<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Is Pianoteq 4's "Wurly" renamed in Pianoteq 6 ?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=7047&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2019-12-19T16:25:42Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=7047</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Is Pianoteq 4's "Wurly" renamed in Pianoteq 6 ?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=964326#p964326"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>i assume that they can&#039;t call it &quot;Wurlitzer&quot; because of trademark restrictions.&nbsp; for example they are authorized to market some models under their names (like Steinway, Steingraeber).&nbsp; companies are picky about stuff like this.&nbsp; as another example they say &quot;Bechstein Digital Grand&quot; and not just &quot;Bechstein,&quot; to indicate that their model was produced from samples of a Bechstein piano.&nbsp; </p><p>anyway, i am also a Linux user and i have been nothing but happy with Pianoteq.&nbsp; they definitely are building their software with us in mind.&nbsp; i have all the electric piano models (rhodes, wurlizter, and the hohner package), and think they&#039;re outstanding.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[budo]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5184</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-12-19T16:25:42Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=964326#p964326</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Is Pianoteq 4's "Wurly" renamed in Pianoteq 6 ?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=964325#p964325"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Gilles wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>On the Preset Manager comment for the W1 it says: &quot;Virtual copy of the famous W 200 electric piano from the seventies with extended range&quot;. Of course Pianoteq 4 and Pianoteq 6 versions might sound a bit different due to model improvements.</p></blockquote></div><p>Omg, you&#039;re abolutely right ! I didn&#039;t seen this.<br />I think that Pianoteq should gain a lot of users if &quot;you&quot; (I mean Pianoteq) publish this information on instruments pack pages: <a href="http://pianoteq.fr/electric.">http://pianoteq.fr/electric.</a> In this page, there&#039;s no &quot;Wurlitzer&quot; or &quot;W 200&quot; keywords. This is quite bad in term of SEO. I&#039;m searching for a Wurlitzer emulator (or sampler) for Linux since a week or so, and I was on the point to buy another VST pluging, but that is more expensive, and not for compiled for Linux. I started to investigate with Wine emulated solutions like LinVst and so ... Then I came across this video: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-kgl4ljC8E">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-kgl4ljC8E</a><br />I&#039;m not sure if I missed somthing obvious (possible, as I&#039;m super tired those days).</p><p>Anyway, thanks for your answer, and I hope this will help other people. (in all cases this will be good for Pianoteq SEO)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[brunetton]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6805</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-12-19T15:56:48Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=964325#p964325</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Is Pianoteq 4's "Wurly" renamed in Pianoteq 6 ?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=964324#p964324"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>On the Preset Manager comment for the W1 it says: &quot;Virtual copy of the famous W 200 electric piano from the seventies with extended range&quot;. Of course Pianoteq 4 and Pianoteq 6 versions might sound a bit different due to model improvements.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Gilles]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=657</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-12-19T15:38:25Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=964324#p964324</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Is Pianoteq 4's "Wurly" renamed in Pianoteq 6 ?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=964322#p964322"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I&#039;m new to Pianoteq, downloaded the Stage demo version for Linux today, and I was amazed ! The UI est super intuitive, features like auto-connect to Jack are time saving. The possibility to resize UI est great.</p><p>I&#039;m planning to use Pianoteq on stage soon. And I need some Wurlitzer (200A) sound. I&#039;ve seen some videos of people using Pianoteq v4 with the &quot;Wurly&quot; instrument that sounds great. </p><p>I searched in Pianoteq 6 and found that &quot;Vintage Reeds W1&quot; have a sound that is close to the old &quot;Wurly&quot;.</p><p>So here&#039;s my question: is Pianoteq 6 &quot;Vintage Reeds W1&quot; the same as Pianoteq 4 &quot;Wurly&quot; ? </p><p>Thanks very much</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[brunetton]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6805</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-12-19T15:16:04Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=964322#p964322</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
