<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Which sound do you wish to have in Pianoteq in the future?]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=10003</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Which sound do you wish to have in Pianoteq in the future?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2022 08:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which sound do you wish to have in Pianoteq in the future?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986543#p986543</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>+1 for </p><p>- improved GROTRIAN (more &quot;body&quot; more Presets), add Models<br />- improved YC5 Rock Piano<br />- New Bösendorfer-Pack</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (tom_moremusic)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2022 08:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986543#p986543</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which sound do you wish to have in Pianoteq in the future?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986518#p986518</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>jblongz wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I think Modartt should model their OWN IDEA of what an ideal piano would be.&nbsp; Combine the best characteristics of pianos they already have decoded, then blend those attributes into a unique model.&nbsp; The ability to add our own convolution reverb samples would give the advantage of keeping everything in one plugin.&nbsp; How about that?</p></blockquote></div><p>This is what Modartt did with the K2 but what is an ideal piano? <br />In three centuries, piano makers have tried to make the ideal piano, they have reduced the inharmonicity, improved the action, more reliable and quieter, they have arrived at great pianos, but fortunately the laws of mechanics stopped them in their tracks ... because a piano without all these defects (hammer, string, keys or damper noises, inharmonicity, impossible perfect tuning) is not really a piano anymore. Try with pianoteq to remove everything that can be considered as a defect by the maker....</p><p>Translated with <a href="http://www.DeepL.com/Translator">www.DeepL.com/Translator</a> (free version)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (YvesTh)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2022 19:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986518#p986518</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which sound do you wish to have in Pianoteq in the future?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986516#p986516</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>jblongz wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I think Modartt should model their OWN IDEA of what an ideal piano would be.&nbsp; Combine the best characteristics of pianos they already have decoded, then blend those attributes into a unique model.&nbsp; The ability to add our own convolution reverb samples would give the advantage of keeping everything in one plugin.&nbsp; How about that?</p></blockquote></div><p>Agreed. I believe I&#039;ve suggested this here before. <br />A super K2 of sorts. A second piano for a K pack. Their idea of an ultimate perfect piano - if that notion doesn&#039;t in some way offend the company&#039;s that they have licences with?</p><p>K2 is their own design - it&#039;s not based on a Kawai apparently. <br />A big beast K could be a welcome pack. As K has extended range it could be K2.90! <i class="far fa-smile-wink smiley"></i></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Key Fumbler)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2022 19:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986516#p986516</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which sound do you wish to have in Pianoteq in the future?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986513#p986513</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think Modartt should model their OWN IDEA of what an ideal piano would be.&nbsp; Combine the best characteristics of pianos they already have decoded, then blend those attributes into a unique model.&nbsp; The ability to add our own convolution reverb samples would give the advantage of keeping everything in one plugin.&nbsp; How about that?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (jblongz)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2022 19:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986513#p986513</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which sound do you wish to have in Pianoteq in the future?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986510#p986510</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Modartt keep improving the the YC5 Rock Piano. <br />Yamaha own both companies. We all know what that is. <br />Software synthesiser companies keep copying classic synthesizers, we all know what the copies allude to there too. Who cares about official license..</p><p>An &quot;Empire Boss 290&quot; would be pretty clear to any users that knew enough to want one as well!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Key Fumbler)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2022 17:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986510#p986510</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which sound do you wish to have in Pianoteq in the future?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986505#p986505</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Others should have a &quot;specify&quot; which for me is: Mason &amp; Hamlin</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dv)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2022 14:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986505#p986505</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which sound do you wish to have in Pianoteq in the future?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986503#p986503</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>kennethpiano wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>Chopin87 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Only one vote possible. Where are my multiple options?</p></blockquote></div><p>that&#039;s true... is there a way to make multiple selections in a poll?</p></blockquote></div><p>I would like all of the above. So what use would that actually be?<br />At least only being out choose one gives you a priority. The other thread Zaskar linked to to discusses all the pianos people would like. <br />I haven&#039;t looked at the maths but I believe that the most frequently requested model would be the Bos. 290.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Key Fumbler)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2022 13:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986503#p986503</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which sound do you wish to have in Pianoteq in the future?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986498#p986498</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Chopin87 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Only one vote possible. Where are my multiple options?</p></blockquote></div><p>that&#039;s true... is there a way to make multiple selections in a poll?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (kennethpiano)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2022 12:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986498#p986498</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which sound do you wish to have in Pianoteq in the future?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986496#p986496</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Only one vote possible. Where are my multiple options?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Chopin87)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2022 11:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986496#p986496</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which sound do you wish to have in Pianoteq in the future?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986493#p986493</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>There is already an ongoing discussion with lots of interesting suggestions. <br />Feel free to share your thoughts. </p><p><a href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=6275">https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=6275</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Zaskar)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2022 10:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986493#p986493</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Which sound do you wish to have in Pianoteq in the future?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986485#p986485</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>How about let&#039;s have a poll...</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (kennethpiano)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2022 01:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986485#p986485</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
