<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Monophonic couplers saved in combination?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=10931&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2023-10-12T02:30:35Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=10931</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Monophonic couplers saved in combination?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=993051#p993051"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#039;s great that not only OTQ 2 is out, but it&#039;s still getting immediate and active attention from the devs! <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i> <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i> <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[tmyoung]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3155</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-10-12T02:30:35Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=993051#p993051</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Monophonic couplers saved in combination?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=993050#p993050"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Gzavié wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Hi,</p><p>Thank you all for your feedbacks and inputs on the monophonic couplers behaviour during the combination snapshot.</p><p>The version 2.0.2, now online, fixes that : the monophonic couplers are now added to the snapshot action, and will take either the &#039;On&#039; or &#039;Off&#039; state.</p><p>Regarding the general questions/suggestions/discussions on a &#039;Set to None&#039; option during a combination snapshot, a lot of nice ideas and suggestions have emerged here and in <a href="http:///https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=10935">the other related thread</a>. We have taken due note of these, and will have them in mind for possible later updates.</p></blockquote></div><p>Here&#039;s the link: <a href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=10935">https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=10935</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[tmyoung]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3155</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-10-12T02:29:29Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=993050#p993050</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Monophonic couplers saved in combination?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=993047#p993047"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Gzavié wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>The version 2.0.2, now online, fixes that : the monophonic couplers are now added to the snapshot action, and will take either the &#039;On&#039; or &#039;Off&#039; state.</p></blockquote></div><p>Thank you!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Stephen_Doonan]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4838</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-10-11T20:35:27Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=993047#p993047</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Monophonic couplers saved in combination?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=993037#p993037"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>Thank you all for your feedbacks and inputs on the monophonic couplers behaviour during the combination snapshot.</p><p>The version 2.0.2, now online, fixes that : the monophonic couplers are now added to the snapshot action, and will take either the &#039;On&#039; or &#039;Off&#039; state.</p><p>Regarding the general questions/suggestions/discussions on a &#039;Set to None&#039; option during a combination snapshot, a lot of nice ideas and suggestions have emerged here and in <a href="http:///https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=10935">the other related thread</a>. We have taken due note of these, and will have them in mind for possible later updates.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Gzavié]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8140</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-10-11T15:48:09Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=993037#p993037</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Monophonic couplers saved in combination?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=993005#p993005"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>tmyoung wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>There is a possible bug in that there is technically a fourth parameter I&#039;ve encountered in some presets which can change around randomly.&nbsp; For example, when opening Baroque Church 1-4 today, the Grand Orgue 16&#039; Quint, 2 2/3&#039; Quint, Mixture IV, Zimbel, and Trommet all had blank settings instead of either on, off, or none.&nbsp; I don&#039;t know how exactly those blanks behave but they seem to usually be acting like an &quot;off&quot; parameter (and I couldn&#039;t tell if it&#039;s a UI issue, a combination issue, or a preset issue--I just know I&#039;m running Windows), but once you click on those stops, it will only cycle through the correct three options.&nbsp; Also, when switching combinations in the combination window, these blanks stayed around but sometimes affected different stops.&nbsp; When changing their values away from blank, the preset didn&#039;t say it needed to be saved, so I&#039;m not entirely sure what&#039;s happening there or why.</p></blockquote></div><p>This behavior is reproducible. However, it doesn&#039;t necessarily have to be a bug in the software; incorrect values could also be stored in the presets.<br />I also see the problem as uncritical since the empty fields obviously correspond to the &quot;off&quot; state.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Pat]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=133</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-10-10T08:31:54Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=993005#p993005</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Monophonic couplers saved in combination?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=993002#p993002"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>tmyoung wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Interesting!&nbsp; That&#039;s a totally different behavior than I&#039;ve seen on Windows.&nbsp; Sounds like it could be a bug.&nbsp; I&#039;ve still got 2.0.0 as well.&nbsp; The changelog for 2.0.1 has line about &quot;Fix couplers buttons not clicked in coupler settings window&quot;</p><p>So it&#039;s possible that this is somehow a downstream issue of that.&nbsp; I&#039;ll try 2.0.1 and see if there are any changes to the blank problem I&#039;ve been having.&nbsp; If you could check 2.0.1 on Linux and see if you&#039;re still having this same behavior, I&#039;m sure Modartt would appreciate knowing if it&#039;s still an issue. <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p></blockquote></div><p>I can also confirm the behavior described by @Stephen_Doonan for Windows version 2.0.1.</p><p>In my opinion, Modartt has not yet thought through the programming of the combination logic in all the details.</p><p>On the factory prests, the monophonic couplers in the combinations are set to &quot;none&quot;. This also makes sense, especially if you only play the organ with &quot;One simple keyboard&quot; (also factory default) and want to try out the combinations. This way you can listen to all the manuals and the pedal without having to change the presets.</p><p>Following this logic, the &quot;none&quot; status should be retained for the monophonic couplers when saving the combinations (regardless of whether using the set button or the snapshot function). Unfortunately, this is not the case; instead, the status is generally set to &quot;off&quot; for these 4 couplers.<br />In my opinion this is a logical error!<br />However, if a defined status is to be set, then it would have to correspond to the current setting of the organ, i.e. &quot;off&quot; or &quot;on&quot; (and not generally &quot;off&quot;)</p><p>My suggestion would be that the position of the monophonic couplers should not be overwritten when saving the combinations (via the &quot;Set button&quot;) as long as the corresponding switches on the Combination tab are set to &quot;none&quot;.<br />However, if the setting has already been defined at this point (i.e. is &quot;on&quot; or &quot;off&quot;), then the current status of the coupler should be adopted when saving.</p><p>Alternatively, Modartt could implement an option in the preferences so that the user can decide whether to include the monophonic couplers when saving combinations. If &quot;yes&quot;, then it can only be &quot;off&quot; or &quot;on&quot;, if &quot;no&quot;, then &quot;none&quot; is set - but not &quot;off&quot;!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Pat]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=133</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-10-10T08:12:37Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=993002#p993002</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Monophonic couplers saved in combination?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=992996#p992996"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Interesting!&nbsp; That&#039;s a totally different behavior than I&#039;ve seen on Windows.&nbsp; Sounds like it could be a bug.&nbsp; I&#039;ve still got 2.0.0 as well.&nbsp; The changelog for 2.0.1 has line about &quot;Fix couplers buttons not clicked in coupler settings window&quot;</p><p>So it&#039;s possible that this is somehow a downstream issue of that.&nbsp; I&#039;ll try 2.0.1 and see if there are any changes to the blank problem I&#039;ve been having.&nbsp; If you could check 2.0.1 on Linux and see if you&#039;re still having this same behavior, I&#039;m sure Modartt would appreciate knowing if it&#039;s still an issue. <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[tmyoung]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3155</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-10-09T23:17:26Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=992996#p992996</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Monophonic couplers saved in combination?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=992994#p992994"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>tmyoung wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>It already does that I believe (at least in a way). ...&nbsp; if you&#039;re setting combinations, simply edit the parameter to be either &quot;on&quot; or &quot;off&quot; instead of &quot;none&quot; in the &quot;Combination&quot; tab of the organ settings and it should capture/change them correctly moving forward.</p></blockquote></div><p>In my copy of Organteq 2.0.0 for Linux, making or changing the settings directly in Settings--&gt;Combination <em>does</em> save the state of the monophonic couplers (as well stops, pedal couplers, tremolo).</p><p>But if one saves a combination in Organteq&#039;s main window using the Set button or right-click--Snapshot (or shift-click--&gt;Snapshot), the current state of the monophonic couplers is <em>not</em> saved (as a quick check of Settings--&gt;Combination--&gt;(that particular combination number) confirms, even if none of the monophonic couplers are set to &quot;none&quot; in Settings--&gt;Combination.</p><p>And if one carefully sets or changes a combination in the Settings--&gt;Combination window, and those settings include any of the monophonic coupler switches, the state of those monophonic coupler switches reverts to &quot;off&quot; if one later saves the Combination in Organteq&#039;s main window rather than in the Settings--&gt;Combination window.</p><p>So it seems that Organteq saves the state of stops, tremulant switches, and pedal couplers whether one makes and saves those combination settings in the Settings--&gt;Combination window or in Organteq&#039;s main window, but <em>fails</em> to include the current state of the monophonic couplers when the combination is saved in the main Window instead of in Settings--&gt;Combination, and instead the monophonic couplers state reverts to &quot;off.&quot;</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Stephen_Doonan]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4838</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-10-09T21:00:03Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=992994#p992994</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Monophonic couplers saved in combination?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=992985#p992985"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It already does that I believe (at least in a way).&nbsp; The difference is that there is a third mode in the combination settings called &quot;none&quot; which simply ignores that settable parameter entirely both when applying and learning the combination.&nbsp; It appears that OTQ2 will automatically ignore toggling a &quot;none&quot; parameter when setting a new combination setting (which makes sense--at least to a point).&nbsp; Whether or not ignoring a &quot;none&quot; parameter when using the set button is a bug, a feature that should be added, a preference that should be added, or something best left alone appears to be an open debate--that in the end only Modartt can answer.&nbsp; My vote would be for a fourth parameter which would act as a &quot;soft ignore&quot; or some kind, being none but reverting to on or off when setting a new combination.</p><p>That said, if you&#039;re setting combinations, simply edit the parameter to be either &quot;on&quot; or &quot;off&quot; instead of &quot;none&quot; in the &quot;Combination&quot; tab of the organ settings and it should capture/change them correctly moving forward.&nbsp; The downside is that you have to change that for all ten combinations on each organ.&nbsp; However, you can shift-click to select all monophonic couplers and the selection is remembered when clicking another combination setting in that window.&nbsp; The plus side is that you can use it to have combinations that won&#039;t overwrite parameters--for example, if you want manual control of all tremulants and the Vox Humana regardless of which combination you&#039;re using, you can set them to none and they won&#039;t turn on or off based on your combination changes.</p><p>There is a possible bug in that there is technically a fourth parameter I&#039;ve encountered in some presets which can change around randomly.&nbsp; For example, when opening Baroque Church 1-4 today, the Grand Orgue 16&#039; Quint, 2 2/3&#039; Quint, Mixture IV, Zimbel, and Trommet all had blank settings instead of either on, off, or none.&nbsp; I don&#039;t know how exactly those blanks behave but they seem to usually be acting like an &quot;off&quot; parameter (and I couldn&#039;t tell if it&#039;s a UI issue, a combination issue, or a preset issue--I just know I&#039;m running Windows), but once you click on those stops, it will only cycle through the correct three options.&nbsp; Also, when switching combinations in the combination window, these blanks stayed around but sometimes affected different stops.&nbsp; When changing their values away from blank, the preset didn&#039;t say it needed to be saved, so I&#039;m not entirely sure what&#039;s happening there or why.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[tmyoung]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3155</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-10-09T20:13:35Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=992985#p992985</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Monophonic couplers saved in combination?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=992975#p992975"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s convenient that Organteq saves the state of the coupler pedals and tremulant switches with the combination when it is set or saved, in addition to the state of the stops.</p><p>The Organteq manual states: </p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><p>The stop switches, couplers pedals and tremulant switches manipulation can be fastidious and break the live performance workflow.</p></blockquote></div><p>For that reason, and if there is no good reason <em>not</em> to do so, <strong>it might be nice if the current state of the <em>monophonic couplers</em> were also saved with the combination when it is captured</strong> (using the Set button or right (or shift) click--&gt;Snapshot)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Stephen_Doonan]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4838</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-10-09T17:20:51Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=992975#p992975</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
