Re: Sampled or Modeled? Better or just different?
Jake Johnson, the energy between the partial - is noise while recording. Noises premises - ventilation, lighting, street noise of the recording device. So as I was a little increased the sound level - increased noise. Therefore, a piano between the partial orange.
If I placed the recorder another example closer to the strings and soundboard, it is possible to get more quantity and large volume of the upper part by the record.
I think I understand what you are saying about the relationship between the relationship between the phases (I think), and I do understand and see the differences between the regularity and amplitude of the beats in the model and the real piano. But I also want to hang onto the subject of the "fur" a little longer: I understand that the energy between the partials can be noise from the street, the recording device, etc. But I think I still notice that very close to the partials, there is still more fur (near partial frequencies) on the real piano than on the model. In your video, when you have the frequency window exposed and play the note, isn't the frequency band on the real piano a little wider on many of the partials? In other words, yes, I can see that the broad swath of orange between the partials is noise. But is each partial on the real piano also composed of a wider range of frequencies?
Thanks again for posting these comparisons.
