<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Benchmark results availlable?]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=954</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Benchmark results availlable?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:17:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Benchmark results availlable?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=7610#p7610</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if there are any benchmark figures available in which the performance of Pianoteq with respect to OS is considered. I&#039;m quite aware of the fact that performance depends on much more such as Soundcard and VST Host.</p><p>At this moment I&#039;ve to make a decision on which OS to use:</p><p>- Windows XP? It&#039;s not quite new but there are lots of experience and&nbsp; papers on it on how to tune it<br />- Windows 7? Is quite new but better support towards the future<br />- Ubuntu? Free, but more for the advanced (technical) user. But I also noticed that most of the hardware vendors supply specific drivers for windows (and MacOS).<br />- MacOS? No, I need mac-hardware for it and I like to build the solution myself.</p><p>Main concerns are stability and performance because it is going to be used live. Why this concern? It is something that troubles me: I&#039;ve run Pianoteq with vsthost and cantabile. Both will crash when the samplerate is put to 192kHz. Pianoteq itself, as a standalone application,&nbsp; runs fine at this rate.....but I like to run multiple instances of Pianoteq.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (hvaartsen)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=7610#p7610</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
