<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Benchmark results availlable?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=954&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2009-12-07T12:17:25Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=954</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Benchmark results availlable?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=7610#p7610"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if there are any benchmark figures available in which the performance of Pianoteq with respect to OS is considered. I&#039;m quite aware of the fact that performance depends on much more such as Soundcard and VST Host.</p><p>At this moment I&#039;ve to make a decision on which OS to use:</p><p>- Windows XP? It&#039;s not quite new but there are lots of experience and&nbsp; papers on it on how to tune it<br />- Windows 7? Is quite new but better support towards the future<br />- Ubuntu? Free, but more for the advanced (technical) user. But I also noticed that most of the hardware vendors supply specific drivers for windows (and MacOS).<br />- MacOS? No, I need mac-hardware for it and I like to build the solution myself.</p><p>Main concerns are stability and performance because it is going to be used live. Why this concern? It is something that troubles me: I&#039;ve run Pianoteq with vsthost and cantabile. Both will crash when the samplerate is put to 192kHz. Pianoteq itself, as a standalone application,&nbsp; runs fine at this rate.....but I like to run multiple instances of Pianoteq.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[hvaartsen]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1050</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-12-07T12:17:25Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=7610#p7610</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
