<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Recommendations for better performing laptop?]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=979</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Recommendations for better performing laptop?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:09:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Recommendations for better performing laptop?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=8081#p8081</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>studio64 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Plus a 7200rpm hard drive, they are becoming more popular as standard</p></blockquote></div><p>Yes, I&#039;m a big fan of 7200rpm drives myself. But from what they tell me here that wouldn&#039;t make much, if any, difference AFA how well Pianoteq performs, because the program is processor intensive, not memory/hard drive intensive. I upgraded my memory from 1gb to 2gb and it didn&#039;t make any difference that I could see.</p><p>That&#039;s not to say that a 7200rpm drive wouldn&#039;t be good for other apps- it probably would be. </p><p>Thanks,<br />Michael</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Michael H)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=8081#p8081</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Recommendations for better performing laptop?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=8078#p8078</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Plus a 7200rpm hard drive, they are becoming more popular as standard</p><br /><p>I am getting one soon</p><p>regards</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (studio64)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=8078#p8078</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Recommendations for better performing laptop?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=8073#p8073</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jake, just the information I needed. And unless I find a great deal, I probably will wait until after December 31st.</p><p>Happy Holidays to you!</p><p>Michael</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Michael H)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=8073#p8073</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Recommendations for better performing laptop?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=8066#p8066</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think that most everyone is busy with the holidays. But, yes, a dual core with that speed will boost things considerably. On the other hand, computers often go down in price after the holidays--suddenly everything is an older model. Might be worth waiting for to get still better performance.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Jake Johnson)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=8066#p8066</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Recommendations for better performing laptop?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=7921#p7921</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>Happy Holidays All <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p><p>Presently I&#039;ve got a Dell Latitude D610 Pentium M at 2.13Ghz and I get a performance index of 16. I&#039;m looking at some reconditioned Dell Core2Duo&#039;s at 1.8-2.2Ghz for a possible replacement.</p><p>Can anyone tell me if I&#039;d see a performance boost with a Core2Duo in this range, or should I save up for a more robust machine?</p><p>Thanks,<br />Michael</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Michael H)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=7921#p7921</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
