<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Feature request: more preset variants, as suggested by Qexl]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=9596</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Feature request: more preset variants, as suggested by Qexl.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 21:54:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Feature request: more preset variants, as suggested by Qexl]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985397#p985397</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>My feature request has to do with linked microphones...</p><p>A right-click on an individual mic reveals its position in space...</p><p>I&#039;d like a right-click on the small circle between linked mics allowing the same adjustments to easily move the coupling as a block with greater precision than mouse movement alone.</p><p>I&#039;d also like the addition of the Ctrl / Command key as a modifier to the mouse for smaller movements and greater precision.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (DEZ)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 21:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=985397#p985397</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Feature request: more preset variants, as suggested by Qexl]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=983522#p983522</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I do really like your slider suggestion dazric! </p><p>That alone might very elegantly replace any ideal of &#039;more preset&#039; i &amp; ii type variants - like your idea a lot. </p><p>I can imagine a clear visual, so users who don&#039;t like EQ or have limited exposure to that stuff could plainly see &quot;Yes, moving slider this way makes it more bassy, less treble heavy.&quot; and so on. </p><p>As far as how to make such a slider - 2 ways might be great..</p><p>I can envisage something based on parametric EQ (even the EQ3 internals might be perfect).. &#039;musical&#039; bandwidths subtly expanded and collapsed depending on where the slider is.. could easily disallow &#039;mud&#039; or other common issues with broad EQ - just a nice musical and super easy EQ to sit on top of the other 2 - and users wouldn&#039;t have to know about Q or other things. But.. that EQ type might include &quot;boost&quot; or &quot;cut&quot; - so you could maybe in Pro get that ability to cut instead of boost.. or even select 3 different Q settings to keep it simple but broader - or some such.. but even just the slider alone = way easier for many. </p><p>Or the other technical way of viewing this kind of control might be as a tilt kind of EQ control - called &quot;Foundation&quot; in some mastering systems - guessing the good ones have proprietary workings - but in essence something just based on what a tilts on the main Equalizer do might be still valuable. Maybe easier to implement - and could be just as effective.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Qexl)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2022 20:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=983522#p983522</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Feature request: more preset variants, as suggested by Qexl]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=983507#p983507</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>dazric wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Another thing I&#039;d like to see (I&#039;ve suggested it before) is a global &#039;Tone Control&#039; slider, something along the lines of the Condition slider, which would alter a cocktail of parameters in a subtle way. If Modartt wanted to make it fairly basic for Stage users (say just a few levels), and more sophisticated for Standard and Pro (a full range of subtle shades), I don&#039;t think many users would have an issue with that.</p></blockquote></div><p>Yes, I think another &quot;global&quot; slider to select the tone, at least on the &quot;darker/brighter&quot; scale would be extremely useful in practice!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dv)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2022 12:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=983507#p983507</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Feature request: more preset variants, as suggested by Qexl]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=983501#p983501</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Another thing I&#039;d like to see (I&#039;ve suggested it before) is a global &#039;Tone Control&#039; slider, something along the lines of the Condition slider, which would alter a cocktail of parameters in a subtle way. If Modartt wanted to make it fairly basic for Stage users (say just a few levels), and more sophisticated for Standard and Pro (a full range of subtle shades), I don&#039;t think many users would have an issue with that.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dazric)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2022 11:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=983501#p983501</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Feature request: more preset variants, as suggested by Qexl]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=983492#p983492</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Good on you dazric <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i> </p><p>I&#039;d be pretty happy if perhaps a few main ones, like a few more of the recording ones had this v.2 kind of name pattering as norm (as long as users might understand, there may not be great re-voicing per each, but sometimes quite mild attenuations perhaps). I know this presents ever more work too though - eek. </p><p>Other presets do go beyond a static categorical title, and into already themselves being considered &#039;variant&#039; I guess. </p><p>We do have Recording 1, 2 &amp; 3 for most pianos - so this is already a fine thing. </p><p>But, yes - I see talk for years about &#039;tone&#039; on forum as if it should be perfect (for every user in every room).. so perhaps some &#039;ii&#039; versions for these might be a good way to see customers that little bit happier..</p><p>&quot;Classical Recording&quot; (a ii less bright, like in a darker hall = prob. the obv. one)</p><p>Thinking on it, actually that&#039;d do it for me (without thinking too long on it).. but will love seeing what others would like to see/hear. </p><p>Cheers!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Qexl)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2022 05:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=983492#p983492</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Feature request: more preset variants, as suggested by Qexl]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=983450#p983450</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Original post here:</p><p><a href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=983410#p983410">https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php...10#p983410</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (DEZ)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 15:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=983450#p983450</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Feature request: more preset variants, as suggested by Qexl]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=983449#p983449</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote from the recent &#039;hidden overtones&#039; thread (Qexl): &#039;...do you find you&#039;d like a kind of &quot;i&quot; &amp; &quot;ii&quot; versions for the main defaults? I&#039;d like to fly that idea - if so feel free to post a new thread - like a feature request. Maybe you&#039;d find support.&#039;</p><p>Yes please, I would very much appreciate some subtle variants (lighter or darker, as appropriate) of the main presets. Also a wider range of recording styles for each piano, if possible (e.g. Close XY, Medium MS, Distant AB, Distant ORTF, etc.). If some of them were only available to Standard &amp; Pro users (like many of the fxp uploads), I don&#039;t think many would complain about that. What do other people think?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dazric)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 14:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=983449#p983449</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
