<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Can anyone help improve this fxp?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=7512&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2020-06-09T02:58:03Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=7512</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Can anyone help improve this fxp?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=967663#p967663"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>You&#039;re very welcome Chris <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Qexl]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4633</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-06-09T02:58:03Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=967663#p967663</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Can anyone help improve this fxp?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=967658#p967658"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Qexl - many thanks for your comprehensive reply. Really appreciate it. </p><p>I&#039;ve clearly a lot to learn about all the interrelated settings - and I think you&#039;ve definitely improved the original. Thanks again.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[chriswarren]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4793</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-06-08T21:35:17Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=967658#p967658</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Can anyone help improve this fxp?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=967633#p967633"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p><p>interpreting your message (and going after some things I like to hear in those high notes/Chopin), here&#039;s a quick edit for you. I didn&#039;t make any alterations which will fail to work with Stage, so no matter which version of Pianoteq you have, this should work.</p><p>With more time and detail (like which notes exactly etc.) there could be much more possible but I run low on time too.&nbsp; If you have Standard or Pro, then any detailed &#039;note-edit&#039; changes will work for you.</p><br /><br /><p>Audio:</p><p>From e-piano competition MIDI - an enjoyable performance by Edward Zhang (I think 2017) Chopin Berceuse Op. 57 D flat maj.</p><br /><br /><p><a href="https://forum.modartt.com/download.php?id=3909">After Edit</a></p><br /><p><a href="https://forum.modartt.com/download.php?id=3908">Before Edit</a></p><br /><p>.</p><p>FXP file:</p><br /><p><a href="https://forum.modartt.com/file/bozwjwk0">C. Bechstein DG Sweet 1 EDIT</a></p><br /><br /><p>Changes made in the FXP preset file..</p><br /><p>Lowered dynamic from 65 to 52 (you might like 65 though - but this dynamic change goes with the compressor setting - and to my ears, too high and dynamic does make esp. softer notes too far away, adding to a sense of esp. fragile high notes seeming too weak. But like the other changes, repeal what you don&#039;t like - they are just one attack session and they may not all be helpful to the issue you hear there).</p><p>Added compressor (lower the &quot;Mix&quot; slider or switch off if it&#039;s too heavy for your liking - it could probably help or hinder your repertoire on a piece by piece basis - I personally enjoy some artifice esp. with gentle pieces) - what this does is help bring some solidity to high notes by pumping a little of the cabinet noise with it - I feel this works with the following change to unison)</p><p>Widened &#039;Unison width&#039; to 9 - adds some movement in the sonority to high notes. This compounds with the next..</p><p>Adjusted &#039;Unison balance&#039; to +0.60 (adds a little more strength to that now more lively sonority of unison, for want of a better way to express it).. you can right-click &#039;Unison width&#039; to find and alter this setting more to your liking. Try negative numbers for example like -0.60 which could be what you want to hear (a little less full but might &#039;sing&#039; a touch more.)</p><p>Lifted &#039;Impedance&#039; up to 1.02 (might be able to go higher still, since the duplex scale was lowered to 0.40 I feel this brings a touch more warmth and seem to allow higher notes to bring more wooded timbre to surface with them).</p><p>Set Blooming &#039;Energy&#039; to 0.08</p><p>BTW I like that you use &#039;Blooming&#039;, with quite a high number though at 0.13 (which is fine with low duplex I feel) - but it&#039;s possible that lowering it a little could give a sliver extra cut to treble notes (my preference is generally to stick below 6)</p><p>By all means, try changes to these settings made, lowering or raising them each to see the changes.</p><p>These aren&#039;t the only things you could do. I didn&#039;t want to EQ without knowing more the issue you had with the top notes (to me with changes like these, they seem OK so EQ, and esp. note-edit might be overkill if these edits help).</p><p>Hope this gets somewhere to your goal,<br />cheers.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Qexl]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4633</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-06-07T14:32:12Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=967633#p967633</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Can anyone help improve this fxp?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=967612#p967612"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>I&#039;m so nearly there with the Bechstein; Pianoteq is so much more playable than e.g. Garritan CFX (touch / pedal response for instance), particularly for the classics I like to play. However, whilst 80% of the keyboard is great, I just cannot live with the tinkly / thin high treble. It just doesn&#039;t work in the middle of a heavy Chopin piece!</p><p>Can anyone do anything with this to improve the high treble to make it sound more realistic without affecting the tonality of the rest of the keyboard?</p><p><a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/pw3a2c20stih52w/C.%20Bechstein%20DG%20Sweet%201.fxp?dl=0">https://www.dropbox.com/s/pw3a2c20stih5...1.fxp?dl=0</a></p><p>Thanks.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[chriswarren]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4793</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-06-06T17:24:53Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=967612#p967612</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
