Topic: Note-off Features and Benefits?

RE:  "You can use any MIDI keyboard . . ."

I am confused by the above statement.

Within the forum I've read numerous posts regarding keyboards and their ability to provide note-off information.

One post discussed some kind or relationship between a keyboards ability to realistically trigger actions such as damper noise, etc. via note-off content.

I am researching the midi piano keyboard market for my next purchase.  And my goal is to play advanced classical pieces which require the utmost in expression/control on a digital piano/MIDI keyboard.  Thinking this next keyboard may be the Kawai MP11SE on up to a Novus10S.

Issue:  Do I need to find out if any of these keyboards are able to generate MIDI-off signals with velocity values, in order to have the most control when playing challenging classical pieces?  I am most interested in dynamics (loud and soft parts) rather than acoustic piano "effects" such as Damper/key/pedal "noise."

Raising this issue because I have two keyboards I am using Pianoteq 8 Pro, with Bluthner Studio Recording AB:
$129 Eastar EP-10 folding keyboard (for travel and tinkering on fingering at my desk), and
$1,100 Yamaha MX88 Synth (GHS Graded Hammer Standard action)

Believe it or not, the $129 folding (spring/synth action) keyboard produces much more beautiful tones/sounds than the Yamaha MX88.
By changing the velocity of the MX88 to "soft" the velocities generated seem to be higher, but the MX88 is barely able to sound as nice as the $129 folding keyboard.

This sort of blows my mind, since I am thinking of spending between $4,000 to $18,000 USD on something "more responsive" . . . (with an action more "grand-piano-like" . . .) 

I really love the sound of the Bluthner Studio Recording AB, and I want to use it with any future piano I purchase, but I want to make sure I can do justice to the beautiful sounds the Bluthner seems capable of producing.

Is the statement "you can use any MIDI keyboard" (with Pianoteq) really accurate--if your goal is the most expressive/dynamic performance possible?  Or is this statement more of a highly simplified description for beginning piano players, so that they don't get overwhelmed with all the details?

Are there real tangible features and benefits derived from note-off information a high-end "grand-piano-like action" might provide, for highly dynamic, classical music?

Thank you for your help.

Re: Note-off Features and Benefits?

Have a look for custom velocity curves for your mx88 keyboard. Or better yet create them yourself.

You want to play advanced classical or jazz pieces?
If you are at this stage already then the feel of a hammer action keyboard should be much better to you, if it's not faulty?

I suppose your Yamaha could be faulty, or you just need to create custom velocity curves for it.

Maybe it's you though?
Perhaps you need to build up strength in your fingers in your playing technique?
Perhaps time away from the keys?

It depends on the sound you are after. Piano solos and jazz and classical music typically requires some dynamic range at the keys. The player needs to be able to control the range of dynamics. At the very least they need to be reasonably sure they'll get a soft, medium or hard attack sound depending on their input.
In contrast with rock and pop you don't want the piano to be drowned out so you have bright hard full velocity sounds to cut through the mix.

Playing any graded hammer action requires more strength in the fingers than lightweight synth action. 
The major benefit of hammer action compared to synth action or the inbetween semi-weighted actions is the degree of real control at your fingertips, otherwise dynamics become much more random. With a delicate touch it's far too easy to get hard dynamics when you really mean to give soft or medium or slip and get soft dynamics - accidentally triggering sounds.
This is where you have to remember that the piano is actually a percussive instrument.

FWIW I found semi weighted actually to be the worst. Neither one thing nor the other.

Pop style presets reduce the dynamics and allow the player to reach that crunchy bright hard sound of full velocity easily.  Perhaps you'll like those for now?

Re: Note-off Features and Benefits?

You'll notice I didn't mention the note on/note offs. I think that's a complete red herring for the situation you are describing.

In simple terms it's either solvable with custom velocity curves and/or improved playing technique, or changing a faulty unit.

You may prefer a different graded hammer action to the one you have. I am not familiar with your Yamaha. I suspect you need to get used to it though, and a lot is achievable through custom velocity curves.

Don't throw money at a problem until you actually know what the problem is!

Re: Note-off Features and Benefits?

MX88 has the same action as the P-45. According to the Velocity Curves sub-forum, people have had problems getting a decent velocity curve for it (you could try the curve suggested in post no.4 - copy the whole line and paste it in to the Velocity Curve section) : https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=4527

Note-off simulates the following characteristics of an acoustic piano: if you play a note loudly, then release the key slowly, you get a sort of flanging effect as the string vibrates against the damper. If you release the key quickly, the string vibration is choked off more abruptly. It's not an absolute must-have, but it's an asset if you appreciate the subtle nuances of classical piano music. The note-off curve needs to be on a slope to get the graduated effect - strangely, the default Pianoteq velocity curves all have the note-off as a fixed value.

Experiment with your MX88 and see what you can do with velocity curves before you start looking for another keyboard!

Re: Note-off Features and Benefits?

dazric wrote:

MX88 has the same action as the P-45. According to the Velocity Curves sub-forum, people have had problems getting a decent velocity curve for it (you could try the curve suggested in post no.4 - copy the whole line and paste it in to the Velocity Curve section) : https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=4527

Note-off simulates the following characteristics of an acoustic piano: if you play a note loudly, then release the key slowly, you get a sort of flanging effect as the string vibrates against the damper. If you release the key quickly, the string vibration is choked off more abruptly. It's not an absolute must-have, but it's an asset if you appreciate the subtle nuances of classical piano music. The note-off curve needs to be on a slope to get the graduated effect - strangely, the default Pianoteq velocity curves all have the note-off as a fixed value.

Experiment with your MX88 and see what you can do with velocity curves before you start looking for another keyboard!

From that thread very negative experience of the Yamaha action:

lovelovemale wrote:

Unfortunately, you're out of luck.
I have a P45 myself and there is no way to play a nice dyanmic from pp to ff or let's not even talk about ppp ^^
Of course you can change the velocity curve but then it will be "loud" and "harsh" all the time!
So it's just not a very good product for midi. Also with the NI libraries the P45 works not very well. Velocities about 127 you will only get by almost breaking your keyboard (even on the softest touch curve in the P45 settings)
I spent days and hours trying to figure this out, I'm selling the P45 now and upgrading to a VPC1. I want to experience this amazing technology 100%.
Hope it helps that you know, if just won't be possible to set it up with a 85-90% authentic acoustic piano feel - unfortunately

In contrast I have failed to better the straight line on my bottom of the range Casio CDP 130. It just feels right (which might mean it just feels right for me rather than another player).
I can combine this keyboard with other keyboards that have synthesizer synth action to play the same preset.  Velocity makes such a big difference they literally sound like different presets or even different instruments for just because of the keyboards!

Sometimes I make custom velocity curbs for specific instrument presets occasionally, nothing universally applicable.

The weakness in affordable hammer action keyboards is generally discovered when trying to trill quickly. It seems even those with three sensors don't fare much better.

Also my CDP can only take a sustain pedal, therefore any other pedals have to be added with USB connectors directly to the computer.

Last edited by Key Fumbler (11-04-2023 14:58)

Re: Note-off Features and Benefits?

I raised this issue some time ago because I had found that different midi keyboards did indeed produce different sound quality. Since then I have had more evidence of this. My Roland A88 produces a very full, rich sound with PTQ (rather like  Roland DP). The Casio I had previously produced a very "thin" sound (rather like some Casio DPs). The Yamaha CLP 725 I have now produces quite a "neutral" sound (like a Yamaha DP), and despite what the user manual tells me it will not produce a MIDI value of 127: 105 is about the limit.  I read some posts on another forum a while ago, where the guys were seriously interested in electronic matters, and they took it for granted that some MIDI keyboards are just better than others. I know those of you who understand MIDI (unlike myself) will cast doubt on all of this, but the differences in sound are very obvious to me. And, yes, I have spent (wasted?) a great deal of time on velocity curves. IMO the issue of MIDI quality should be discussed and assessed when we're choosing an instrument.

Re: Note-off Features and Benefits?

Key Fumbler wrote:

Have a look for custom velocity curves for your mx88 keyboard. Or better yet create them yourself.

You want to play advanced classical or jazz pieces?
If you are at this stage already then the feel of a hammer action keyboard should be much better to you, if it's not faulty?

I suppose your Yamaha could be faulty, or you just need to create custom velocity curves for it.

Maybe it's you though?
Perhaps you need to build up strength in your fingers in your playing technique?
Perhaps time away from the keys?

It depends on the sound you are after. Piano solos and jazz and classical music typically requires some dynamic range at the keys. The player needs to be able to control the range of dynamics. At the very least they need to be reasonably sure they'll get a soft, medium or hard attack sound depending on their input.
In contrast with rock and pop you don't want the piano to be drowned out so you have bright hard full velocity sounds to cut through the mix.

Playing any graded hammer action requires more strength in the fingers than lightweight synth action. 
The major benefit of hammer action compared to synth action or the inbetween semi-weighted actions is the degree of real control at your fingertips, otherwise dynamics become much more random. With a delicate touch it's far too easy to get hard dynamics when you really mean to give soft or medium or slip and get soft dynamics - accidentally triggering sounds.
This is where you have to remember that the piano is actually a percussive instrument.

FWIW I found semi weighted actually to be the worst. Neither one thing nor the other.

Pop style presets reduce the dynamics and allow the player to reach that crunchy bright hard sound of full velocity easily.  Perhaps you'll like those for now?

>>Thank you for the thoughtful comments Key Fumbler.
Probably some of everything you brought up applies.  Yes, I am a relative novice piano player (about 1.5 years, self-taught, 68 years old, practice many hours per day).  Through my practicing, I have learned both classical pieces (Debussy Jimbo's Lullaby and pop pieces such as Talking in Your Sleep by The Romantics 129 BPM).  Not having played lots of pianos, I don't have much experience with various "actions."

What I have learned is that a moderately fast pop piece 129 bpm is fun and easy on my "synth" action (spring?) keyboard Eastar EP-10.  It seems "light and fast."  Then I play the same song on the Yamaha MX88 GHS graded hammer standard action it seems "heavy and slow" . . . it seems more tedious and tiring.  I've read that classical pianists seem to prefer light and fast grand piano keyboards and that they allow for more expression (if you have the skills I am sure . . .)

My current challenge is learning Prokofiev's Montagues and Capulets--the first piece where it uses f forte and ff.  Per other comments below, which I will respond too, my cheap synth action keyboard does seem to produce the "flangy" (metallic?) kind of sound from the Bluthner software.  It does seem to be "hard" in tone--but it is clear and not muddy, it seems "pure/clean" somehow to me and I like it (when it is not hitting 127 in the Pianoteq Velocity window).  When I use the Yamaha MX88--even with the custom curve recommended below, the tone is more muddy--it sounds like I need to run it through an equalizer to brighten it.

Without piano store visits (due to Covid and fear of playing for other people), I am guessing that I need a light and fast action that gives me more control.  Jimbo's Lullaby features ppp pianississimo and pp etc. passages.  It closes with a Bb0 note played staccatissimo that should be played very quietly, that I struggle to reproduce quiet enough--perhaps my technique/control (or lack of it, and I am trying not to "cheat" by adjusting this single note's volume in Pianoteq--I want to improve my technique).

So this is why I think I need to upgrade my piano.  I am in no rush to spend unnecessary money.  Hence, this is why I am trying to understand all the dials and levers offered by Pianoteq to tune a performance and its relationship to more expensive hardware if I must upgrade.  Note-off and its velocity value is one of those dials and levers and the Pianoteq manual does not seem to get into it.  When I look at the Note-off window in Pianoteq both my keyboards produce the single/fixed "64" value people are talking about in the forum (changing the Note-off horizontal line to a diagonal line seems to have zero effect)i.  When I use the Midi Monitor app on my Mac I see note-on and note-off, but I see no note-off velocity value.  Do I need this for expressivity if I shop for another piano, and why or why not?

Re: Note-off Features and Benefits?

Key Fumbler wrote:

You'll notice I didn't mention the note on/note offs. I think that's a complete red herring for the situation you are describing.

In simple terms it's either solvable with custom velocity curves and/or improved playing technique, or changing a faulty unit.

You may prefer a different graded hammer action to the one you have. I am not familiar with your Yamaha. I suspect you need to get used to it though, and a lot is achievable through custom velocity curves.

Don't throw money at a problem until you actually know what the problem is!

>>Per the comment below from another reply to my post, on using the Yamaha P45 GHS Graded Hammer Action keyboard (similar to the Yamaha MX88 I am using) . . . I discovered this comment:

Pianoteq Forum: lovelovemale wrote:

Unfortunately, you're out of luck.
I have a P45 myself and there is no way to play a nice dynamic from pp to ff or let’s not even talk about ppp.
Of course you can change the velocity curve but then it will be loud and "harsh all the time!
So it's just not a very good product for midi. Also with the NI libraries the P45 works not very well. Velocities about 127 you will only get by almost breaking your keyboard (even on the softest touch curve in the P45 settings)
I spent days and hours trying to figure this out, I'm selling the P45 now and upgrading to a VPC1. I want to experience this amazing technology 100%
Hope it helps that you know, if just won't be possible to set it up with a 85-90% authentic acoustic piano feel - unfortunately

Re: Note-off Features and Benefits?

I'm pretty sure that if you get a decent quality recent model DP it will have variable note-off. You can check if your MX88 is sending variable note-off by opening the note-off window and watching as you play a few random notes. If the line always comes up in the same place, it's sending a fixed value note-off. - (edit) ah, I just read your post above, it looks as if the MX88 is sending a fixed value note-off, so you won't notice any difference if you set the curve on a slope!

Last edited by dazric (11-04-2023 17:37)

Re: Note-off Features and Benefits?

dazric wrote:

MX88 has the same action as the P-45. According to the Velocity Curves sub-forum, people have had problems getting a decent velocity curve for it (you could try the curve suggested in post no.4 - copy the whole line and paste it in to the Velocity Curve section) : https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=4527

Note-off simulates the following characteristics of an acoustic piano: if you play a note loudly, then release the key slowly, you get a sort of flanging effect as the string vibrates against the damper. If you release the key quickly, the string vibration is choked off more abruptly. It's not an absolute must-have, but it's an asset if you appreciate the subtle nuances of classical piano music. The note-off curve needs to be on a slope to get the graduated effect - strangely, the default Pianoteq velocity curves all have the note-off as a fixed value.

Experiment with your MX88 and see what you can do with velocity curves before you start looking for another keyboard!

>>Thank you Dazric.  The P-45 curve and post were interesting.  And yes that sort of "flanging effect" seems to be part of this--a sort of extra bright character that the Yamaha MX88 is struggling to produce.  In the post you referred me to, lovelovemale states that the Yamaha P45 GHS Graded Hammer Standard action cannot play "a nice dynamic pp to ff or let's not even talk about ppp . . . you can change the velocity curve but then it will be harsh all the time . .  not a very good product for midi . . . upgrading to a (Kawai) VPC1.

Re: Note-off Features and Benefits?

dazric wrote:

I'm pretty sure that if you get a decent quality recent model DP it will have variable note-off. You can check if your MX88 is sending variable note-off by opening the note-off window and watching as you play a few random notes. If the line always comes up in the same place, it's sending a fixed value note-off.

>Hi Dazric, thank you, and yes, all I get is a single fixed line on the Pianoteq Note-off window for both my low cost keyboards.  Hence, this is why I am entertaining the idea of a new keyboard upgrade.  Any idea if a higher end keyboard (e.g. Kawai MP11SE or above in cost) will offer Note-off, velocity values and will this allow me to play ppp through fff (of course assuming I have the skill to use this feature).

Re: Note-off Features and Benefits?

Variable note-off is a subtle effect - although it's nice to have, it's the note-on velocity range that's significant. There's no substitute for trying keyboards for yourself, unfortunately - it has to feel right to you. Personally, I recommend Roland - I have the FP-30, which is hardly 'high-end', but I can get a very good velocity range out of it. I haven't tried Casio but I've read very good reports about them. Others will say 'go for Kawai', so there you go...

Re: Note-off Features and Benefits?

Panicking Ant wrote:

I raised this issue some time ago because I had found that different midi keyboards did indeed produce different sound quality. Since then I have had more evidence of this. My Roland A88 produces a very full, rich sound with PTQ (rather like  Roland DP). The Casio I had previously produced a very "thin" sound (rather like some Casio DPs). The Yamaha CLP 725 I have now produces quite a "neutral" sound (like a Yamaha DP), and despite what the user manual tells me it will not produce a MIDI value of 127: 105 is about the limit.  I read some posts on another forum a while ago, where the guys were seriously interested in electronic matters, and they took it for granted that some MIDI keyboards are just better than others. I know those of you who understand MIDI (unlike myself) will cast doubt on all of this, but the differences in sound are very obvious to me. And, yes, I have spent (wasted?) a great deal of time on velocity curves. IMO the issue of MIDI quality should be discussed and assessed when we're choosing an instrument.

>>Thank you Panicking Ant . . . think I needed a sanity check like this.  I know in the end it all boils down to 1's and 0's in the computer world, but in my brief piano experience I am noticing changes in the nature of the "tone."  Its almost like the sound is running through an stereo equalizer and the different pianos have different equalizer settings.  It appears this has something to do with differences in piano action, velocity curves and note-offs, and I am just trying to get my head around all the moving parts, so that if I invest in another midi keyboard, it has all the dials and levers needed to tune the sound to what I like.  But statements like "you can use any MIDI keyboard . . ." are not helping me identify my next "perfect" keyboard.  Per your above statement " . . . guys were seriously interested in electronic matters, and they took it for granted that some MIDI keyboards are just better than others . . ."  How do you quantify this?  How do you pick the right one for Pianoteq? 

Per another post I think, I read that some piano stores have Pianoteq on a thumb drive and you can try it out on various pianos . . . is this what piano shoppers need to do?  Or are there hard specs I can read that will help me avoid this?  I am already stressed out by having to make a major investment like this . . .

Re: Note-off Features and Benefits?

For me release (note-of) velocity is important, because it increases the realism of playing, especially when playing legato (single voice and polyphonic). Anyway, I wouldn't buy a piano/keyboard without it. Luckily my old Kawai CS7 uses and outputs this parameter and Pianoteq can it use.
Notes endings and transitions between them sound slightly different depending on how quickly your finger/hand ends the note.

I do not know what keyboards have this implemented, but here is some list:
https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=579405

Last edited by MaurizioP (11-04-2023 18:01)

Re: Note-off Features and Benefits?

The problem with the internet and the realities of the world of today is getting a hands on physical frame of reference.

Knowing how much you really have to spend on anything to achieve the performance you want is that much harder today.
When you come online you will hear people talking about big big differences in audio or video quality or midi keyboard playability. How much of this is accurate and how much actually comes down to subjective fallibility, snobbery, expectation bias, and flawed testing methodology who knows!

Of course salespeople in shops don't all want you to know the optimal bang for buck, however trying for yourself is probably the best way.

As you are prepared to spend the big bucks anyway visiting a piano dealer should be no problem.
I expect you could take a laptop and some headphones with Pianoteq on it to a dealer. Hook up some of the midi keyboards such as vpc1 and Kawai and Casio hybrid grand digital pianos and equivalents. 

Try different levels of gear. Tell them your situation. 

If you are not using a laptop when you're considering spending several thousands a low-cost laptop in the low hundreds ( one that's powerful enough to run Pianoteq well) could be written off as a relatively modest part of the cost!

Re: Note-off Features and Benefits?

MaurizioP wrote:

For me release (note-of) velocity is important, because it increases the realism of playing, especially when playing legato (single voice and polyphonic). Anyway, I wouldn't buy a piano/keyboard without it. Luckily my old Kawai CS7 uses and outputs this parameter and Pianoteq can it use.
Notes endings and transitions between them sound slightly different depending on how quickly your finger/hand ends the note.

I do not know what keyboards have this implemented, but here is some list:
https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=579405

>>Thank you MaurizioP, that web page is interesting.  And I hadn't even thought of a DAW needing to be compatible with Note-off velocity data.  Any idea ff the note-off velocity data is helpful in creating ppp thru fff dynamics?  Is it a nice-to-have or a must have?  Thanks again.

Re: Note-off Features and Benefits?

DeanP wrote:
MaurizioP wrote:

For me release (note-of) velocity is important, because it increases the realism of playing, especially when playing legato (single voice and polyphonic). Anyway, I wouldn't buy a piano/keyboard without it. Luckily my old Kawai CS7 uses and outputs this parameter and Pianoteq can it use.
Notes endings and transitions between them sound slightly different depending on how quickly your finger/hand ends the note.

I do not know what keyboards have this implemented, but here is some list:
https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=579405

>>Thank you MaurizioP, that web page is interesting.  And I hadn't even thought of a DAW needing to be compatible with Note-off velocity data.  Any idea ff the note-off velocity data is helpful in creating ppp thru fff dynamics?  Is it a nice-to-have or a must have?  Thanks again.

For me (and I'm a pianist) note-off is like… half-pedaling with your finger for each note ;-) Of course, a similar sound can sometimes be achieved with appropriate pedaling and reverb, but not always. Also notes repetion is a little different with variable key release velocity. The same for trills and tremolo. I think it’s a must-have.

Re: Note-off Features and Benefits?

MaurizioP wrote:

For me (and I'm a pianist) note-off is like… half-pedaling with your finger for each note ;-) Of course, a similar sound can sometimes be achieved with appropriate pedaling and reverb, but not always. Also notes repetion is a little different with variable key release velocity. The same for trills and tremolo. I think it’s a must-have.

Yes Modartt themselves seem to value half pedalling more than note offs, judging by comments during velocity response calibration
. Three or four pedals should probably be the entry standard for the serious classical pianists too. 

This is obviously an entirely legitimate position for a serious pianist like yourself.  However your personal requirement for advanced features like this shouldn't get confused with the OPs issue with the suboptimal performance of his velocity response on his Yamaha keyboard. Not that you have here, just trying to keep it simple for now.
I say this because he was showing a preference for a keyboard that should never be preferable to a correctly designed graded hammer action, even a rock bottom range design for beginners. Considerations for half pedalling and additional pedals some way off.

If he goes for a high end digital piano he won't have to consider any of these issues as every general engineering compromise normally found in lesser keyboards will be solved in one go. However to then attribute its superiority to the presence of the note off instructions (the thread topic) anyone doing so would be on shaky ground.

Last edited by Key Fumbler (12-04-2023 05:58)

Re: Note-off Features and Benefits?

Key Fumbler wrote:
MaurizioP wrote:

For me (and I'm a pianist) note-off is like… half-pedaling with your finger for each note ;-) Of course, a similar sound can sometimes be achieved with appropriate pedaling and reverb, but not always. Also notes repetion is a little different with variable key release velocity. The same for trills and tremolo. I think it’s a must-have.

Yes Modartt themselves seem to value half pedalling more than note offs, judging by comments during velocity response calibration
. Three or four pedals should probably be the entry standard for the serious classical pianists too. 

This is obviously an entirely legitimate position for a serious pianist like yourself.  However your personal requirement for advanced features like this shouldn't get confused with the OPs issue with the suboptimal performance of his velocity response on his Yamaha keyboard. Not that you have here, just trying to keep it simple for now.
I say this because he was showing a preference for a keyboard that should never be preferable to a correctly designed graded hammer action, even a rock bottom range design for beginners. Considerations for half pedalling and additional pedals some way off.

If he goes for a high end digital piano he won't have to consider any of these issues as every general engineering compromise normally found in lesser keyboards will be solved in one go. However to then attribute its superiority to the presence of the note off instructions (the thread topic) anyone doing so would be on shaky ground.

Of course, I answered the question from my point of view (which I underlined) and motivated the answer - it was not my intention to confuse anyone. What matters to me is the possibility of practicing on a digital instrument as close as possible to an acoustic one. It doesn't just depend on keyboard mechanics or instrument's sound, but many other factors, including half pedaling and release velocity. The higher the level of advancement, the more important the subject of this thread is, and subtle differences play a greater role.

When I was choosing a digital piano a few years ago, I played many in the store, but finally I chose the CS7 and difference for me was remarkable. At the time I didn't know why - but more realistic playing experience probably also depended (among many other features) on that note-off velocity. Regardless I've had the chance to play many good digital keyboards without it I believe, that since you can buy a keyboard that uses this, it's better to buy one - even for the future :-)

Re: Note-off Features and Benefits?

MaurizioP wrote:
Key Fumbler wrote:
MaurizioP wrote:

For me (and I'm a pianist) note-off is like… half-pedaling with your finger for each note ;-) Of course, a similar sound can sometimes be achieved with appropriate pedaling and reverb, but not always. Also notes repetion is a little different with variable key release velocity. The same for trills and tremolo. I think it’s a must-have.

Yes Modartt themselves seem to value half pedalling more than note offs, judging by comments during velocity response calibration
. Three or four pedals should probably be the entry standard for the serious classical pianists too. 

This is obviously an entirely legitimate position for a serious pianist like yourself.  However your personal requirement for advanced features like this shouldn't get confused with the OPs issue with the suboptimal performance of his velocity response on his Yamaha keyboard. Not that you have here, just trying to keep it simple for now.
I say this because he was showing a preference for a keyboard that should never be preferable to a correctly designed graded hammer action, even a rock bottom range design for beginners. Considerations for half pedalling and additional pedals some way off.

If he goes for a high end digital piano he won't have to consider any of these issues as every general engineering compromise normally found in lesser keyboards will be solved in one go. However to then attribute its superiority to the presence of the note off instructions (the thread topic) anyone doing so would be on shaky ground.

Of course, I answered the question from my point of view (which I underlined) and motivated the answer - it was not my intention to confuse anyone. What matters to me is the possibility of practicing on a digital instrument as close as possible to an acoustic one. It doesn't just depend on keyboard mechanics or instrument's sound, but many other factors, including half pedaling and release velocity. The higher the level of advancement, the more important the subject of this thread is, and subtle differences play a greater role.

When I was choosing a digital piano a few years ago, I played many in the store, but finally I chose the CS7 and difference for me was remarkable. At the time I didn't know why - but more realistic playing experience probably also depended (among many other features) on that note-off velocity. Regardless I've had the chance to play many good digital keyboards without it I believe, that since you can buy a keyboard that uses this, it's better to buy one - even for the future :-)

I didn't for a moment think it was your intention to confuse anyone. It's my failure to communicate properly that I've given you this impression.
I don't think your reply would do that either. I pretty much agree with everything you say in this post.

As I said before if he goes immediately to the high end models he won't have to consider these compromises. So if a user can afford it easily then going for that even at the beginning makes sense, especially if they wish to move on to (or also play) real acoustic piano.

Personally I have several different synth action keyboards along with the graded  hammer action. I know how radically different the sound can be with different keyboards. The mechanical elements of the action together with the software combine to alter the velocity response thus the sound  substantially.
His fold up synth action keyboard will hit maximum velocities very easily (read too easily with little genuine control). So the range of sound will be pleasingly dynamic. That doesn't make it remotely good for playing piano; at least as the main keyboard anyway - now in Pianoteq standalone you can play 3 midi keyboards for three different instruments, so his fold up synth action keyboard could perhaps sit on top of any piano he chooses for secondary sounds.