<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Organteq's 'Audio Load' meter vs. Task Manager's 'Performance tab']]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=8056</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Organteq's 'Audio Load' meter vs. Task Manager's 'Performance tab'.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2022 20:12:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Organteq's 'Audio Load' meter vs. Task Manager's 'Performance tab']]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=982066#p982066</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>wjlljam wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I have cpu overload problem in Organteq only when I use full organ, with all stops activated. It is impossible to play. Such a problem does not occur for example with Sweelinq. I notice that when using Organteq, even configured to use all 8 cores of the i7, only the first core is used and when I use large polyphony with full organ, the first core goes from 100% instead of looking for other cores to work, inside or outside the DAW, which is not the case with other software where there is a perfect distribution between the cores.</p></blockquote></div><br /><p>It is a strange situation you mention. I suspect some setting should be modified to give Organteq access to the full processor power: Please go under &#039;Options&#039;&nbsp; to &#039;Perf&#039; to find information of the processor. And make sure that the checkbox &#039;Multicore rendering&#039; is activated.</p><p>And that your operating system (which?) allows that as well. Under Windows start the task manager via Cntrl-Alt-Del and check under the tab performance the number of physical cores.<br />Second: type msconfig in the search window and run that program as adminstrator. Go to the boot tab and the box &#039;Advanced options&#039; and make sure that the check box next to &#039;Number of processors&#039; is UNchecked. That should allow Windows to use all cores. After OK, restart.</p><p>I use Organteq stand-alone on a PC with W10 Prof and I7-9700K as processor running at 3.6 GHz, audio at 384 samples at 48 kS/s. The 8 cores are working hard when full organ is used with 12 keys pressed, but it manages without overload.</p><p>Sweelinq is a sampled organ with reverb added, and required much less processing power. On that topic it can not be compared with Organteq.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Alex_vD)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2022 20:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=982066#p982066</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Organteq's 'Audio Load' meter vs. Task Manager's 'Performance tab']]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981791#p981791</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have cpu overload problem in Organteq only when I use full organ, with all stops activated. It is impossible to play. Such a problem does not occur for example with Sweelinq. I notice that when using Organteq, even configured to use all 8 cores of the i7, only the first core is used and when I use large polyphony with full organ, the first core goes from 100% instead of looking for other cores to work, inside or outside the DAW, which is not the case with other software where there is a perfect distribution between the cores.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (wjlljam)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2022 16:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981791#p981791</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Organteq's 'Audio Load' meter vs. Task Manager's 'Performance tab']]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=973373#p973373</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Alex.</p><p>nseljan, are you still have issues or did the problem go away?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (tmyoung)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 19:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=973373#p973373</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Organteq's 'Audio Load' meter vs. Task Manager's 'Performance tab']]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=973367#p973367</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>There might be a simpler explanation: the time resolution of the Audio Load is much finer that that of the task manager. Windows seems to average over a second. And Organteq requires much processing power at the (short duration) onset of the pipes.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Alex_vD)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=973367#p973367</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Organteq's 'Audio Load' meter vs. Task Manager's 'Performance tab']]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=972715#p972715</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Most likely it&#039;s some aspect of processing that&#039;s core limited in some way, particularly as 3/8 is roughly 37%.&nbsp; I don&#039;t have the knowledge of the developers on what aspects are multicore and what aren&#039;t.&nbsp; It&#039;s even possible that, depending on the OS, if you&#039;re using a motherboard-based sound device or WDM sound driver, the OS or chipset is blocking how many cores can be used for audio processing.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (tmyoung)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2020 16:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=972715#p972715</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Organteq's 'Audio Load' meter vs. Task Manager's 'Performance tab']]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=972660#p972660</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,</p><p>I was wondering, for those of you who are getting audible cracks due to CPU overload, how do your Organteq&#039;s &#039;Audio Load&#039; and Task Manager&#039;s &#039;Performance tab&#039; correlate? I&#039;m running an Intel i7-2600 and, with enough stops, I&#039;m getting cracks with &#039;Audio Load&#039; meter showing red lines for CPU overload - but, looking at CPU graphs within Task Manager, my CPU doesn&#039;t appear to go over 37 % utilization at any point.</p><p>I&#039;m trying to understand what is happening here - perhaps Task Manager is misreporting, or there is some other reasonable explanation here. :-)</p><p>Thanks for sharing your thoughts.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (nseljan)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2020 23:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=972660#p972660</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
