Davis, R.S. (1992). Equation for the determination of the density of moist air. Metrologia, 29, 67–70.

Thank you, Lemuel

Re: Research: Speed of Sound in Pianoteq 9 Has Wrong Default Values

Good catch with respect to the microphone settings on the Steinway D preset.
That said the details of the analysis have been produced by AI , I think it would fair to mention it .

Don’t forget there are online tools that detect Gemini, ChatGPT and DeepSeek content;)

That said AI is very useful for research .

Re: Research: Speed of Sound in Pianoteq 9 Has Wrong Default Values

joannchr wrote:

Good catch with respect to the microphone settings on the Steinway D preset.
That said the details of the analysis have been produced by AI , I think it would fair to mention it .

Don’t forget there are online tools that detect Gemini, ChatGPT and DeepSeek content;)

That said AI is very useful for research .

With all due respect, the microphone settings (8 mics), including positions, delay, volume, and panning in L7 [Dec 27], are based on the Modartt Steinway HB default configuration.

Everything available on the internet has been processed and analyzed by over 8,200+ million people: every book, article, review, and research paper. Ironically, most AI systems would flag your comment as likely human-written precisely because it contains imprecisions.

I believe any tool that helps us achieve better results in less time should be embraced. It's only a matter of time before many routine office tasks are reduced or automated, as people using AI can accomplish the same work with greater precision and efficiency.

Creative work, on the other hand, is fundamentally different. It involves a process rooted in consciousness, one that cannot truly be replicated. Much like your dreams, where you don't even know how you're dreaming them or how you perceive reality, creativity brings something new into existence from nothing, yet never without purpose.

By the way, even the finest tools in the most skilled hands are meaningless without a purpose, and ideally, a just one.

Re: Research: Speed of Sound in Pianoteq 9 Has Wrong Default Values

Lemuel wrote:
joannchr wrote:

Good catch with respect to the microphone settings on the Steinway D preset.
That said the details of the analysis have been produced by AI , I think it would fair to mention it .

Don’t forget there are online tools that detect Gemini, ChatGPT and DeepSeek content;)

That said AI is very useful for research .

With all due respect, the microphone settings (8 mics), including positions, delay, volume, and panning in L7 [Dec 27], are based on the Modartt Steinway HB default configuration.

Everything available on the internet has been processed and analyzed by over 8,200+ million people: every book, article, review, and research paper. Ironically, most AI systems would flag your comment as likely human-written precisely because it contains imprecisions.

I believe any tool that helps us achieve better results in less time should be embraced. It's only a matter of time before many routine office tasks are reduced or automated, as people using AI can accomplish the same work with greater precision and efficiency.

Creative work, on the other hand, is fundamentally different. It involves a process rooted in consciousness, one that cannot truly be replicated. Much like your dreams, where you don't even know how you're dreaming them or how you perceive reality, creativity brings something new into existence from nothing, yet never without purpose.

By the way, even the finest tools in the most skilled hands are meaningless without a purpose, and ideally, a just one.

I fully agree with you say however one should not be shy  to name contribution from the main  AI engines in the same way academic white papers list exhaustively all sources that contributed to the article . Many people are using more AI tools to help with research, but it seems that AI has not yet gained widespread acceptance and there is a reluctance to acknowledge it as a legitimate research source. This is likely due to the fact that researchers, particularly in the field of music, used to spend their time in libraries to delve deeper into a given period , a given compose  or develop a theory, and that this type of research required prior knowledge of the field. In contrast, in 2025, all it takes is submitting any topic to an AI engine on your mobile phone to obtain an extremely detailed synthesis on any subject. The popularization of the intrinsic process of fundamental research is somewhat worrying…

Last edited by joannchr (29-12-2025 20:39)

Re: Research: Speed of Sound in Pianoteq 9 Has Wrong Default Values

Perhaps the existing values are there to make the model sound right, than mirror reality.

Modartt may want to comment here.

Re: Research: Speed of Sound in Pianoteq 9 Has Wrong Default Values

Very interesting post!

An important question is how we should understand the role of Delay in the various Pianoteq presets, and its relation to the Reverb component of the sound.

Lemuel's assumption seems to be that the Delay functions as a kind of early reflections, and should therefore be seen as part of the reverb. The Reverb effect should therefore be more focused on the tail, hence the -9 dB for the reverb tail.

I'm not sure that this is correct, however. For most of the Kawai SK-EX presets, for example, the balance between early reflections and tail in the reverb is set at 0, i.e. equal. Furthermore, while every real-world space has its own specific early reflection pattern, the Delay setting for most Pianoteq presets are highly simlar, even if the room acoustics are very different (say, cathedral vs small hall).

This would suggest that the delay component of the sound contributes something other than early reflections. But what precisely is that something? In some eccentric cases, for example the Steinway B Cosmic preset, it's an overt effect, but mostly the effect is very subtle indeed.

I would be very interested to hear more about this from the developers.

Re: Research: Speed of Sound in Pianoteq 9 Has Wrong Default Values

Pianophile wrote:

Very interesting post!

An important question is how we should understand the role of Delay in the various Pianoteq presets, and its relation to the Reverb component of the sound.

Lemuel's assumption seems to be that the Delay functions as a kind of early reflections, and should therefore be seen as part of the reverb. The Reverb effect should therefore be more focused on the tail, hence the -9 dB for the reverb tail.

I'm not sure that this is correct, however. For most of the Kawai SK-EX presets, for example, the balance between early reflections and tail in the reverb is set at 0, i.e. equal. Furthermore, while every real-world space has its own specific early reflection pattern, the Delay setting for most Pianoteq presets are highly simlar, even if the room acoustics are very different (say, cathedral vs small hall).

This would suggest that the delay component of the sound contributes something other than early reflections. But what precisely is that something? In some eccentric cases, for example the Steinway B Cosmic preset, it's an overt effect, but mostly the effect is very subtle indeed.

I would be very interested to hear more about this from the developers.


Here's the thing: short delays (10-40ms range) and reverb early reflections aren't doing the same job, even though they operate in similar time windows. The research backs this up pretty solidly.

Helmut Haas's original 1949 research showed that reflections arriving within 5-30ms fuse perceptually with the direct sound. They don't create echo, they create *presence* and *body*. Your brain literally can't separate them. Later studies confirmed this extends to 40ms+ for complex signals like piano. You can read more about the precedence effect here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precedence_effect

Now here's where it gets interesting for us pianists: Leo Beranek measured the ITDG (Initial Time Delay Gap) of world-class halls and found Boston Symphony Hall sits at around 15ms, Vienna Musikverein at 28ms. He gave ITDG 40% weighting in his hall quality rating, the single most important factor. That 15-25ms sweet spot is exactly what creates intimacy in great piano venues like Wigmore Hall. There's a solid paper on Beranek's final thoughts on this here: https://www.mdpi.com/2624-599X/1/3/32

The key distinction from reverb's early reflections: natural room reflections carry directional cues, spectral filtering from surfaces, and irregular patterns that tell your brain "I'm in a space." A simple stereo delay doesn't have that complexity, but it *does* exploit the Haas fusion zone to add thickness and depth without the diffuse wash that muddies your articulation. Different tools, different jobs.

One more thing worth knowing: sound takes around 9ms to travel across a 9-foot concert grand through air. So even the "direct" sound from a Steinway D contains inherent delays between different parts of the soundboard. Professional engineers have used 20-30ms delays on piano for decades specifically because it adds body while preserving transient clarity that reverb would smear. iZotope has a nice practical explanation here: https://www.izotope.com/en/learn/what-i...ffect.html

Adding to that, most Pianoteq presets already have mic delays and compensation delays built into the Mics panel. This creates something similar to True Stereo imaging, kind of like what LiquidSonics does with their Fusion-IR technology (dynamic, modulated true stereo convolution that goes beyond static impulse responses) more info: https://www.liquidsonics.com/2022/12/19...rberate-3/ . So when you think about it, your signal chain naturally ends with Reverb handling the room tail, and then the Limiter (which is on by default) catches everything at the end. The Delay effect sits earlier in this chain, working alongside those mic delays to build the instrument's spatial foundation before the room character gets painted on top.

So to your original point: I think both interpretations have merit. The Delay effect *can* function as early reflections simulation, but it's probably more accurate to say it creates the piano's immediate acoustic presence, that sense of the instrument existing in physical space, while the Reverb handles the actual room character. That's why preset designers keep Delay consistent across different acoustic environments: it's about the instrument's envelope, not the room's signature.

Last edited by Lemuel (30-12-2025 12:50)

Re: Research: Speed of Sound in Pianoteq 9 Has Wrong Default Values

Thanks for the elaborate and illuminating response!

ITDG (Initial Time Delay Gap) is, of course, part of a room's signature, as it's the time it takes, in a given room, for the very earliest reflections to reach the listener. So it should be baked into the impulse responses which Pianoteq uses, as well as be a part of the virtual acoustics created by algorithmic reverbs like Cinematic Rooms.  There should be no need, therefore, to use the Delay in Pianoteq to create early reflections / simulate an ITDG.

This still leaves the question of what the very small amount of delay used in most Pianoteq presets does; it clearly isn't adding early reflections. I'm sure it has indeed to do with creating a sense of body and presence for the instruments. But it's unclear to me what this means in practice. What kind of reflections does the Delay add?

By way of experiment, I set the wet slider for the Delay at 100%. This does not create a perceptible delay but it can radically change the instrument timbre and the attack, mellowing the timbre and rounding the attack. At 100%, it sounds weird of course, but you can push the wet level pretty high before it gets too strange. So it seems that for the realistic presets (i.e. not the Steinway B Cosmic), the delay does something subtle to timbre and attack. The delay settings seem to differ per instrument, rather than per acoustic space.

Last edited by Pianophile (30-12-2025 17:09)

Re: Research: Speed of Sound in Pianoteq 9 Has Wrong Default Values

Pianophile wrote:

Thanks for the elaborate and illuminating response!

ITDG (Initial Time Delay Gap) is, of course, part of a room's signature, as it's the time it takes, in a given room, for the very earliest reflections to reach the listener. So it should be baked into the impulse responses which Pianoteq uses, as well as be a part of the virtual acoustics created by algorithmic reverbs like Cinematic Rooms.  There should be no need, therefore, to use the Delay in Pianoteq to create early reflections / simulate an ITDG.

This still leaves the question of what the very small amount of delay used in most Pianoteq presets does; it clearly isn't adding early reflections. I'm sure it has indeed to do with creating a sense of body and presence for the instruments. But it's unclear to me what this means in practice. What kind of reflections does the Delay add?

By way of experiment, I set the wet slider for the Delay at 100%. This does not create a perceptible delay but it can radically change the instrument timbre and the attack, mellowing the timbre and rounding the attack. At 100%, it sounds weird of course, but you can push the wet level pretty high before it gets too strange. So it seems that for the realistic presets (i.e. not the Steinway B Cosmic), the delay does something subtle to timbre and attack. The delay settings seem to differ per instrument, rather than per acoustic space.

Quick response because I have to run, but wanted to add something important about the default Delay + Reverb settings from Modartt.
If you check the Delay defaults, there's a Tone modifier that varies by piano: Steinway and Kawai presets use Tone = -0.50, while Bösendorfer uses +0.05. We know Steinway and Kawai models tend to be brighter in the treble, so that negative Tone value attenuates high frequencies. Bösendorfer has a more balanced character but maybe needs a slight treble boost. Interesting pattern, right?

But here's my point: in a physical modeling context, the Delay effect shouldn't be doing tonal correction work. That's what the modeling itself is for. If you look at base presets like the Bechstein ones (the numbered versions), they have Tone = 0. No correction needed.

This makes me think many presets are using the effects chain to compensate for something in the modeling that could be improved at the source. Ideally, Pianoteq 9.2.0 or a future update would recalculate the modeling so that presets sound realistic without depending on effects to fix tonal balance. If you want effects, you can always add them yourself through your DAW's stock plugins or free VSTs recommended by the audio engineering community. Plenty of good options out there.
The goal should be accurate default modeling first, with effects being creative choices rather than corrective ones. That's the difference between "I need this Delay to fix the brightness" versus "I'm adding this Delay for spatial character."