<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Next Pianoteq 8 sound]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=9871&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2022-11-06T11:43:07Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=9871</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Next Pianoteq 8 sound]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985457#p985457"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Olivier W wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>dv wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>dazric wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>No idea how you did it, but bravo!</p></blockquote></div><p>Linked on the YT description (those pesky embedded videos remove the description <i class="far fa-frown smiley"></i> ) it says it was done with <a href="https://gaudiolab.com/ko/ai_source_separation_technology/">https://gaudiolab.com/ko/ai_source_sepa...echnology/</a></p></blockquote></div><br /><p>Yes,</p><p><a href="https://studio.gaudiolab.io/">https://studio.gaudiolab.io/</a></p><p>it&#039;s free, beta, just need a&nbsp; existing Google account.</p><p>It&#039;s the best on Vocal separation, much better than Spleeter, RIPX, RX.....</p><p>and even better than AudioShake.</p><p>Regards,</p><p>Olivier F.</p></blockquote></div><p>Cool! Thanks for the info. <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dazric]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5077</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-11-06T11:43:07Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985457#p985457</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Next Pianoteq 8 sound]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985455#p985455"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>dv wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>dazric wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>No idea how you did it, but bravo!</p></blockquote></div><p>Linked on the YT description (those pesky embedded videos remove the description <i class="far fa-frown smiley"></i> ) it says it was done with <a href="https://gaudiolab.com/ko/ai_source_separation_technology/">https://gaudiolab.com/ko/ai_source_sepa...echnology/</a></p></blockquote></div><br /><p>Yes,</p><p><a href="https://studio.gaudiolab.io/">https://studio.gaudiolab.io/</a></p><p>it&#039;s free, beta, just need a&nbsp; existing Google account.</p><p>It&#039;s the best on Vocal separation, much better than Spleeter, RIPX, RX.....</p><p>and even better than AudioShake.</p><p>Regards,</p><p>Olivier F.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Olivier W]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8021</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-11-06T10:51:31Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985455#p985455</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Next Pianoteq 8 sound]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985447#p985447"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>dazric wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>No idea how you did it, but bravo!</p></blockquote></div><p>Linked on the YT description (those pesky embedded videos remove the description <i class="far fa-frown smiley"></i> ) it says it was done with <a href="https://gaudiolab.com/ko/ai_source_separation_technology/">https://gaudiolab.com/ko/ai_source_sepa...echnology/</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dv]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8109</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-11-06T02:01:14Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985447#p985447</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Next Pianoteq 8 sound]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985432#p985432"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Olivier W wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>dazric wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Yes indeed, that&#039;s just the sort of sound I&#039;m hoping for in Pianoteq 8. I can&#039;t afford VSL Synchron!<br />Wow, that video was very cleverly done. No idea how you did it, but bravo!</p></blockquote></div><p>Thanks, yes, indeed, real Steinway have an incredible mysterious magic bell in the sound, even in FFF, like this, that i would like in next Pianoteq 8 :</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xQUprFcCpo">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xQUprFcCpo</a></p></blockquote></div><p>That was amazing! Bravo!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[BarbaraRB]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8338</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-11-05T14:00:32Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985432#p985432</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Next Pianoteq 8 sound]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985426#p985426"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>dazric wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Yes indeed, that&#039;s just the sort of sound I&#039;m hoping for in Pianoteq 8. I can&#039;t afford VSL Synchron!<br />Wow, that video was very cleverly done. No idea how you did it, but bravo!</p></blockquote></div><p>Thanks, yes, indeed, real Steinway have an incredible mysterious magic bell in the sound, even in FFF, like this, that i would like in next Pianoteq 8 :</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xQUprFcCpo">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xQUprFcCpo</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Olivier W]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8021</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-11-05T08:57:06Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985426#p985426</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Next Pianoteq 8 sound]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985403#p985403"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Another plus 1 for the scaling in any direction. </p><p>That said actually I&#039;m already happy with the GUI scaling on Pianoteq. Some software out there remains horridly out of date with no scaling and horridly dated tiny GUIs that doesn&#039;t suit older eyes or high DPI displays.&nbsp; Pianoteq already scales nicely, and looks good. The importance of this should not be underestimated.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Key Fumbler]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6154</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-11-04T09:57:54Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985403#p985403</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Next Pianoteq 8 sound]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985401#p985401"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>dv wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>Professor Leandro Duarte wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I&#039;m looking forward to Pianoteq 8.<br />Among the many innovations, I hope it has a fullscreen 16:9 interface.</p></blockquote></div><p>Or even better: a fluid interface which we could resize to any desired size! As any decent program offer! Rather than the fixed ratio and fixed sizes legacy of the long-gone-by past. Admittedly, the competition is much worse from this point of view (I tried Kontakt and could not believe how bad it was), but that does not mean that Pianoteq could not still be improved!</p></blockquote></div><p>If Modartt is working on an iOS port, this would be 95% likely to appear on the desktop version as well.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[lowendtheory]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3379</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-11-04T02:35:58Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985401#p985401</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Next Pianoteq 8 sound]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985400#p985400"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Professor Leandro Duarte wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I&#039;m looking forward to Pianoteq 8.<br />Among the many innovations, I hope it has a fullscreen 16:9 interface.</p></blockquote></div><p>That would make it so much easier to use!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[BarbaraRB]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8338</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-11-04T01:24:18Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985400#p985400</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Next Pianoteq 8 sound]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985399#p985399"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Professor Leandro Duarte wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I&#039;m looking forward to Pianoteq 8.<br />Among the many innovations, I hope it has a fullscreen 16:9 interface.</p></blockquote></div><p>Or even better: a fluid interface which we could resize to any desired size! As any decent program offer! Rather than the fixed ratio and fixed sizes legacy of the long-gone-by past. Admittedly, the competition is much worse from this point of view (I tried Kontakt and could not believe how bad it was), but that does not mean that Pianoteq could not still be improved!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dv]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8109</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-11-03T23:32:53Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985399#p985399</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Next Pianoteq 8 sound]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985398#p985398"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m looking forward to Pianoteq 8.<br />Among the many innovations, I hope it has a fullscreen 16:9 interface.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Professor Leandro Duarte]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6353</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-11-03T22:09:45Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985398#p985398</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Next Pianoteq 8 sound]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985395#p985395"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Yes indeed, that&#039;s just the sort of sound I&#039;m hoping for in Pianoteq 8. I can&#039;t afford VSL Synchron!<br />Wow, that video was very cleverly done. No idea how you did it, but bravo!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dazric]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5077</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-11-03T14:42:29Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985395#p985395</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Next Pianoteq 8 sound]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985393#p985393"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>My favorite Piano VST/AU are Pianoteq 7.5.4 and VSL Synchron Steinway D-274 :</p><p>But i find than the Steinway magical bell is more audible in VSL Synchron :</p><p>example :<br /><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99TJepiuFEU">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99TJepiuFEU</a></p><p>hope Pianoteq 8 will bring in Steinway models more magical bell classical sound <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p><p>Regards,</p><p>Olivier F.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Olivier W]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8021</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-11-03T13:52:32Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985393#p985393</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
