<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - New iteration of version 3.05 gives me much better performance]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=742&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2009-08-06T02:21:56Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=742</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New iteration of version 3.05 gives me much better performance]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5689#p5689"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The bug is gone - thank you - may it stay dead.</p><p>Glenn</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Glenn NK]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=750</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-08-06T02:21:56Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5689#p5689</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New iteration of version 3.05 gives me much better performance]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5684#p5684"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><blockquote><p>I notice is that this version has the same &quot;bug&quot; on my computer - the main screen is a hog - whenever I click on the Options screen, the main screen remains &quot;on top&quot; of the Options screen.</p></blockquote></div><p>Yes the problem was that I could not figure how to reproduce that issue. It happens when you go into a sub-menu of the standalone , for example &quot;file/recent midi files&quot;</p><p>We have updated the v305 for windows, the bug should be gone (latest windows version should display : v3.0.5/20090805)</p><p>Regarding the midi file player will we fix that later -- however it is not at all a problem that it keeps going, no leak or whatever.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[julien]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-08-05T11:38:12Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5684#p5684</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New iteration of version 3.05 gives me much better performance]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5637#p5637"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>True, during playing it should stop upon the end of the file (the timer, that is).</p><p>During recording, the user is the only one who should be able to stop it. How about a quick fix of that for 3.06? <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[EvilDragon]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=618</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-08-02T00:26:46Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5637#p5637</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New iteration of version 3.05 gives me much better performance]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5636#p5636"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and while we are at it, here&#039;s another problem:</p><p>After you play a midi file in the standalone, the player (the timer) just keeps going, even when the song is over. I am not sure if this could be a problem (memory leak?), but can&#039;t it stop automatically, or is it some kind of feature that is ill-presented?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Kengrayfield]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=936</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-08-01T23:39:16Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5636#p5636</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New iteration of version 3.05 gives me much better performance]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5615#p5615"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Glenn NK wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>julien wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Yes it took us some time to find out the problem despite a few reports of performance issues. We have been shuffling a lot of code for v305 and the mistake was hidden into a huge pile of harmless and boring changes. Sorry for that. But I&#039;m glad that everything is back to normal.</p></blockquote></div><p>Julien:</p><p>I&#039;m just back from a few days off, and am testing the latest 3.05 right now, but the first thing I notice is that this version has the same &quot;bug&quot; on my computer - the main screen is a hog - whenever I click on the Options screen, the main screen remains &quot;on top&quot; of the Options screen.</p><p>You had made a small change to version 3.04 for me which solved the problem, and now I need the same assistance for 3.05.</p><p>I usually use Pianoteq in conjunction with Goldwave (wave editor) and using Alt/Tab, to go from Pianoteq to Goldwave, always leaves the Pianoteq screen over top of the Goldwave screen.&nbsp; The only way I can hide the PT screen is by minimizing PT.</p><p>Glenn</p></blockquote></div><p>I have the exact problem... Not a huge one, mind you. But sure can be annoying.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Kengrayfield]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=936</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-07-31T22:51:40Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5615#p5615</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New iteration of version 3.05 gives me much better performance]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5612#p5612"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Kengrayfield wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>AFAIK 192khz is very taxing on your system. I once tried running 96khz on a demo song and it hit 60%!</p></blockquote></div><p>Just for reference:&nbsp; with my current standalone configuration, I&#039;m running the Chopin Waltz, Op.70-1, and getting 16-20% usage at 96kHz and 128 samples, with the internal sample rate at 48kHz.&nbsp; (Performance index = 25, polyphony = 256)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dhalfen]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=536</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-07-31T22:16:19Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5612#p5612</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New iteration of version 3.05 gives me much better performance]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5604#p5604"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>julien wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Yes it took us some time to find out the problem despite a few reports of performance issues. We have been shuffling a lot of code for v305 and the mistake was hidden into a huge pile of harmless and boring changes. Sorry for that. But I&#039;m glad that everything is back to normal.</p></blockquote></div><p>Julien:</p><p>I&#039;m just back from a few days off, and am testing the latest 3.05 right now, but the first thing I notice is that this version has the same &quot;bug&quot; on my computer - the main screen is a hog - whenever I click on the Options screen, the main screen remains &quot;on top&quot; of the Options screen.</p><p>You had made a small change to version 3.04 for me which solved the problem, and now I need the same assistance for 3.05.</p><p>I usually use Pianoteq in conjunction with Goldwave (wave editor) and using Alt/Tab, to go from Pianoteq to Goldwave, always leaves the Pianoteq screen over top of the Goldwave screen.&nbsp; The only way I can hide the PT screen is by minimizing PT.</p><p>Glenn</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Glenn NK]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=750</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-07-31T06:45:08Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5604#p5604</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New iteration of version 3.05 gives me much better performance]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5603#p5603"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>AFAIK 192khz is very taxing on your system. I once tried running 96khz on a demo song and it hit 60%!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Kengrayfield]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=936</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-07-31T03:06:10Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5603#p5603</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New iteration of version 3.05 gives me much better performance]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5601#p5601"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It is possible that I can hit only 29% playing the demo Chopin Waltz running at 192KHz??&nbsp; I must be doing something wrong.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[curt]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=835</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-07-30T23:44:05Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5601#p5601</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New iteration of version 3.05 gives me much better performance]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5585#p5585"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Jake Johnson wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I&#039;m looking forward to hearing about how the revision affects the netbook and Linux netbook situation.</p></blockquote></div><p>Today I updated from 3.0.4 to 3.0.5 (released on 28/7/09) Linux 32bit, platform eeepc 901 netbook. I played with Grand C3 Solo (most demanding) a little and feel no difference. I had no issues with 3.0.4, so I don&#039;t know, if 3.0.5 becomes better (or worse, or equal) with 3.0.5. Alas I don&#039;t remember, how high the load percentage was with 3.0.4.</p><p>I use 44,1 kHz, 64 samples, performance index 6 (whatever this index means). I have reverbation in my small Yamaha mixer, so I win performance by switching it off in Pianoteq.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[groovy]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1021</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-07-30T16:45:55Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5585#p5585</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New iteration of version 3.05 gives me much better performance]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5577#p5577"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>My original post mistakenly overstated the cpu load used by the new iteration. I&#039;ve corrected it now--I&#039;m rarely getting more than a 49% hit on the cpu running at 44100, and that&#039;s only when trying to cause problems by banging chords.</p><p>I&#039;m looking forward to hearing about how the revision affects the netbook and Linux netbook situation.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Jake Johnson]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=11</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-07-30T05:18:50Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5577#p5577</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New iteration of version 3.05 gives me much better performance]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5568#p5568"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I had noticed about a 7-10% increase in reported usage on the piano models (especially the C3s), and they ramped up more steeply with higher polyphony -- glad to see things are &quot;back to the future!&quot;</p><p>(I was feeling suspiciously like I was in 2.3 land again.&nbsp; ;^)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dhalfen]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=536</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-07-29T16:26:03Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5568#p5568</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New iteration of version 3.05 gives me much better performance]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5567#p5567"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Yes it took us some time to find out the problem despite a few reports of performance issues. We have been shuffling a lot of code for v305 and the mistake was hidden into a huge pile of harmless and boring changes. Sorry for that. But I&#039;m glad that everything is back to normal.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[julien]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-07-29T14:59:27Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5567#p5567</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[New iteration of version 3.05 gives me much better performance]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5566#p5566"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>&quot;btw we have updated v3.0.5 today in order to fix a small performance regression, so if you are using the &quot;old&quot; v3.0.5 you should also notice a small improvement.&quot;</p><p>Julien,</p><p>I don&#039;t know what changes were made, but this new revision that you released yesterday (7\28\09) gives me a very noticeable improvement in performance. With the previous iteration, my system sometimes locked up when polyphony was high. With this new iteration of 7/28 I&#039;m only very rarely going above 48% demand on the cpu when playing series of big, sustained chords and never locking up. Huge difference. Thanks so much.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Jake Johnson]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=11</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-07-29T13:49:35Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5566#p5566</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
