<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Feature request. More mics]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=9713&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2024-02-27T01:22:22Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=9713</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Feature request. More mics]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=995699#p995699"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Multiplicity of microphones is best suited when there is a corresponding number of outputs/monitors. In this way, microphones are strategically positioned in different coordinates for speakers that emit sound in the same position in a real environment. However, for an audio output with only two channels, the use of ten microphones would result in unavoidable wave cancellations and knots.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Professor Leandro Duarte]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6353</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2024-02-27T01:22:22Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=995699#p995699</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Feature request. More mics]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=995679#p995679"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m sorry to disagree, but I only have 2 ears, so 2 mics are enough. ;-)<br />Joking aside, I&#039;ve never, ever used more than 2 mics for the dozens of piano recordings I&#039;ve made.<br />As always, this is just my opinion, but more than 2 mics = inevitable phase problems.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Luc Henrion]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2024-02-25T20:11:56Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=995679#p995679</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Feature request. More mics]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=995677#p995677"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>DonSmith wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I was watching a video about micing and recording a piano and I&#039;d like Pianoteq to have the option for 10 microphones.</p></blockquote></div><p>I agree, five microphones can be too limiting in some situations. As an example without having to resorting to using layers etc...</p><p>A decca tree (3 mics)<br />Stereo mid side (2 mics)<br />Close stereo (2 mics)<br />Boundary / gallery mics 2 <br />Mono centre close mic&nbsp; (1)</p><p>Also It would be great to be able to have the option of Level &amp; Delay compensation for individual mics.<br />For distant microphones I feel that the limit of +6db needs to be doubled (if no compensation is used). I don&#039;t generally like the sound of using the compensation feature tbh.</p><p>I think what would also be beneficial would be to have an parametric eq on each microphone channel.<br />It would also be great to have some edition microphone modals to choose from.</p><p>As suggested maybe this is just a Pro feature etc.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[musicchamber]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=7057</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2024-02-25T17:32:48Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=995677#p995677</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Feature request. More mics]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=984372#p984372"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Key Fumbler wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>As a workaround for now how about trying copying the exact same preset in layering, but changing the microphone type and positions in the second instance.</p></blockquote></div><p>That would be a clever workaround.</p><p>Lanny</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[LTECpiano]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2046</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-08-30T11:52:16Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=984372#p984372</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Feature request. More mics]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=984297#p984297"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>As a workaround for now how about trying copying the exact same preset in layering, but changing the microphone type and positions in the second instance.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Key Fumbler]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6154</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-08-26T16:57:50Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=984297#p984297</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Feature request. More mics]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=984296#p984296"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Extra complexity potentially unwanted by the average user. <br />Perhaps that should be an exclusively Pro feature?<br />It might give customers an extra incentive to go Pro. <br />There&#039;s quite a lot already in Standard. Probably a feature for hardcore Pro fans.</p><p>I am on Standard FWIW.&nbsp; I&#039;m not against this concept, I&#039;m just considering the right product/customer for it.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Key Fumbler]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6154</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-08-26T14:49:28Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=984296#p984296</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Feature request. More mics]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=984295#p984295"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Unlimited mics would be awesome for me (in number as well as in type) but I am afraid some likely Phase Correlation issues would bring any implementation to the ground. However the software has been slowly improving on that aspect as well so who knows?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Chopin87]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3220</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-08-26T14:08:39Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=984295#p984295</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Feature request. More mics]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=984294#p984294"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I suspect that 5 mics will be plenty for most users, but it&#039;ll be interesting to see what other people say. </p><p>What I&#039;d really like to see is a wider range of mic presets (such as XY Close, ORTF Distant, etc.), set up for optimum effect according to instrument. I&#039;ve found that the default mic presets don&#039;t sound well with all the instruments. Sure, I can move them to an OK-ish position, but I&#039;m not expert enough to make the fine adjustments for a really well balanced sound.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dazric]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5077</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-08-26T13:36:21Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=984294#p984294</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Feature request. More mics]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=984289#p984289"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I was watching a video about micing and recording a piano and I&#039;d like Pianoteq to have the option for 10 microphones. </p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[DonSmith]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=736</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-08-26T06:00:14Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=984289#p984289</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
