Topic: Kawai VPC1 versus Doepfner Masterkeyboard

Dear Community,

I have tried the VPC1 from Kawai, but the overall mechanic precision was not satisfying. I need to say that I want to integrate a keyboard into an old small Grand Piano. Since I have no confidence anymore in the VPC1 I found an alternative:

https://www.thomann.de/de/doepfer_lmk4_...t_case.htm

Does anybody have experience with the Doepfner Keyboard? One advantage certainly is the fact that it can easily be integrated. Unfortunately, I did not find any other alternative. The most important issue for this use case is the "touch and feel" simulation of a real piano mechanic.

Thank you for your advice.
Kind regards
Stephan

Re: Kawai VPC1 versus Doepfner Masterkeyboard

stephan wrote:

Dear Community,

I have tried the VPC1 from Kawai, but the overall mechanic precision was not satisfying. I need to say that I want to integrate a keyboard into an old small Grand Piano. Since I have no confidence anymore in the VPC1 I found an alternative:

https://www.thomann.de/de/doepfer_lmk4_...t_case.htm

Does anybody have experience with the Doepfner Keyboard? One advantage certainly is the fact that it can easily be integrated. Unfortunately, I did not find any other alternative. The most important issue for this use case is the "touch and feel" simulation of a real piano mechanic.

Thank you for your advice.
Kind regards
Stephan

In my humble opinion, this fatar action is definitely not in the same league than the VPC1. The action on the VPC1 once finely adjusted , with the right velocity curve and flattening of the extreme portions of the curve instead of linear ( for Pianoteq) is hard to beat. As a classical pianist , I find that with the control of dynamics and in particular pianissimo is truly phenomenal. But piano action is always something personal , like piano sound, so, at the end of the day if you like the Fatar DP 40H action , go for it.

Re: Kawai VPC1 versus Doepfner Masterkeyboard

Thank you very much for the answer. I understand that the VPC1 has the best action system possible. I am a bit confused. When I tried my (new) VPC1 I realized huge differences in the MIDI output on each key. Although I hit the keys with the same weight. Certainly, you can adjust the MIDI output with the software which comes along with the VPC1. I took a look at the inner area of the VPC1. I really don't understand what I see. Perhaps you might want to take a look at the pictures:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4d1kh3x6poko...prEOa?dl=0

* The screws in the back part of the mechanism touch the black area of support partly to 50%;
* In the front area of the mechanism the hammer seems to slip from the grey area of support - it does not slip down really, it just looks so;
* The hammerheads seem to line up as a roller coaster instead of a line of accuracy;

In my further investigations, I was told from a profound side that all VPC1 look like this. But this should not influence the functionality. I really stuck and I don't know how to assess this.

How does it strike you?

My key issue is the following: I want to restore an old "Grand Piano". Concerning the keyboard I have two options:

1.) Use an electronic keyboard such as the VPC1;
2.) Restore the old "Renner Keyboard" and include the following mechanism, e.g.:
https://www.pianoteile.com/public/produ...amp;red=pr

The advantage of a VPC1 is very silent playing whereby the use of the original Keyboard most likely makes more noise while playing.

Any ideas from your side are welcome.

Kind regards
Stephan

Re: Kawai VPC1 versus Doepfner Masterkeyboard

I use the VPC1...I haven't calibrated it with the software that comes with it.  That seems pretty tedious work.  I might try it...note by note with a calibrated weigh.  I think real pianos have the same issue though.  If F3 plays too loud...I learn to hit it softer.

Last edited by Zumadale (24-02-2023 20:19)
Pianoteq 8 Standard-Chord AI - Android App (displays chords)-Kawai VPC1
Real Samick (Stencil) Parlor Grand (5'6")-Focusrite 6i6 2nd

Re: Kawai VPC1 versus Doepfner Masterkeyboard

I have an older samick grand and the pin block is getting worn...and the pins are starting to slip.  I've thought about installing the VPC1 into it and cutting all the strings.  You can install transducers on the soundboard for sound too.  Not sure it would be worth all the work.

Pianoteq 8 Standard-Chord AI - Android App (displays chords)-Kawai VPC1
Real Samick (Stencil) Parlor Grand (5'6")-Focusrite 6i6 2nd

Re: Kawai VPC1 versus Doepfner Masterkeyboard

Stephan, I am amazed at the inaccuracies of your keyboard, I have an old kawai digital piano with a similar, older gf2 mechanic, but everything is precise here. Only the weights of the hammers are not aligned (not at the same height) due to the adjustment of the mechanism for each key. But the key should push the hammer pin with its center, not sideways! This (at your photos) looks like a defect (?) and may affect the evenness of the sounds.
https://uc4e9fd2eddeccf753e4325a3ed0.previews.dropboxusercontent.com/p/thumb/AB2sJZm5gcs4qD0EnJpARRe-ndLnGQ-KxIX04HC0R1UNRA7y3jYe_7VVsEocIUd6yq__l2tOZahg3c6hPyoio-PDm_iK1amm88rR-bL2m08HrrRu0tvogM4z41z_cDKy9-K8waTCagqOE-5ahcwHzGl1tGCpt21iq5OzG1oGoayNi0qqIjVDZ4oAZ0CKsYYy5aqVqEOQ4Q4cUWpLcrvn3oq3cfRRveasFQVkKaPJHE__BoNq8m49SfYQ9Y_SiENf2SoH0P2POp9oJjagvWNTdC4WLkt-4jmrkU4cDQoHz3lvFR0PJTh426dKaSPK4W-T6aukBL_s1aR3fAS7fAWi0n_Ausu90tVQqjoqWIG77YHufQLz71mfx8o9cXdLR9d7MJE/p.jpeg

I doubt that there are such inaccuracies in other vpc1 keyboards. Maybe send these pics to Kawai support and ask if it could look like this?

Last edited by MaurizioP (24-02-2023 23:00)

Re: Kawai VPC1 versus Doepfner Masterkeyboard

stephan wrote:

My key issue is the following: I want to restore an old "Grand Piano". Concerning the keyboard I have two options:

1.) Use an electronic keyboard such as the VPC1;
2.) Restore the old "Renner Keyboard" and include the following mechanism

I think these are two completely different options and you should think harder about your goals.

Option 1) is basically just getting some arguably nicer cosmetics for a normal digital piano. I understand that some people value aesthetics a lot, but I don't and I'd consider that just a gimmick. Nothing wrong if that's what you want, but be clear that you have simply the digital keyboard that you are going to stuff into the piano. I think the VPC1 is a fine as any (in its price range) as any other option. You can find ad-nauseam discussions about which keyboard is better in many digital piano forums (less so on this one).

I think the specimen in your possession is defective, so you'd have to get it fixed or replaced, but that is somewhat orthogonal to the discussion I am putting forward.

Option 2) is a total different beast, and it comes in two subvarieties. The first, is using something like the Pianoteile you posted (but there are a few others, for example QRS and Pianodisc, easy found, or Yamaha Disklavier, possible only on the used market of spare parts). In my opinion this is a subpar option, because these systems are designed to not disrupt the normal operations of the piano (particularly hammers hitting the strings), and as such they have limits on how they try to achieve the goal. Since your instrument is not an acoustic anymore, you'd be limiting yourself for no reasons. The second subvariety is basically building a Yamaha N1x or Kawai Novus NV10. This means that you will getting the absolutely best digital piano possible today. Price and effort will reflect that. The best way to do that is to have both hammer and keyboard sensors. There are no commercial options (yet?) for doing this, but you can take inspiration by like people such as https://github.com/gzweigle/DIY-Grand-Digital-Piano and https://github.com/jkominek/piano-conversion perhaps contact them and see what they are doing and if they are willing to collaborate with you.

So before moving forward you must think hard about your goals: just beautify regular tech of relatively inexpensive keyboards, or building something unique utilizing the very best technology available today, putting in the required effort and money?
If you are not clear with yourself about your goal, I doubt you will be able to be happy with the result

Last edited by dv (24-02-2023 22:39)
Where do I find a list of all posts I upvoted? :(

Re: Kawai VPC1 versus Doepfner Masterkeyboard

stephan wrote:

* The hammerheads seem to line up as a roller coaster instead of a line of accuracy;

Do you know that Key Switch Adjustment?

Line-up of the hammers is not the primary goal of that Key Switch Adjustment procedure.

In my further investigations, I was told from a profound side that all VPC1 look like this.

What makes that person "profound"? Has this person seen your attached photos?

Re: Kawai VPC1 versus Doepfner Masterkeyboard

stephan wrote:

Thank you very much for the answer. I understand that the VPC1 has the best action system possible. I am a bit confused. When I tried my (new) VPC1 I realized huge differences in the MIDI output on each key. Although I hit the keys with the same weight. Certainly, you can adjust the MIDI output with the software which comes along with the VPC1. I took a look at the inner area of the VPC1. I really don't understand what I see. Perhaps you might want to take a look at the pictures:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4d1kh3x6poko...prEOa?dl=0

* The screws in the back part of the mechanism touch the black area of support partly to 50%;
* In the front area of the mechanism the hammer seems to slip from the grey area of support - it does not slip down really, it just looks so;
* The hammerheads seem to line up as a roller coaster instead of a line of accuracy;

In my further investigations, I was told from a profound side that all VPC1 look like this. But this should not influence the functionality. I really stuck and I don't know how to assess this.

How does it strike you?

My key issue is the following: I want to restore an old "Grand Piano". Concerning the keyboard I have two options:

1.) Use an electronic keyboard such as the VPC1;
2.) Restore the old "Renner Keyboard" and include the following mechanism, e.g.:
https://www.pianoteile.com/public/produ...amp;red=pr

The advantage of a VPC1 is very silent playing whereby the use of the original Keyboard most likely makes more noise while playing.

Any ideas from your side are welcome.

Kind regards
Stephan

I am very intrigued by the pictures you have taken. I haven't actually open the VPC1 but have gone through the process of calibrating  keys using Brass Gram Weights and adjusting midi output when needed. A part the normal differences due to graded design, i didn't had any big delta in midi output to deal with. So unfortunately, I cannot assist here as I am not sure whether what you see on the pictures  you have taken is actually what causes the inconstancy of response in your VPC1 so , probably best to talk to Kawai support . Best .

Re: Kawai VPC1 versus Doepfner Masterkeyboard

stephan wrote:

Thank you very much for the answer. I understand that the VPC1 has the best action system possible. I am a bit confused. When I tried my (new) VPC1 I realized huge differences in the MIDI output on each key. Although I hit the keys with the same weight. Certainly, you can adjust the MIDI output with the software which comes along with the VPC1. I took a look at the inner area of the VPC1. I really don't understand what I see. Perhaps you might want to take a look at the pictures:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4d1kh3x6poko...prEOa?dl=0

* The screws in the back part of the mechanism touch the black area of support partly to 50%;
* In the front area of the mechanism the hammer seems to slip from the grey area of support - it does not slip down really, it just looks so;
* The hammerheads seem to line up as a roller coaster instead of a line of accuracy;

In my further investigations, I was told from a profound side that all VPC1 look like this. But this should not influence the functionality. I really stuck and I don't know how to assess this.

How does it strike you?

My key issue is the following: I want to restore an old "Grand Piano". Concerning the keyboard I have two options:

1.) Use an electronic keyboard such as the VPC1;
2.) Restore the old "Renner Keyboard" and include the following mechanism, e.g.:
https://www.pianoteile.com/public/produ...amp;red=pr

The advantage of a VPC1 is very silent playing whereby the use of the original Keyboard most likely makes more noise while playing.

Any ideas from your side are welcome.

Kind regards
Stephan

It seems money is no concern for you:
How about getting the Ravenworks VPC-1: They optimize the Action.

Or how about going for some higher end device, in the 10k€ region? There are a few with Triple Sensor + Opto-Electronic Sensor technologies.

Greets

Ubuntu 22 + Kernel lowlatency + 1000Hz + PipeWire + WirePlumber | i5-8265U + taskset Limit 4 Cores + CPUPower-GUI fixed clock freq | PTQ8Stage @ 32bit/48kHz/128Buffer/256Polyphony = Perf. Index ~60-90

Re: Kawai VPC1 versus Doepfner Masterkeyboard

I've used the VPC1 with Pianoteq for a long time now (basically since it came out) and am very happy with it. Whatever I practice on the VPC1 translates well to my Grotrian-Steinweg grand piano, which to me is a sign that it's a good piano controller.

I've not recently played the Doepfer in a long time but from what I remember it's far less piano-like than the VPC1.

Pianoteq + VPC 1 is a great combination and I doubt you find anything better without spending a whole lot more (on a Kawai Novus, for example, which is not exactly portable, if that's a factor for you). When my Grotrian badly needs tuning (as it does now), I find myself playing Pianoteq + VPC1 instead.

I do have the Pro version of Pianoteq so that I can change the volume of individual keys, for example. For many Pianoteq presents, especially the top octave strikes me as a bit loud. I'm not sure if it's Pianoteq or the VPC1 but being able to edit parameters for individual keys is useful here; I think it's worth the extra money. .

The one downside of the VPC1 is that the pedal is not great. I bought a new one a few years back, though, and so far it seems a lot more reliable and durable than the first one.