I didn't knew this instrument existed :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12X-i9YHzmE
Here ( 01:48) he says the lowest note it's bellows human hearing capability, but then he played a sequence of very deep bass notes, one lower than the other, and I could hear all.
I supose that, unless he didn't played the lowest note, I didn't heard the fundamental of that note. Is that supposition right?
Right, you can't hear the fundamental (the lowest note frequency is 16 hertz) but you can see it vibrating.
]]>It's funny how some thermometer manufacturers use a very high frequency, for the alarm to warn it's time to remover the thermometer, that many old people can't listen. Old people get ill easier, like get flu, and would use more often the thermometer than young people. How "smart" this industry is...
Humans can hear much lower frequencies than usually discussed. It's not so much a matter of not being able to hear low Hz sounds as a matter of them not be distinct or musical. You are correct that you are hearing more overtones than fundamentals on most computer speaker systems. My system is only reliable down to 50-60Hz, but I too could hear "something" from each note, but some note were much quieter because their fundamentals weren't being played back correctly. Humans can hear and feel notes of sufficient volume down to at least 10Hz, but as you can start to count the cycles per second, pitch perception becomes nearly impossible.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12X-i9YHzmE
Here ( 01:48) he says the lowest note it's bellows human hearing capability, but then he played a sequence of very deep bass notes, one lower than the other, and I could hear all.
I supose that, unless he didn't played the lowest note, I didn't heard the fundamental of that note. Is that supposition right?