<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Stu Harrison from Merriam Pianos reviews PTQ 6 vs. 7]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=8384&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2021-05-09T02:08:21Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=8384</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Stu Harrison from Merriam Pianos reviews PTQ 6 vs. 7]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=975726#p975726"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>DonSmith wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Also Simeon Amburgey<br />Modartt Pianoteq 7 | PETROF 284 Mistral | Flashback<br /><a href="https://youtu.be/1ZIR_m44IS4">https://youtu.be/1ZIR_m44IS4</a></p></blockquote></div><p>I keep in touch with Simeon in the comments, and we both agree that the Mistral is the best preset that came out from Toulouse so far.</p><p>Of course, I&#039;m excited for more to come!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[studiosnch]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=7330</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2021-05-09T02:08:21Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=975726#p975726</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Stu Harrison from Merriam Pianos reviews PTQ 6 vs. 7]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=975582#p975582"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Fleer wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>studiosnch wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>For some time Stu has been hinting that he&#039;ll review Pianoteq. Finally his review is here!</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_ON_-i3r-k">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_ON_-i3r-k</a></p></blockquote></div><p>Great, thanks. Love that reviewer.</p></blockquote></div><p>Another great one here:<br /><a href="https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jn6C8u5aJ20">https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jn6C8u5aJ20</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Fleer]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4272</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2021-05-01T12:52:42Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=975582#p975582</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Stu Harrison from Merriam Pianos reviews PTQ 6 vs. 7]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=975479#p975479"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>DonSmith wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>It&#039;s interesting how he said the physical modeling is achieved. Does it mean that any recorded sound could be converted into algorithms?</p></blockquote></div><p>as far as i know (and i could be wrong because definitely i&#039;m not privy to the details) the piano model is at bottom an applied math model based on the physics of sound production of a piano.&nbsp; i mean, the underlying model is that of a large collection of vibrating strings coupled to the vibrations of the soundboard and lots of other stuff (like acoustics of the piano cavity).&nbsp; there are various papers online from people who have developed similar such models.&nbsp; so any instrument that produces sound by a similar process might be a candidate for a variation on the model (like various tuned percussion, such as bells, xylophone, steel drums, and things like harps and guitars).&nbsp; but there are plenty of other ways to make sound, and many of them are pretty distant from this kind of model. so i would say that if one wants to go as far as &quot;any recorded sound&quot; then there would have to be some new techniques involved.&nbsp; </p><p>that said, there has been work in training neural nets to generate sounds based on various reference sets.&nbsp; this is a totally different kind of model, though.&nbsp; i assume Modartt uses some techniques from machine learning in developing their own models, simply because such things are quite the rage in applied math these days, but i don&#039;t know if they do or not.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[budo]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5184</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2021-04-25T17:50:23Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=975479#p975479</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Stu Harrison from Merriam Pianos reviews PTQ 6 vs. 7]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=975478#p975478"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Also Simeon Amburgey<br />Modartt Pianoteq 7 | PETROF 284 Mistral | Flashback<br /><a href="https://youtu.be/1ZIR_m44IS4">https://youtu.be/1ZIR_m44IS4</a></p><p>It&#039;s interesting how he said the phyical modeling is achieved. Does it mean that any recorded sound could be converted into algorithms?</p><p>Version 7.3.0 has a different tone (or shape to the sound) than 7.2.3. I like it. </p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[DonSmith]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=736</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2021-04-25T15:37:37Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=975478#p975478</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Stu Harrison from Merriam Pianos reviews PTQ 6 vs. 7]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=975470#p975470"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>studiosnch wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>For some time Stu has been hinting that he&#039;ll review Pianoteq. Finally his review is here!</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_ON_-i3r-k">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_ON_-i3r-k</a></p></blockquote></div><p>Great, thanks. Love that reviewer.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Fleer]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4272</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2021-04-24T15:24:09Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=975470#p975470</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Stu Harrison from Merriam Pianos reviews PTQ 6 vs. 7]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=975469#p975469"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>For some time Stu has been hinting that he&#039;ll review Pianoteq. Finally his review is here!</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_ON_-i3r-k">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_ON_-i3r-k</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[studiosnch]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=7330</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2021-04-24T13:32:11Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=975469#p975469</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
