<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Morphing - my early impression]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=7968&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2020-12-02T19:33:37Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=7968</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Morphing - my early impression]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=971830#p971830"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Qexl wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Love the way the growl introduces some tasteful saturation....</p></blockquote></div><p>Yes... that&#039;s what I was going for.&nbsp; With Pianoteq and most sample libraries - for me - the sound comes across a bit synthetic because it is so clean.&nbsp; The imperfections - or some type of harmonic distortion - created by the particular wood housing, the interaction with the floor, etc, is always lacking.&nbsp; I tend to add some type of saturation vst to &quot;fatten&quot; the sound.&nbsp; I should try some impulse responses sometime or experiment with making my own to taste.&nbsp; The trick is not to blur the excellent sound and character of Pianoteq but to just add that certain something.&nbsp; And everyone&#039;s mileage will vary. <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Cellomangler]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=495</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-12-02T19:33:37Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=971830#p971830</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Morphing - my early impression]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=971767#p971767"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Love the way the growl introduces some tasteful saturation - should be great for those FX you mention. I could hear it in mind for some music I like to record. </p><p>Also tried those same instruments as layers as well as morphed with different mix amounts - thanks for this interesting combo Cellomangler.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Qexl]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4633</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-12-01T13:43:13Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=971767#p971767</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Morphing - my early impression]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=971758#p971758"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The instruments I own are the Steinway D, K2, Hohner &amp; Bluthner.&nbsp; After a few minutes experimenting, I came across a great mix of the Bluthner Cinematic, the Clavinet D6 Growl, and the Erard Close Mic.&nbsp; I&#039;m really happy with my collection of instruments.&nbsp; I have lots of other VSTi and hardware I can mix and match as well but this is going to be great for a cinematic style piano.&nbsp; Throw in Phrasebox driving Chromaphone 3 through a delay/reverb and we are deep into... something.</p><p>FYI:&nbsp; 52:18:48 is one percentage/ratio I was playing with.&nbsp; I also turned down the impedence on the Clav to reduce its sustain.<br />These mixes are going to be highly subjective and vary greatly among sound systems.&nbsp; This could sound appalling to someone else. <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Cellomangler]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=495</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-12-01T02:44:05Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=971758#p971758</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
